I'm honestly not sure what I meant by that, just that the killing of Icheb in such a manner was stupid.
I just wish that killing Icheb had been more violent and gross. Toss him through a wood chipper, that way we know he can never come back.
I'm honestly not sure what I meant by that, just that the killing of Icheb in such a manner was stupid.
Violent and gross would fit MT's style.
This is an argument I see being repeated over and again. That somehow because a character has a darker later story or death negates all past stories or past enjoyment. And, as much as I am trying to be respectful this is a point of view but this one makes very little sense to me.So Kirk’s death in Generations makes all his previous stories meaningless?
Spock’s off screen death in Beyond?
Jadzia’s death in DS9?
Who's MT?![]()
We got all that squeezed into an extremely short sequence and it feels jarring because in all other instances Trek crews go through extreme lengths to save one of their own.
I certainly got all kinds of nostalgia feels looking at the Cerritos inside the starbase.I'm looking forward to Lower Decks. Sure it is something completly different, but aestheticly it feels like home.
I will concede that Icheb's death was sort of rushed though. If there had been a Voyager spinoff show, what was a very short scene would have been expanded into a multi-episode hunt for Icheb, Seven and her posse blasting through hordes of Bjayzl's goons to reach him, and even when they find him in that horrific state I just don't see Seven euthanizing him that quickly. I mean they still have sedation in the 24th century right?
Seven would have Icheb sedated, immediately beamed to sickbay where Bob Picardo then runs all sorts of drastic unrealistic procedures to try to save him, go into a psychological crisis realizing he deleted the evil Cardassian holographic doctor who might have known something to save Icheb, and then they finally realize nothing can be done and pull the plug on Icheb.
All that would have taken one episode, maybe 2. We got all that squeezed into an extremely short sequence and it feels jarring because in all other instances Trek crews go through extreme lengths to save one of their own.
Reminded me of Picard in First Contact.There wasn't time -- Seven had Jay's guards chasing her. There was no "sickbay" to beam him to.
Seven did her best under a nightmarish scenario.
Only if it had been the original actor.I just wish that killing Icheb had been more violent and gross. Toss him through a wood chipper, that way we know he can never come back.
I imagine it's because the writers and the target audience grey up with TNG. Even for a lot of casual viewers and in pop culture Picards crew are THE Star Trek nowWhy didn't they choose a TNG-esque setting instead of a TOS setting? They could have good for a TOS setting and take advantage of it's inherent cheesiness and over acting. It'd be a lot more fitting in that era instead of the TNG era.
I'd argue there's differences between all of those deaths and the death of Icheb, mostly in how those deaths were handled and portrayed, none of them very well other than Spock's, and why they were done. One of them real-life death of the actor and one of them the actress leaving the show.
Here? They just wanted to shock you.
And, look, I have no real attachment to Icheb or much from Voyager, just that that scene and killing him reeked of tehm just wanting to do something shocking and gross. And, I, I , think that doing that to Icheb was just senseless and out of line.
Main characters having plot armor happens less in shows like 24 or Agents of Shield, where long running characters often meet sudden and brutal ends.The fact that these characters survive so long should be the exception. Space is scary and a Starfleet career is dangerous, as we are often reminded, and Icheb's death (although not really in the line of duty) helps cement that just because you had substantial on-camera scenes, shouldn't make you any safer than the average redshirt being tossed down a cavern.
Reminded me of Picard in First Contact.
Pretty sure giving Seven of Nine an entirely new motivation was more important than senselessly shocking viewers.I'd argue there's differences between all of those deaths and the death of Icheb, mostly in how those deaths were handled and portrayed, none of them very well other than Spock's, and why they were done. One of them real-life death of the actor and one of them the actress leaving the show.
Here? They just wanted to shock you.
And, look, I have no real attachment to Icheb or much from Voyager, just that that scene and killing him reeked of tehm just wanting to do something shocking and gross. And, I, I , think that doing that to Icheb was just senseless and out of line.
It's also a tired and overused plot gimmick that has been derided and labeled as "women in refrigerators", with the only difference here being the gender inversion. I don't think turning this script tactic into "men in refrigerators" suddenly makes it good writing.Pretty sure giving Seven of Nine an entirely new motivation was more important than senselessly shocking viewers.
They made it visceral for us to emphasise how she must have felt.
"Me was a son to me"
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.