• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Nemesis is better than Insurrection: Convince me otherwise.

Mr. Friscus

Ensign
Red Shirt
I know I'm scraping at the bottom of the barrel in the Star Trek Movie universe, but I've always viewed Nemesis is not as apocalyptically horrible as some do, and I enjoy watching it every few years.

First, let me acknowledge flaws in Nemesis:
- Shinzon's revenge should have been against Romulus, not Starfleet or Earth. They could involved Star fleet in assisting Romulus against Shinzon
- Shinzon's waiting is attempted to be explained, but I can't figure why he does so. Sitting around violating Troy seems like a poor use of his time.
- The dilemma of nature vs. nurture in the film between Picard and Shinzon (same genes, "You would be doing exactly as I would") isn't a very deep concept in my opinion, and they try to portray it as one.
- Data not taking into account that the rifts would prevent communications outward is unexplainable, leaving them as sitting ducks for Shinzon for the end fight.
- The Argo offroad chase scene seemed like filler, to make Picard more "relatable" as a man's man driving heavy machinery and fast.
- How Shinzon dies is rather unbelievable (he clearly sees Picard grabbing the spike and pulling it down, yet charges forward)... perhaps he was that messed up from his condition, but certainly this piercing was done to include a rather powerful notion of Shinzon pulling himself towards picard, further impaling himself.

Now let me give reasons why I like the movie
- First and foremost (and this isn't true of all movie watchers), the soundtrack is incredible and made the movie impossible to be horrible. The blasting brass during the battle scenes with textural sounds was amazing.
- The Scimitar is completely badass, and the end battle scene is one of the top ship battles in Star Trek overall, up there with Star Trek 6 with Enterprise and Excelsior vs. General Chang. The high spot is when Shinzon blows out the viewscreen of the Enterprise bride, then proudly and mockingly sits in front of Picard to claim dominance over him, attempting to toy with him.. only for Picard to order a battering ram charge. The camera work focuses on closeups of Picard and Shinzon's head as if they're butting heads into each other, It's an amazing scene.
- The dual ideas of both Picard and Data facing other versions of themselves, with a movie named "Nemesis", was/is intriguing. I admit they didn't do the right things with it, but the concept is good.
- While Shinzon has his clear unexplainable weaknesses, he is at times competent and powerful, which is required.
- While some likely gaffe at the scene, I think the Data flying scene to get from the Enterprise to the Scimitar is believable enough and endearing. The notion that Picard refused to leave Data as they escaped further drew Data to go to extreme personal measures to save/help Picard.


Given all that, I thought Insurrection was the ultimate pathetic Star Trek Scene. I do enjoy the opening theme from Goldsmith, it's a beautiful piece in general. The Data flying scene with he, Picard, and Worf singing was wonderful, but the antagonists were weak, completely uncompelling, and had odd/unbelievable methods of technology. I think the ultimate worst moment in Star Trek involved when actual robot tag drones got involved in a "Staredown" with Riker, Troy, LaForge, Crusher, etc. Yes, robots will sit still and semi-fear some determined main characters.... ???. I couldn't get over that. While Shinzon wasn't a great villain, I think Ruafo never made me even think he was competent or dangerous, despite being played by a wonderfully legendary actor.

I see lists that commonly have Insurrection above Nemesis, I don't buy it at all. I'm basically applying the Steven Crowder meme with a sign that says "Nemesis is better than Insurrection: prove me wrong"

Any takers?

(I'd also contend that Nemesis is better than Star Trek V... but that's another story)
 
They both sucked. Whether one sucked worse than the other is pretty irrelevant, yes?
If you want to get into Nemesis vs. Star Trek V in another thread, I'm happy to do so LMAO
Although to answer your question truthfully, Nemesis was worse, if only because the plot made no fucking sense.
The Plot had holes, but so did Insurrection. Nemesis was a movie, Insurrection was an episode that happened to be shown in theatres. And the Data-kid dynamic combined with the tag-drone showdown? I know this probably means zilch to you but hey, it's my thread, I have an interest in it. You'll have to do better.
 
I agree that the story in Insurrection felt a little too much like a two-part episode, but Nemesis was amateurishly directed and that dune buggy sequence just took me right out of the movie. As for how I rank them, well, neither one of them are in my top five, how's that?
 
Last edited:
I agree that the story in Insurrection felt a little too much like a two-part episode, but Nemesis was amateurishly directed and that dune buggy sequence just took me right out of the movie. That's for how I rank them, well, neither one of them are in my top five, how's that?
LOL, I can agree that neither are Top 5, but I guess I'll be a guy who says Nemesis is technically underrated, despite it's identified flaws I listed.

If I had to make my list, just to know where I'm coming from, it's

1. Wrath of Khan
2. First Contact
3. The Undiscovered Country
4. The Search for Spock
5. The Voyage Home
6. Generations
7. Nemesis
8. The Motion Picture
9. The Final Frontier
10. Insurrection
 
LOL, I can agree that neither are Top 5, but I guess I'll be a guy who says Nemesis is technically underrated, despite it's identified flaws I listed.

If I had to make my list, just to know where I'm coming from, it's

1. Wrath of Khan
2. First Contact
3. The Undiscovered Country
4. The Search for Spock
5. The Voyage Home
6. Generations
7. Nemesis
8. The Motion Picture
9. The Final Frontier
10. Insurrection
See, now I'm of the camp that The Motion Picture is underrated and would have rated it higher.
 
See, now I'm of the camp that The Motion Picture is underrated and would have rated it higher.
To me it's like The Beatles of music.

It was ground-breaking and fast as the time, but it can't hold up in modern times. I'm no "agist", in that I compare eras directly without context of what was the norm and what technology and knowledge of captivating attention is... but the Motion Picture just drags to me, even when I try to give it grace. the "Vger" aspect is fascinating, but if there's one Star Trek film that needs to be remade, it's that one.
 
Nemesis is garbage; The Motion Picture is a masterpiece. Now we've established where my biases are.

Stuart Baird was an amazingly fantastic editor. He edited so many good films, but the one that holds the most special place in my heart is the original Christopher Reeve Superman. However, he just failed at being a director. Even with the exact same script, Jonathan Frakes would have turned in a much better film, IMHO. The Clockstoppers debacle cost Frakes a career in feature film directing, which I think is a shame. There's a real spark in his work as a director.

Insurrection is goofy in parts, and does feel in some ways like a glorified episode, but it also "feels right" for TNG. I still recognize the characters. And the plot actually makes some sense. Even though I actually tend to agree with Admiral Dougherty over Picard in this particular moral dillema. Also, I love Jerry Goldsmith's Bak'u theme.

So there you have it. I would take Insurrection over Nemesis any day. But, then again, I'd take The Motion Picture over just about any other Trek film any day. YMMV.
 
Insurrection was , perhaps, my least favorite movie. I always kept wondering why “the needs of the many” doesn’t apply to a group of folks who were not native to the planet. Stupid plot, horrible acting.

Nemesis, on the other hand, was the only Star Trek movie I was able to attend the premiere. And for that reason alone, I’d rate it higher.
 
Insurrection was , perhaps, my least favorite movie. I always kept wondering why “the needs of the many” doesn’t apply to a group of folks who were not native to the planet. Stupid plot, horrible acting.

Nemesis, on the other hand, was the only Star Trek movie I was able to attend the premiere. And for that reason alone, I’d rate it higher.
In fairness, that's consistent for Trek. The entire message of the TWOK-TSFS-TVH trilogy is that the needs of the many do not, in fact, outweigh the needs of the few or the one. And Trek has kinda taken that philosophy on numerous occasions. How many billions of people's prosperous and happy lives did Janeway wipe out of existence in order to get her small crew home?
 
I find Insurrection stupid and Nemesis boring. They are both rehashes of multiple better stories, "Journey's End" and The Ensigns of Command" vs TWOK and "Datalore," amongst others. One's cinematography is too bright and the other is too dark. Insurrection's humour is cheap and cheesy, Nemesis' conflict feels forced and unearned and I could do without all the rape. Nemesis deserves a kicking alone for bringing in the Romulans, something Piller wanted for Insurrection instead of the Son'a but Patrick Stewart derided as not enough of a threat, but then brought back anyway in the following film. Also for the primary and secondary plots being both about dopplegangers. And fuck all their space battle shield down to 15% Mutara Nebula ripoff nonsense. Insurrection might feel like The Final Frontier of TNG films but there's nothing like the Nimbus III opening or the desolation in the outpost, in the camaraderie of the campfire scene, or the horror of Doctor McCoy's flashback scene to euthanising his father.
 
I always kept wondering why “the needs of the many” doesn’t apply to a group of folks who were not native to the planet.
Because "the needs of the many" is not supposed to be an excuse for fucking people over.

What does them not being native have to do with it? The Ba'ku have lived there since a hundred years before the Federation even existed.
 
Last edited:
I hate that stupid planet but I also hate the braindead nitwits who thought bottling up the fountain of youth was the best way to deal with that miracle of a planet (although that's probably truth in television). There's a whole planet there! Build hospitals! Study that planet and learn how to duplicate it! These idiots live IN Star Trek.
 
Says who? That's what it's been used for throughout the entirety of human history.
I assumed (with good reason) that you were invoking the Vulcan proverb as opposed to our own sordid past...or present.

In my opinion 'the needs of the many' is about doing what helps the majority, not about intentionally screwing the few. There will always be people who can be made to suffer to elevate others, but I doubt that Spock was advocating for subjugation.
 
Last edited:
NEMESIS lacked a bouncing-ball moment which INSURRECTION did not.....even though it was the one highlight of INSURECTION. Had Ron Perlman been credited at the beginning of NEMESIS, that would have been its highlight. (Imagine my fury when I discovered one of my most favorite character actors was buried under too much makeup and given a throwaway part after it was all over.0
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top