I figured as much because of how soon in the episode she left.I didn't expect it until I saw Captain Freeman send Beckett Mariner to her new assignment.
I figured as much because of how soon in the episode she left.I didn't expect it until I saw Captain Freeman send Beckett Mariner to her new assignment.
I'm one of the seemingly few people who is largely okay with shorter season of Trek over the bloated seasons of yore, but this show is by far the one exception. Maybe it's due to the nature of animation that doesn't allow for last minute script changes or edits, but the writing between both animated series hits it mark dead on more often than one and the only questionable episode of LD boils down more to personal taste than issues of concept. Even still, that episode is no "Threshold" or "Code of Honor"Another solid episode, and just when it finds it's stride, the finish line rapidly approaches... Bummer.
That was over 100 years ago, give it a break.All I want to say re: the Texas-class is that Starfleet apparently has the institutional memory of a gnat. M-5 ring a bell?
Hooray! I missed it though.We finally saw the Vulcan ensign in the background shots =D.
That was over 100 years ago, give it a break.
It's not just M-5. A.I.s gone wrong or becoming megalomaniacal killers is enough of a problem that there is an entire section dedicated to just that, based on where Agimus and Peanut Hamper ended up. So yes, I agree that Starfleet, or at least a part of it, is not learning their lessons well or keeping such things in mind.
Full automation without some kind of manual override in case something goes wrong is just plain stupid.
I really hope they subvert that trope because DATA, 'The Doctor', along with Zora can be proof that AI, when not externally compromised by programming with ill intent; can be very beneficial.It's not just M-5. A.I.s gone wrong or becoming megalomaniacal killers is enough of a problem that there is an entire section dedicated to just that, based on where Agimus and Peanut Hamper ended up. So yes, I agree that Starfleet, or at least a part of it, is not learning their lessons well or keeping such things in mind.
Full automation without some kind of manual override in case something goes wrong is just plain stupid.
Think about what a fleet of "Smaller / Weaker" Drone Ships can do to help protect your borders.I could see the Texas Class ships being subverted and causing a whole lot of trouble needing flotillas to take down ala the Romulan Drone Ship and Connie M5 during the synth? crisis.
I really hope they subvert that trope because DATA, 'The Doctor', along with Zora can be proof that AI, when not externally compromised by programming with ill intent; can be very beneficial.
It's similar to how humans who were compromised to do bad things by external factors forcing them to do such things.
There is always another side to the coin that you should look at.
Not all AI is Evil or will descend to Evil on it's own.
I bolded your quote to prove my point. It has happened often enough that it's a trope. And with the exception of Zora, none of the examples were an actual ship fully equipped with weapons to destroy. It's like giving Skynet full control of all weapons... THE TERMINATOR clearly shows that is a bad move.
And I am talking as a huge fan of Data... he's the reason I became a scifi fan in the first place.
I am not saying all A.I. will turn bad, but not having a manual override on those ships in case it's compromised is irresponsible and plain stupid. Even compromised people can't do as much damage as one A.I. gone bad.
Indeed. ANd Stafleet's history with AI should absolutely have overrides built in without question. Data took over the ENterprise by a prompt from his creator. He also captured Geordi, Picard and Troi by Lore's manipulations. AI has demonstrated repeatedly in Star Trek to need limitations.I bolded your quote to prove my point. It has happened often enough that it's a trope. And with the exception of Zora, none of the examples were an actual ship fully equipped with weapons to destroy. It's like giving Skynet full control of all weapons... THE TERMINATOR clearly shows that is a bad move.
And I am talking as a huge fan of Data... he's the reason I became a scifi fan in the first place.
I am not saying all A.I. will turn bad, but not having a manual override on those ships in case it's compromised is irresponsible and plain stupid. Even compromised people can't do as much damage as one A.I. gone bad.
The bit about the "first ten or fifteen" years after Picard left being horrible was kinda hilarious but horrifying.
And I loved that mural.
So Starbase 80 feels like the Federation equivalent of Grimsby (not sure what the US equivalent is)
Apple TV's Slow Horses feels like another equivalent.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.