• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Braga still "NOT SURE!"

80% of the problems came from UPN more than anything else (which was a problem with VOY as well). Just tell B&B to take a back seat and hire a totally new writing and editorial staff.
 
It was Lucas's creation in the first place. Like any god he could do what he pleased with it.

Enterprise was Braga's creation, more or less.

Braga's usually been pretty honest when he screws up (look up his comments on Threshold). I still think TATV was a decent idea with terrible execution. I think part of the execution problems were trying to do too much in 45 minutes. If they kept the TNG scenes the same length, but added another hour, the Enterprise plot might not have been the watered down crap it ended up being.

Sure, there would still be other complaints about the episode (the idea of using TNG as a framing story, the need to kill Trip off at all, etc), but I think they would have been mitigated (giving Riker a smaller role and killing Trip off in a less contrived way would have been improvements).

That's it. The firing of Moore got braga scared to do anything risky.
Not really. Braga basically pushed Moore out and became free to write crap.

Neither are remotely true. Braga and Moore became writers on two different shows. Because of the turnover at the top of the Voyager writer's department (and quite possibly because the DS9 writing staff was more talented) Braga rose to the top, while Moore only rose near the top. When Moore tried to write for the Voyager staff, he found out he didn't like working with Braga when he wasn't the one in charge of the team (quite possibly for creative reasons, not personal, Braga worked best when someone could independently tell him what worked and what didn't).
 
"They sent me the three [episodes of Enterprise], I went in, had a two hour meeting with Rick and Brannon," Behr told TrekWeb. "It was a very cordial meeting, but everything I said I am sure they did not like hearing. I would not liked to have heard it if someone came into my office and talked as bluntly as I was talking to them. Though again, it was done all cordially. After it was over I am sure they were uncomfortable, I was very uncomfortable, we shook hands, Rick said, 'well, all interesting stuff, we’ll think it over,' and I never heard from him again."
Since this story was made public some years ago, as I said back then, I would pay good money to know what it was Ira Behr told Berman and Braga about their show.
 
It's cool that Braga has apologized for his that crappy last episode, but it would be better if he actually understood why it was a bad episode.
I think Braga does understand why, but being a professional who's still actively involved in Hollywood, he has to remain diplomatic about it and not step on any toes.
Whose toes would this require stepping on other Brannon's own?
 
Brannon Braga @ VegasCon09 said:
I will take full blame for that episode, for those that didn’t like it. In retrospect, it was a very cool idea, that in the end was a mistake. The concept was was to have Manny do a final two-part finale, but then have a final final episode send a valentine to all of Star Trek over the last eighteen years. We just thought it would be a cool concept to show the Next Generation’s crew looking back, though the holodeck, at Archer’s crew. It is a high concept, but I am not sure it came together.

Gotta love this guy!
2qlsk1y.gif


BTW, did he say "a final finale?" :lol:

It's four years after the fact. Who cares about the post mortem at this point?
 
It's four years after the fact. Who cares about the post mortem at this point?

Apparently, a lot of people do. We're still talking about - and it still comes up over at the Triaxian Silk board.

I was at a Stargate con yesterday in Chicago and someone asked Connor Trinneer about it. People were booing at the mention of the episode. AND THESE WERE STARGATE FANS!!!!
 
Not really. Braga basically pushed Moore out and became free to write crap.

Neither are remotely true.
Not even remotely? Because RDM said (I quote):
I have very hurt feelings about Brannon. What happened between he and I is just between he and I. It was a breakdown of trust. I would have quit any show where I was not allowed to participate in the process like that. I wasn’t allowed to participate in the process, and I wasn’t part of the show. I felt like I was freelancing my own show. ... I was very disappointed that my long-time friend and writing partner acted in that manner, that crossed lines to the point where I felt like I had to walk away from STAR TREK, which was something that meant a lot to me for a very long time, from my childhood right through my entire professional career.
So according to Moore, Braga was doing something that made him leave Star Trek, something in fact hurtful.
 
That RDM quote was a while ago, and he was effectively a disgruntled ex-employee at the time. He and Braga made up.

Plus, Moore was more PO'ed over the UPN restraints than anything else. Network interference is the same reason he didn't do the WB Dragonriders of Pern series.
 
He didn't push Moore out to write his own stuff. He was writing his own stuff, Moore came onto the Voyager staff and didn't like the changed writing relationship (from that quote, it looks like a good part of that was Braga was an ass) and then Moore left. The way your phrased it made it sound like some power move where Braga had to push Moore out to rise above him and write on his own.

If you had quoted the rest of my post, you would have seen that I was taking into account what Moore had said. When Moore was a subordinate, not a superior, he didn't like the collaborative process since Braga apparently wasn't willing to treat his ideas with respect and it seems basically delegated to him (of course, Braga was the show runner at this point, so that basically would have been his job).
 
Sounds to me like the problem was that writers on VOY were just writers, where they didn't get any creative input at all, and were basically just told to write whatever the producers handed them. Which explains a lot, actually.
 
I noticed the same in quite a few first season episodes of Enterprise when I re-watched it recently. Story by B&B. Teleplay by *Insert Name Here*
 
Surprisingly, I don't mind Braga (or Berman, for that matter). After all, they created ENT, so without them we wouldn't have gotten that show most of us here like.
As for TATV, well, even after all these years I could go off on a lengthy rant about what's wrong with the episode. I don't understand how experienced writers like Braga and Berman couldn't see how this episode wouldn't work at all. Mainly because those holodeck characters aren't the real ENT characters. There's no way we would know so precisely what they said and did in private during that mission as the episode would like us to believe. And that's the main point, I think. It's not really an ENT episode and it's a pretty bad TNG episode.
The idea of linking ENT with the rest of the Trekverse is interesting but would probably require more than one episode.
 
Just checking. I can't stand the B&B monobrain machine.

It was not an under-estimation to say that if Rick Berman hadn't become involved in Trek, we WOULD NOT HAVE 'modern Star Trek'. He saved TNG and was a guiding force throughout its run; he CO-CREATED DS9, surely the best entry in the franchise (and yes, he had plenty to do with it, sorry, Ira Behr fans). He CO-CREATED Voyager, which had great potential in its first year or two.

I'm not really familiar with Enterprise or the later Voyager years, and I understand that under Berman's stewardship things became stale. I'd be tempted to argue that the milking of the franchise (for which incidentally, Berman was NOT responsible. He argued against both Generations following TNG so quickly, and Voyager coming on air so soon) would have meant the 'stale' factor was inevitable anyway. Very few things last in popularity 'forever' without the odd "break" of several years.

Look, I'm not saying he - or Braga - are perfect, but their demonisation in these forums is laughable. They did a lot of good for the franchise.

Truthfully, I'd say Michael Piller 'saved' TNG; but after that Rick Berman kept it going, and kept the suits and TNG fans generally happy; and ratings for TNG were good. That said, I think it's also safe to say both he and Barnnon Braga stayed too long (and it's evidenced by the fact that ENT (imo) improved greatly once Manny Coto was promoted to 'showrunner'). YMMV.
 
I was very disappointed with TATV, and felt quite shortchanged by it; although I liked the holodeck framing idea, the story it frames was, in American parlance, so lame.

Why was Shran so two-dimensional in it? Here we have a brave, seasoned, respected warrior faking his own death to escape his 'business partners'. After getting Archer to help him with his big comedy jewel, the NX-01 gets attacked by the black-hat heavies, ultimately causing Trip's death. Was it the episode written on the back of a cocktail napkin in the shadow of Don Draper at The Roosevelt? Here was eighteen years of TV history coming to an end, a virtual odyssey that has entertained an entire planet for nearly a generation, and how does it end? Not with a bang, but with a whimper.

Was it too much to ask for heroic? The end of the Romulan War, perhaps?

Shortchanged, absolutely.
 
That, Mirren, was the best summary/critique I have ever read about "the_abomination!!!!!!!"
 
Isn't this something we should all be over by now? TATV was a nice idea, poorly executed. Never mind.

As for Trip dying, I'd wanted that since the start.
 
As for Trip dying, I'd wanted that since the start.
I admire your courage. Takes guts to say that in this board. :D

If everyone was "over it"-- regarding Enterprise, or any of the other shows, or the movies-- then this board would be a ghost town.
If everyone was "over it," then Braga wouldn't have to answer the same frakking questions at every frakking convention or in every frakking interview he does.

Now, if I did a Q&A with Brannon, I'd just ask him if all these TATV questions he's been getting for the past four years have started to make him sick already.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top