B&B R P.U.
There's 0 evidence of this.But the evidence is overwhelming at this point that he is actively hindering the franchise with his "vision"
Or they stop making content under Skydance."Starfleet Enterprise" Who wrote that? Plus "they are the reason the enterprise even gets to operate smoothly?" I guess I get what was trying to be said, both by Kurtzman and whoever wrote that second bit. But man, that's torture to read. But not as tortuous as SEC31 was to watch.![]()
Yeah Alex, Starfleet and the Federation have "black ops", but they aren't what most Trek fans want to see. Lesson learned?
Well, yeah. Agnes and the Borg Queen weren't actually aboard a Starfleet ship, or any ship in that scene. Now you're just twisting facts to make your point.I am saying that if you put one side by side it's obvious which one is taking place on a Starfleet vessel
And there you go again, talking about Matalas getting selected by Marvel as proof that he's A Very Big Deal. Yet, in the thread for the Buffy revival in SF&F you're calling that show a stillborn failure because Chloe Zhao is involved with it, despite the fact she too has done work for Marvel, which in your own words is one of the biggest studios around which only grants the very Best of the Best the privilege of working for them.Terry Matalas - 12 Monkeys, Star Trek Picard, headhunted after his excellent work on Picard S3 by two huge studios to get involved with two huge projects.
Noticing a certain trend in the writers he's criticizing versus the ones he's saying are A Very Big Deal.And there you go again, talking about Matalas getting selected by Marvel as proof that he's A Very Big Deal. Yet, in the thread for the Buffy revival in SF&F you're calling that show a stillborn failure because Chloe Zhao is involved with it, despite the fact she too has done work for Marvel, which in your own words is one of the biggest studios around which only grants the very Best of the Best the privilege of working for them.
And there you go again, talking about Matalas getting selected by Marvel as proof that he's A Very Big Deal. Yet, in the thread for the Buffy revival in SF&F you're calling that show a stillborn failure because Chloe Zhao is involved with it, despite the fact she too has done work for Marvel, which in your own words is one of the biggest studios around which only grants the very Best of the Best the privilege of working for them.
Like you deleted several of your posts responding to me earlier this morning?Please edit your post and I will address the relevant points.
I am aware of Zhao's qualifications, and did not have an issue with her getting hired by Marvel, though I didn't particularly care of The Eternals, but that is beside the point. I'm curious how one can in several threads go on about how great a man specifically because Marvel hired him, and then in another thread trash a woman as being "untalented" despite the fact Marvel also hired her too.
Paramount does not have a production company like "Star Trek Studios" headed by Alex Kurtzman, so Paramount makes the decisions about cancellations, not Alex Kurtzman. If a production company is established at Paramount that will jointly decide on the production or cancellation of Star Trek works, like Disney's "Lucas Film" and "Marvel Studios", and if it is headed by Alex Kurtzman, then it would be said that there is an Alex Kurtzman Parma in cancellations. But there is no such thing at the moment.Very likely he was involved in the cancellation of LD and Prodigy to find room for his latest failures.
This isn't evidence of what you said.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.