• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Why in the Star Trek universe are so many planets named with numbers?

Yeoman Randi

Vice Admiral
Admiral
I've always wondered this: Why, in the Star Trek universe are so many of the planets, in all of the different galaxies named with numbers attached to them?

For a quick example: Janus VI, Gamma Trianguli VI, Tagus III, Exo III, Antos IV and so on. What do the numbers signify?

Was it where that planet was in that solar system? Or was it a colony thta had gone to another planet, but originated on THE planet Tagus (for example)?

Just another one of those little things that i've always wondered about. Anyone know? Thanks~!
 
Re: Why in the Star Trek universe are so many planets named with numbe

I've always wondered this: Why, in the Star Trek universe are so many of the planets, in all of the different galaxies named with numbers attached to them?

For a quick example: Janus VI, Gamma Trianguli VI, Tagus III, Exo III, Antos IV and so on. What do the numbers signify?

Was it where that planet was in that solar system? Or was it a colony thta had gone to another planet, but originated on THE planet Tagus (for example)?

Just another one of those little things that i've always wondered about. Anyone know? Thanks~!

The general rule is that planets with numbers in their names are the first, second, third, or whatever, planet from their star, which is generally just called the name without a number.

So in the Trekverse, it would be accurate to call Earth "Sol III," Mars "Sol IV," Jupiter "Sol V," etc.

What I've never understood is why planets that have native inhabitants are called "[Name] III" or whatever rather than calling that planet by the name given to it by its native inhabitants. Like, Peliar Zel II and Bre'el IV. They're apparently both Federation Member worlds, but instead of calling them Peliar Zel and Bre'el, the native names, they insist on putting the "III" after their names.

The numbering system makes sense for worlds that are colonized and have no native inhabitants, but I for one find it weird -- and if I lived in the Federation, would find it offensive and disrespectful to native cultures -- to use it on worlds with native inhabitants.
 
Re: Why in the Star Trek universe are so many planets named with numbe

It's a numbering system that seems consistent in several other non-Trek sci-fi shows. For instance Babylon 5 is seen in close proximity to "Epsilon III" (the 3rd planet of the Epsilon Eridani system)
 
Re: Why in the Star Trek universe are so many planets named with numbe

I've always wondered this: Why, in the Star Trek universe are so many of the planets, in all of the different galaxies named with numbers attached to them?

For a quick example: Janus VI, Gamma Trianguli VI, Tagus III, Exo III, Antos IV and so on. What do the numbers signify?

Was it where that planet was in that solar system? Or was it a colony thta had gone to another planet, but originated on THE planet Tagus (for example)?

Just another one of those little things that i've always wondered about. Anyone know? Thanks~!

The general rule is that planets with numbers in their names are the first, second, third, or whatever, planet from their star, which is generally just called the name without a number.

So in the Trekverse, it would be accurate to call Earth "Sol III," Mars "Sol IV," Jupiter "Sol V," etc.

What I've never understood is why planets that have native inhabitants are called "[Name] III" or whatever rather than calling that planet by the name given to it by its native inhabitants. Like, Peliar Zel II and Bre'el IV. They're apparently both Federation Member worlds, but instead of calling them Peliar Zel and Bre'el, the native names, they insist on putting the "III" after their names.

The numbering system makes sense for worlds that are colonized and have no native inhabitants, but I for one find it weird -- and if I lived in the Federation, would find it offensive and disrespectful to native cultures -- to use it on worlds with native inhabitants.

First remember that we are supposed to be hearing the translation from their native language.

Aside from that though, I've noticed that in some cases the star is named after the inhabited world within the system.

For instance...we've never been told what the name of the star is in the Bajoran system. In fact it has only ever been referenced as "the Bajoran sun." To me that indicates that the star does not have a name in the local language. That's perfectly reasonable given that our sun does not have a proper name either. So instead the Federation gives the star the same name as the inhabited/dominant world. So in Bajor's case, they've referred to places like Bajor VIII.
 
Re: Why in the Star Trek universe are so many planets named with numbe

where as in the real world, planets are given letters. EG: 55 Cancri b or Formahault a.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exoplanets

For instance...we've never been told what the name of the star is in the Bajoran system. In fact it has only ever been referenced as "the Bajoran sun." To me that indicates that the star does not have a name in the local language. That's perfectly reasonable given that our sun does not have a proper name either. So instead the Federation gives the star the same name as the inhabited/dominant world. So in Bajor's case, they've referred to places like Bajor VIII.

the DS9TM says the Bajor sun is 'B'hava'el' fwiw
 
Re: Why in the Star Trek universe are so many planets named with numbe

So in the Trekverse, it would be accurate to call Earth "Sol III," Mars "Sol IV," Jupiter "Sol V," etc.

What I've never understood is why planets that have native inhabitants are called "[Name] III" or whatever rather than calling that planet by the name given to it by its native inhabitants. Like, Peliar Zel II and Bre'el IV. They're apparently both Federation Member worlds, but instead of calling them Peliar Zel and Bre'el, the native names, they insist on putting the "III" after their names.

Perhaps the other races call their planets Earth in their native language as well.

As for Earth's place 'in the Trekverse' Worf also called sector 001 - the Terran system, in the Best Of Both Worlds.
 
Re: Why in the Star Trek universe are so many planets named with numbe

yeah, but the terran system is IN sector 001, which also includes Alpha Centauri, Proxima Centauri and other systems.
 
Re: Why in the Star Trek universe are so many planets named with numbe

Probably because too many planets are named homeland of the great heroic people in the native lingo.
 
Re: Why in the Star Trek universe are so many planets named with numbe

I've always wondered this: Why, in the Star Trek universe are so many of the planets, in all of the different galaxies named with numbers attached to them?

For a quick example: Janus VI, Gamma Trianguli VI, Tagus III, Exo III, Antos IV and so on. What do the numbers signify?

Was it where that planet was in that solar system? Or was it a colony thta had gone to another planet, but originated on THE planet Tagus (for example)?

Just another one of those little things that i've always wondered about. Anyone know? Thanks~!

The general rule is that planets with numbers in their names are the first, second, third, or whatever, planet from their star, which is generally just called the name without a number.

So in the Trekverse, it would be accurate to call Earth "Sol III," Mars "Sol IV," Jupiter "Sol V," etc.

What I've never understood is why planets that have native inhabitants are called "[Name] III" or whatever rather than calling that planet by the name given to it by its native inhabitants. Like, Peliar Zel II and Bre'el IV. They're apparently both Federation Member worlds, but instead of calling them Peliar Zel and Bre'el, the native names, they insist on putting the "III" after their names.

The numbering system makes sense for worlds that are colonized and have no native inhabitants, but I for one find it weird -- and if I lived in the Federation, would find it offensive and disrespectful to native cultures -- to use it on worlds with native inhabitants.

First remember that we are supposed to be hearing the translation from their native language.

Yeah, but why not just leave the native name untranslated? Sure, real languages tend to create names for other countries -- "Spain" instead of "España," "Inglaterra" instead of "England" -- but that's a function of those languages having long histories of alienation from one-another. Surely the enlightened Federation would think it better to refer to alien planets and cultures by the names they prefer instead of making one up for them?

Aside from that though, I've noticed that in some cases the star is named after the inhabited world within the system.

For instance...we've never been told what the name of the star is in the Bajoran system. In fact it has only ever been referenced as "the Bajoran sun."

Canonically, that's true, but the DS9 Relaunch novels, Star Trek: Star Charts, and The Star Trek: Deep Space Nine Technical Manuel all establish that the Bajoran star is named Bajor-B'hava'el.

And I don't think that the fact that the Bajoran star is referred to by name in the canon is strong evidence it lacks a name. How often do you hear people in casual conversation call our star by its name, "Sol?"

To me that indicates that the star does not have a name in the local language. That's perfectly reasonable given that our sun does not have a proper name either.

The International Astronomical Union may not have given it an official, IAU-approved name, but it has proper names in each Human language; to say that it does not is kind of absurd. In English, the proper name for it is "the Sun," and in many Romance languages, "Sol" is is name.
 
Re: Why in the Star Trek universe are so many planets named with numbe

I've always wondered this: Why, in the Star Trek universe are so many of the planets, in all of the different galaxies named with numbers attached to them?

For a quick example: Janus VI, Gamma Trianguli VI, Tagus III, Exo III, Antos IV and so on. What do the numbers signify?

Was it where that planet was in that solar system? Or was it a colony thta had gone to another planet, but originated on THE planet Tagus (for example)?

Just another one of those little things that i've always wondered about. Anyone know? Thanks~!

The general rule is that planets with numbers in their names are the first, second, third, or whatever, planet from their star, which is generally just called the name without a number.

So in the Trekverse, it would be accurate to call Earth "Sol III," Mars "Sol IV," Jupiter "Sol V," etc.

What I've never understood is why planets that have native inhabitants are called "[Name] III" or whatever rather than calling that planet by the name given to it by its native inhabitants. Like, Peliar Zel II and Bre'el IV. They're apparently both Federation Member worlds, but instead of calling them Peliar Zel and Bre'el, the native names, they insist on putting the "III" after their names.

The numbering system makes sense for worlds that are colonized and have no native inhabitants, but I for one find it weird -- and if I lived in the Federation, would find it offensive and disrespectful to native cultures -- to use it on worlds with native inhabitants.

First remember that we are supposed to be hearing the translation from their native language.

Yeah, but why not just leave the native name untranslated? Sure, real languages tend to create names for other countries -- "Spain" instead of "España," "Inglaterra" instead of "England" -- but that's a function of those languages having long histories of alienation from one-another. Surely the enlightened Federation would think it better to refer to alien planets and cultures by the names they prefer instead of making one up for them?

Aside from that though, I've noticed that in some cases the star is named after the inhabited world within the system.

For instance...we've never been told what the name of the star is in the Bajoran system. In fact it has only ever been referenced as "the Bajoran sun."

Canonically, that's true, but the DS9 Relaunch novels, Star Trek: Star Charts, and The Star Trek: Deep Space Nine Technical Manuel all establish that the Bajoran star is named Bajor-B'hava'el.

And I don't think that the fact that the Bajoran star is referred to by name in the canon is strong evidence it lacks a name. How often do you hear people in casual conversation call our star by its name, "Sol?"

To me that indicates that the star does not have a name in the local language. That's perfectly reasonable given that our sun does not have a proper name either.

The International Astronomical Union may not have given it an official, IAU-approved name, but it has proper names in each Human language; to say that it does not is kind of absurd. In English, the proper name for it is "the Sun," and in many Romance languages, "Sol" is is name.

So in the Trekverse, it would be accurate to call Earth "Sol III," Mars "Sol IV," Jupiter "Sol V," etc.

What I've never understood is why planets that have native inhabitants are called "[Name] III" or whatever rather than calling that planet by the name given to it by its native inhabitants. Like, Peliar Zel II and Bre'el IV. They're apparently both Federation Member worlds, but instead of calling them Peliar Zel and Bre'el, the native names, they insist on putting the "III" after their names.

Perhaps the other races call their planets Earth in their native language as well.

That's entirely possible, but in that event, that still begs the question: Why not just leave the native name untranslated?

If the word bre'el means earth in their language, and that is what they call their planet, then why not just call their world Bre'el instead of calling it Bre'el IV?

As for Earth's place 'in the Trekverse' Worf also called sector 001 - the Terran system, in the Best Of Both Worlds.

"Terran" is just the adjective form of "Terra," the Latin name for Earth, so calling it the "Terran system" is like calling it the "Earth system."

"Sector 001," like all sectors, is obviously an artificial division of space, since it's not like real space has magical invisible lines dividing it into cubes the way the sector system divides the galaxy into cubes of space.

Probably because too many planets are named homeland of the great heroic people in the native lingo.

Yeah, but, again, why not just leave it untranslated if that's the case?

If the aliens call their world yarish'Latert-grash, meaning, "Home of the heroic people," then just call their world yarish'Latert-grash instead of translating it and call the inhabitants whatever they call themselves in their language.
 
Re: Why in the Star Trek universe are so many planets named with numbe

Yeah, but, again, why not just leave it untranslated if that's the case?

If the aliens call their world yarish'Latert-grash, meaning, "Home of the heroic people," then just call their world yarish'Latert-grash instead of translating it and call the inhabitants whatever they call themselves in their language.

We would have probably known about those planets and stars long before we encountered them in first contact. Therefore, the names must be from maps that could be hundreds of years old. We only make exceptions in some cases it seems, like Vulcan, Quo'nos, and Cardassia.
 
Re: Why in the Star Trek universe are so many planets named with numbe

The numbering system makes sense for worlds that are colonized and have no native inhabitants, but I for one find it weird -- and if I lived in the Federation, would find it offensive and disrespectful to native cultures -- to use it on worlds with native inhabitants.

It's not just numbered worlds that aren't called by their native name. For instance, surely Vulcan is just what humans call the planet? After all, why would the Vulcans name their homeworld after a Roman god? Even if we allow that that could be a coincidence, what about Romulus and Remus. There's no way in hell those are the local names.
Aliens probably have their own names for Earth, like Beta 12 (or Beta 9) or something.
 
Re: Why in the Star Trek universe are so many planets named with numbe

The numbering system makes sense for worlds that are colonized and have no native inhabitants, but I for one find it weird -- and if I lived in the Federation, would find it offensive and disrespectful to native cultures -- to use it on worlds with native inhabitants.

It's not just numbered worlds that aren't called by their native name. For instance, surely Vulcan is just what humans call the planet? After all, why would the Vulcans name their homeworld after a Roman god? Even if we allow that that could be a coincidence, what about Romulus and Remus. There's no way in hell those are the local names.
Aliens probably have their own names for Earth, like Beta 12 (or Beta 9) or something.

Among the Herkimanians, the preferred designator for Earth is "Those Jerks Over There."
 
Re: Why in the Star Trek universe are so many planets named with numbe

It's what we do in real life too.

Like Earth, it could be called Sun 3 because it's the third planet from the sun. I like Sun 3 better than Earth, I think I will start calling it that. :)
 
Re: Why in the Star Trek universe are so many planets named with numbe

Gawd, do i love you people and do i love this place!!!
 
Re: Why in the Star Trek universe are so many planets named with numbe

["Terran" is just the adjective form of "Terra," the Latin name for Earth, so calling it the "Terran system" is like calling it the "Earth system."

"Sector 001," like all sectors, is obviously an artificial division of space, since it's not like real space has magical invisible lines dividing it into cubes the way the sector system divides the galaxy into cubes of space.

Oh indeed, and I guess the whole scene is played out so Riker can be the one to say Earth. It would have made no sense for Worf to say Solar system.

Therefore, the names must be from maps that could be hundreds of years old. We only make exceptions in some cases it seems, like Vulcan, Quo'nos, and Cardassia.

Vulcans from Vulcan, Cardassians from Cardassia. But not Quo'nosians from Quo'nos.
 
Re: Why in the Star Trek universe are so many planets named with numbe

Yeah, but, again, why not just leave it untranslated if that's the case?

If the aliens call their world yarish'Latert-grash, meaning, "Home of the heroic people," then just call their world yarish'Latert-grash instead of translating it and call the inhabitants whatever they call themselves in their language.

We would have probably known about those planets and stars long before we encountered them in first contact. Therefore, the names must be from maps that could be hundreds of years old.

Which is fair enough, but that begs the question of why the Federation didn't alter its terms for those worlds after making contact with them.

The numbering system makes sense for worlds that are colonized and have no native inhabitants, but I for one find it weird -- and if I lived in the Federation, would find it offensive and disrespectful to native cultures -- to use it on worlds with native inhabitants.

It's not just numbered worlds that aren't called by their native name. For instance, surely Vulcan is just what humans call the planet? After all, why would the Vulcans name their homeworld after a Roman god? Even if we allow that that could be a coincidence, what about Romulus and Remus. There's no way in hell those are the local names.

I think we have two options:

  1. Accept the conceit that those are the actual native names for those worlds and it's either pure coincidence or the work of meddlesome aliens that they share the names with Human mythological entities; or
  2. Those names were given back when Humans were still full of ethnocentrism and a refusal to use native names, and the names have stuck even though that practice has since changed.

Aliens probably have their own names for Earth, like Beta 12 (or Beta 9) or something.

There's a scene in the novel Andor: Paradigm by Heather Jarman where a Human and an Andorian are discussing their world's names. The Human says, "It's called Andor? I always grew up thinking it was called Andoria." The Andorian shrugs. "I grew up thinking Earth was called Terra."

Vulcans from Vulcan, Cardassians from Cardassia. But not Quo'nosians from Quo'nos.

Technically, it would be Qo'noSians from Qo'noS, not Quo'nos. ;)
 
Re: Why in the Star Trek universe are so many planets named with numbe

They are named according to their systems sun, the first planet out is number 1, the second is 2, etc.

Example: Earth is classified as Sol III.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top