Wrong site, my dude.
Wrong site, my dude.
God I need to watch through more of my list.
There are competing idea as to what the war visually looks like.
![]()
... and it can probably still look that way.
The game Tactical Assault gave potential Romulan ships that could have been involved in the war.I hate the Romulan ships.
I've always liked some of those designs. I do think the war could absolutely look at least something like that, although I hate the Romulan ships.
I do think overall though for non-canon designs from the same source, the 2160-2260 designs work better with the ENT canon. I could see these ships being more Romulan War era.
![]()
The game Tactical Assault gave potential Romulan ships that could have been involved in the war.
![]()
It's relevant because the BoP is the same as the one in "Minefield", but with the bird on its hull.
I could definitely see those ships being ENT-ified.
These ships could also work if ENT-ified.
Hi, this is my first post, so sorry if I go on for too long. I've had a lot of ideas about the war rattling around my head for so long that the thread will be closed by the time I write them all out. For now, here're my thoughts on the cloak and the bird of prey painting
Impractical invisibility
Spock: "Obviously, their weaponry is superior to ours, and they have a practical invisibility screen."
To me, this line implies that impractical invisibility had been observed in the past, so that could be used to justify the use of cloaks in ENT.
The second idea is that no ships had the painted on bird of prey until the war. Assuming the Romulans had been easily destroying the ships of the more well known rival powers (Vulcans, Andorians, Klingons, etc.), seeing the painting would act as a warning to any less powerful species in the interstellar community about what to expect if they cross the Romulan Star Empire.
The third idea is that the painting itself is a weapon of a sort. Based on the telecapture technology from the books, a trojan horse virus could have been planted by Romulan spies during V'las' administration, and spread to other interstellar powers via spies or double agents, or deliberately allowing Vulcan computer technology to be reverse engineered by hostile governments. The Romulans have some kind of technology that prevents internal scans, so a possible upgrade to that could be something that prevents precise targeting locks beyond a certain range. The painting is designed to act as an obvious target, and could contain a hidden repeating computer code within its patterns. When these patterns are scanned by enemy vessels that have have the trojan virus inside their computer systems, the virus is activated, causing catastrophic system malfunctions that would the enemy ship helpless to defend itself or escape. The idea probably isn't feasible; the opposing ship would need a clear scan of the pattern, if the paint is damaged perhaps several scans would be required, there may be delays between scanning the pattern and the virus activating, and it's useless if the pattern is scanned into a computer that doesn't have the virus, but it was worth throwing out there.
There should be more diversity in Trek design. Leave it to modern "creators" and a ship set in the 21st century will look like a ship from the 24th. Saucer, nacelles, Bussards, shuttlebay, etc. No long arc of technological history. The equivalent of an aircraft carrier at Trafalgar.
The wheel in the sky keeps turning.There should be more diversity in Trek design. Leave it to modern "creators" and a ship set in the 21st century will look like a ship from the 24th. Saucer, nacelles, Bussards, shuttlebay, etc. No long arc of technological history. The equivalent of an aircraft carrier at Trafalgar.
I wrote in another thread The Enterprise That Wasn't a bit of how I imagine earlier centuries in the Trek Universe. Not too dissimilar from what Trek presumed for itself before ENT debuted.
An impression of what I think early intra system, sublight, and the first FTL ships looked like: (context)
![]()
More. Left earlier craft, right later craft:
![]()
An impression of what I think early stations looked like:
![]()
These would be late 21st and early 22nd Century technologies.
I hear you but there was no NX-01. It was whatever they wanted it to be. We saw the ring ship Enterprise in TMP, and we had the lamentably non-ring ship Phoenix in FC — never liked that either. Even so, early warp designs looked like this. They could have done very different things with the look of early starships then they did.Maybe, maybe not.
There is a point where technology slows down. Using ships as an example, if you took a naval ship from 2025 and compared it a ship from 1925, they're... at least visually similar.
![]()
USS Mullany, 1925
![]()
2025 Arleigh Burke destroyer
And then...
![]()
USS Boston, 1825.
Going forward 100 years from 1925, the ships look pretty similar. There are differences, sure, but by and large they are similar. Go BACK 100 years from 1925... well... ships look a tad different. The thing is, from 1925 to 2025, those ships are really using a similar technology base. The 2025 ship is improved, but it's still using similar principles from the 1925 ship.
In Star Trek terms, let's say from 2151-on, Starfleet ships are using the same basic principles. They're all equipped with warp drive. The base technology improves, but it's not revolutionized. The Enterprise-E is operating under the same basic principles as NX-01.
It feels silly to still hear complaints about the existence of the NX-01 after almost 25 years of being part of the franchise, but here we are.hear you but there was no NX-01. It was whatever they wanted it to be. We saw the ring ship Enterprise in TMP, and we had the lamentably non-ring ship Phoenix in FC — never liked that either. Even so, early warp designs looked like this. They could have done very different things with the look of early starships then they did.
The Daedalus works fine if you look at it as a cheaply built, mass produced Starship designed to fill out the ranks during the early Federation.Also, the NX leapfrogged over the Daedalus design asking us to believe they came later. No, thank you.
Oh, I've got a lot more complaints about the series (and the ship) than that.It feels silly to still hear complaints about the existence of the NX-01 after almost 25 years of being part of the franchise, but here we are.
What can I say, I have greater faith in Star Trek than it being about certain design elements and copies of copies of copies of stories. And really, the show ended its run early; lots of people had issues with it, its fans notwithstanding.One does have to remember that Star Trek is simply a brand among many other brands. Part of its brand is its particular design aesthetic. A Star Trek ship needs to be recognizable as a Star Trek ship. That means a saucer, that means Nacelles that usually glow red and blue. You want the general public to immediately be able to recognized that something belongs to a particular brand. To go against that aesthetic would throw away decades of work in making Star Trek a recognizable franchise. Even if someone isn't a fan and has virtually no knowledge of the franchise, odds are they'll still be able to recognized one of the various "hero ships " as being part of Star Trek.
So do a lot of other ships that much more easily fit into an esthetic between ENT and TOS. Daedalus makes little sense in that universe. Might as well have NASA design the Sovereign class in the 21st century then call the one in the 24th "retro."The Daedalus works fine if you look at it as a cheaply built, mass produced Starship designed to fill out the ranks during the early Federation.
Enterprise was doomed by being on UPN, whatever issues people had with it had very little to do with its cancelation. Should also be noted that many would argue that Enterprise was finally getting into its stride when it was nixed.lots of people had issues with it, its fans notwithstanding.
In your opinion. I think it fits in rather nicely, especially since they've updated the design slightly and given it surface details pulled from the NX-01.*So do a lot of other ships that much more easily fit into an esthetic between ENT and TOS. Daedalus makes little sense in that universe.
It wasn't just the station. Its executive producer took a look at the cast & crew one day as they were taking pictures and knew inside it was his time to go. He should have gone sooner, but he didn't, nor did his boss, and the show suffered for it. Manny Coto was given free rein to do anything he wanted because they knew it was already over. Arguably its finest season was because they weren't doing what the show had been about.Enterprise was doomed by being on UPN, whatever issues people had with it had very little to do with its cancelation. Should also be noted that many would argue that Enterprise was finally getting into its stride when it was nixed.
I hear you but there was no NX-01. It was whatever they wanted it to be. We saw the ring ship Enterprise in TMP, and we had the lamentably non-ring ship Phoenix in FC — never liked that either. Even so, early warp designs looked like this. They could have done very different things with the look of early starships then they did.
And not just starships. Most of the ships in the collages above are sub-light ships. Even if the warp ships were similar to later ships, earlier ones (and new sub-light ships) could have looked dramatically different. Same with space stations. The drydock in “Broken Bow” looked in many ways more futuristic than the one in TMP and others later.
Also, the NX leapfrogged over the Daedalus design asking us to believe they came later. No, thank you.
I hear you but there was no NX-01. It was whatever they wanted it to be. We saw the ring ship Enterprise in TMP, and we had the lamentably non-ring ship Phoenix in FC — never liked that either. Even so, early warp designs looked like this. They could have done very different things with the look of early starships then they did.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.