Looks like fun.
You crack me up! Oh wait.........are you serious?I don’t believe that for a second. It would have been vastly more popular.
For the people here.I don’t believe that for a second. It would have been vastly more popular.
Why wouldn’t I be? The Enterprise episode where they capture the Defiant was awesome.You crack me up! Oh wait.........are you serious?
So was "Trials and Tribble-ations" but I don't want a whole series about it.Why wouldn’t I be? The Enterprise episode where they capture the Defiant was awesome.
If it’s set in that time period, then yes. They should have added to that, not create something entirely new that isn’t as interesting to look at.So was "Trials and Tribble-ations" but I don't want a whole series about it.
Unless we just want Trek to remain a completely self-isolating niche franchise. In which case, yes, do that.
I think that's kind of the problem with any science fiction show set in the distant future. You can only do so much that the audience will buy into or relate to. Have everything made of light or something and no one will buy into it.Replace the sound effects and you’ve got Star Wars.
The tech looks awfully Discovery era level for a show in the 32nd century
Agree to disagree then. Even Rodenberry distance himself from that look and on purpose with TMP.If it’s set in that time period, then yes. They should have added to that, not create something entirely new that isn’t as interesting to look at.
I’ll be very disappointed if the 32nd century looks like Discovery.
I suppose you're too young to remember when tie-in novels typically came out a month or so before the movie ? When U.S. releases were typically months ahead of us. I remember U.K. newspapers detailing Star Wars plot point by point weeks before it was released here.I'm such an anti-spoiler weenie now....I can't even bring myself to watch this...
Honestly, I loved the novels. I could determine if I wanted to bother at all with a film (Lost World was among the several I did a hard pass on).I suppose you're too young to remember when tie-in novels typically came out a month or so before the movie ? When U.S. releases were typically months ahead of us. I remember U.K. newspapers detailing Star Wars plot point by point weeks before it was released here.
The concept of spoilers hadn't been thought of...
I read a reasonably coherent piece a while ago that postulated that as faster than light travel was most likely impossible, not too distant future "us" will probably be able to upload ourselves into an incredibly detailed and accurate virtual environment where they can break the laws of physics and be able to explore the universe that way....that's kind of the problem with any science fiction show set in the distant future. You can only do so much that the audience will buy into or relate to. Have everything made of light or something and no one will buy into it.
Hologate OS-1I read a reasonably coherent piece a while ago that postulated that as faster than light travel was most likely impossible, not too distant future "us" will probably be able to upload ourselves into an incredibly detailed and accurate virtual environment where they can break the laws of physics and be able to explore the universe that way.
Doesn't sound like a great premise for a show.
Get your head out of the past.I don’t believe that for a second. It would have been vastly more popular.
Not like that. I mean the level of tech used. Didn’t look anymore advanced.
If only Discovery looked TOS.
I suppose you're too young to remember when tie-in novels typically came out a month or so before the movie ? When U.S. releases were typically months ahead of us. I remember U.K. newspapers detailing Star Wars plot point by point weeks before it was released here.
The concept of spoilers hadn't been thought of...
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.