• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

TNG Rewatch: 4x21 "The Drumhead."

Trekker4747

Boldly going...
Premium Member
TheDrumhead.jpg


The Enterprise recently experienced an explosion in the engine room, damaging the warp core, leading to an investigation to find the cause. The investigation leads them to a Klingon exchange officer who was discovered trying to access computer information not available to him and also collecting data information for dispersal using spy-tech hidden in a hypo-syringe (the pretense being he needed regular injections for an illness.)

Starfleet has sent to the Enterprise a special investigator, Admiral Satie, who was responsible for uncovering the attempts to take over The Federation "three years ago" (very likely this is lip service to wrap up the loose ends from Season 1's "Conspiracy.") She brings with her as her entourage a Betazoid co-counselor and an alien woman who serves as a stenographer and process server.

The investigation mounts as Satie is convinced of a greater conspiracy being on the ship even after the Klingon double-agent is outed and it's discovered the explosion in the warp core was the result of a sub-microscopic manufacturing defect and not sabotage.

Her attention largely focuses on a young enlisted man whose records and claims are that his paternal grandfather was Vulcan when in actuality it turns out he was Romulan. As the investigation continues and grows more intense Picard realizes more and more a problem building on the ship that flirts with violating the civil rights of the crew and treads into "guilty until prove innocent." During his own questioning in front of another Admiral in Starfleet; Picard calls Satie's own actions in the process into question, saying that the recent events are essentially a violation of some founding legal principles and codes in the Federation. The Starfleet Admiral leaves, apparently not convinced by Satie's actions, after she goes into a hyper-patriotic rant that essentially accuses Picard of also being something of a traitor.

This is another one of those "courtroom drama" episodes of TNG but unlike previous ones focuses a bit more on actual criminal trials (or at least pretrials) in the Federation and how they're carried out. It's interesting to see how present-day rights for accused persons in many Western countries has carried over into TNG's proposed future, including things like a right to an attorney and the right to remain silent.

The right to remain silent is especially poignant as many times a person opting to exercise this right services to cast the wrong kind of light on that person. The idea being that if a person is truly innocent, why would they keep quiet? Ergo, they must be guilty of something. This is played out in the episode as Worf begins an investigation into the contacts and background of the enlisted man who exercised this right, saying that if he had nothing to hide why did he take right? Picard tells Worf it is not a crime to use it, nor indicative one.

Picard's treatment and interactions with the enlisted man are very good and almost touching. As Picard truly sees that he's an innocent young man who had such aspirations to be in Starfleet and exploring that he forgo-ed being an officer and became an enlisted man instead. The only thing "wrong" with him being that a grandfather happened to be a current enemy.

Many, many aspects of this episode certain fits into the way many trials and interrogations are carried out today, particularly in how we treat "the enemy" by pre-supposing things about them based on how a culture they happened to be connected to behaves. This particularly can be seen in a post-9/11 America and how Muslims tend to be treated, and probably fits to some degree when the episode was made in how the then present and recent past USSR/Russia persons were treated.

The episode doesn't give a whole lot for most of the cast to do as much of the episode focuses on Picard, Admiral Satie, Crewman Tarses and to some degree Worf (who initially is accepted by Satie and her entourage but soon his own history when it comes to family members collaborating with Romulans comes into question.)

A very subtle episode and one we could call a bottle episode if it wasn't for such an extensive guest cast (something bottle episodes don't usually have) but it manages to pull of a message and situation that'll likely ring true in any political or cultural environment and time.

Picard's own loyalties to Starfleet are called into question based on how many times he's broken the Prime Directive and other presumed mistakes he's made during his tenure on the Enterprise which, again, sort of goes with the hyper-loyal idea some political extremes can have in the "You're not less than 100% with us or you're against us" sense.

Really, just a very thoughtful episode that can give one much to think about or see in the current climate. Its message rings as much true now as it did in 1991.

If there's one quibble I have it's that Satie's impassioned speech is a bit over-the-top. The actress does an otherwise fine in the rest of the episode but her delivery of her big speech just comes across as a little over-the-top and kind of corny.

Also, in the line of nitpicking, this goes to a sort of discussion in another thread were it was discussed when the Enterprise's warp engines should be seen glowing. Granted the ship looks better with the engines on, but this is an episode where the engines should have been shown to be off given that the warp core is offline. Other episodes where the warp core is offline or being worked on the engines are shown to be off but in this one the engines are always glowing.

Again, overall, I just find this to be a great episode.
 
Last edited:
Great post. Makes me want to watch it right now. It's episodes like these that make Trek feel so relevant even decades after they aired, giving it a timeless quality.

And it should be noted that this was the last episode Ron Jones scored, as Rick Berman and Peter Lauritson for whatever reason were never happy with his work and decided to let him go after this show. Here's a track from this episode, which captures the whole tone quite well.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xOyIZhvm7K4
 
Love this episode. I agree the right to silence is a great part of the episode. The moral comment from Picard that always sticks in my mind was something about not taking a right granted to a person and turning it against them.

Favorite moment is when she finally makes Worf angry and he looks like he's about to walk over and enact some klingon justice in the courtroom.
 
The Fifth Amendment is something I'm always reminding people of, that using it doesn't imply guilt.
 
Last edited:
Another thing I like about this episode is how it brings a bit more continuity to the show. Mentioning the borg, and some other events from previous episodes, the show rarely refers back to itself like that.

Also this episode is so quotable.

The federation does have enemies! We MUST seek them out

I've brought down bigger men than you Picard!
 
Wonderful episode, with a great guest star who really carried her weight. This is the kind of bottle show Trek should have done more of. Entirely character driven plots and no B-plots as padding. I guess I'm just a sucker for courtroom-style episodes.

The continuity was fun, I really liked how Satie brought up decisions in prior episodes to nail Picard. Remmick did the same thing in Coming of Age. Of course, when she brings up that fake Vulcan ambassador, she's really twisting it, because the fake ambassador fooled all of Starfleet for years. Picard wasn't the one who dropped the ball. That was more Satie's failing than Picard's.

One attempt at continuity failed though, and that was Satie's intro. Saying she helped expose the alien infiltration from Conspiracy made no sense. Picard and Riker exposed the infiltration with two phasers to Remmick's head. If Satie was off somewhere else putting the pieces together, she was of no help on Earth where Picard very quickly diagnosed the problem, confronted it, and solved it. But I guess they needed to reference an event the audience would be familiar with, and that was the first thing they came up with.

I had mentioned the warp engine glow problem in a prior thread. A shame that the original production staff would do that bit of detail in Skin of Evil, but not later in The Drumhead. That would have been a nice fix by CBS-D, but I guess it would have too much work. Perhaps HTV should have remastered this episode. They forgot to light up the engines in Peak Performance. :D

Farewell, Ron Jones. Chattaway did a fine job taking over for him, but the limitations imposed on him and McCarthy are evident throughout the remainder of the show.
 
Jean Simmons was one of Hollywood's Living Legends, at the time. I'm glad TNG got her to do one episode, with them. The one flaw and it may even have been a necessary one, unfortunately, is that Admiral Satie who's "taken down bigger men than" Picard, basically has to hand him the only weapon that can be used against her, on a Silver Platter. Otherwise a very strong episode, all around. A good Worf episode, as well ...
 
I know there was follow-up in books and so on, but — Does anyone know if the intent at the end of this episode was that Tarses' career was truly ruined?

I'm sure Satie could still have torpedoed him if she had enough influence left. But otherwise I don't see why his action deserved more than a reprimand. Okay, falsifying one item of information = bad. But that information was merely who one of his ancestors was. Not even the guy's identity, just his species. If his grandfather turned out to be Commander Tomalak, that's different. (Or if Tarses was an officer.) But as it is, it's like misrepresenting your weight.

Unless it's illegal for anyone to be in Starfleet if they have any Romulan blood? Even the episode didn't imply that was true. But if it is, they should vet all their Vulcan applicants carefully.
 
I intend to rewatch the episode tonight, but if I remember well, Picard was determined to not abandon Tarses and it was essentially the desperate Tarses who believed is career was ruined.

Considering UFP is supposed to be a liberal democracy, a Federation citizen can't be forbidden to join Starfleet because he has Romulan ancestors. Probably every candidate has to mention some brief information about their background for a fast security check-up. So, Tarses committed an offense, but what happened with Satie is the ultimate "attenuating circumstance".
 
Great episode and another fantastic performance from Patrick Stewart. It's amazing how much this episode resonates today, considering the world in which we live.
 
As far as I know there's no canonical information on what happened to Tarses after this episode, his career went both ways in the novels and in other non-canon sources.

I suspect Picard fully went to bat for the kid and did what he could to keep him in Starfleet, he may have suffered a reprimand, a suspension, or something along those lines but it it doesn't strike me as too likely that Starfleet would have tossed him out based on his ancestry. We know Starfleet allows in their ranks aliens from non-Federation planets (Klingons, Ferengi) and doesn't dismiss those officers when tensions arise with those cultures, like when tensions rose with the Klingons during DS9's run they didn't restrict Worf's duties any, hell they didn't even do anything to him when "on paper" his father was classified as a traitor who had given information to the Romulans.

So if being, again "on paper", the son of a man who was in league with the Romulans doesn't get you in trouble, I doubt that being the grandson of a Romulan will get you into much trouble and falsifying his entrance papers hardly seems like an offense to get you ejected especially given the circumstances.

I guess the bigger question is how such a "lie" could hold up. We're told that given the centuries of separation between Vulcans and Romulans that they have identifiable genetic differences, so wouldn't a blood/DNA scan of Tarsis reveal his true genetic lineage?
 
Last edited:
Looks like you, I, and Armored Saint all pretty much agree that his career wasn't too bad off and that it was Tarses' depression doing the talking. Still, if he felt it reflected on him that badly, he might have chosen to quit.
 
It wasn't that he had a Romulan ancestor that jeopardized his career, it was that he lied about it in his application. There's a difference.

This particularly can be seen in a post-9/11 America and how Muslims tend to be treated, and probably fits to some degree when the episode was made in how the then present and recent past USSR/Russia persons were treated.
Not Russians per se, but Communists, yes. At the time, the episode was clearly evoking the Communist witch hunts of the 1950s.

If there's one quibble I have it's that Satie's impassioned speech is a bit over-the-top. The actress does an otherwise fine in the rest of the episode but her delivery of her big speech just comes across as a little over-the-top and kind of corny.
If you mean the one that makes everyone realize she's batshit crazy, that's kind of the point.

One attempt at continuity failed though, and that was Satie's intro. Saying she helped expose the alien infiltration from Conspiracy made no sense. Picard and Riker exposed the infiltration with two phasers to Remmick's head. If Satie was off somewhere else putting the pieces together, she was of no help on Earth where Picard very quickly diagnosed the problem, confronted it, and solved it. But I guess they needed to reference an event the audience would be familiar with, and that was the first thing they came up with.
Remember that Picard was brought into the loop on the conspiracy by a number of other captains who seemed well-informed about strange goings-on in Starfleet...Satie may have been a driving force on that end of things.
 
It wasn't that he had a Romulan ancestor that jeopardized his career, it was that he lied about it in his application. There's a difference.

It was heavily implied in Picard's big speech during his questioning that larger problem with Tarsis was his Romulan ancestry. He even says something to effect of, "Mr. Tarsis's grandfather is Romulan (said in a "spooky scary" voice). Do we condemn a man because his ancestor happens to be a current enemy?"
 
It wasn't that he had a Romulan ancestor that jeopardized his career, it was that he lied about it in his application. There's a difference.

It was heavily implied in Picard's big speech during his questioning that larger problem with Tarsis was his Romulan ancestry. He even says something to effect of, "Mr. Tarsis's grandfather is Romulan (said in a "spooky scary" voice). Do we condemn a man because his ancestor happens to be a current enemy?"

He's directing that at Satie's witch hunt, not Starfleet in general.
 
I'm currently rewatching it and I see another point about continuity. Picard is worried about a potential alliance between Romulans and Klingons...what will partly happen at the end of the season.
 
It wasn't that he had a Romulan ancestor that jeopardized his career, it was that he lied about it in his application. There's a difference.

Right. In my other post, I was questioning why that lie was significant enough to ruin his career. If he was an officer, maybe. Officers would be held to a higher standard. If the Romulan in question was Tomalak or someone influential, then probably. As it is, a relatively unimportant lie should cost him a reprimand, being passed over for an upcoming promotion, losing a stripe. That's it.

I say "relatively unimportant" because ... Seriously. Why is ancestry a criterion for entrance into Starfleet in the first place? Regardless of whether he lied, the fact that they looked into it at all is bizarre. What else are you required to disclose and what kind of judgment do they make about it?

You're right that the episode evoked the Communist witch hunts, but that doesn't imply that Satie was abusing the system. The implication is that it's a highly prejudiced system in the first place.

When I joined the U.S. Army in the 1980s, they wouldn't kick me out for concealing that some of my ancestors were German and others were Lithuanian, despite that they were on the other side of the Iron Curtain.
 
I kind of wonder what Riker was thinking during this whole ordeal. On one hand he's Tarses counsel right? On the other hand Riker is usually similar to Worf, if there's a security risk I imagine he would get pissed off and support Satie in the investigation.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top