Don't get me wrong, it's literally not only one of my favorite episodes of TNG but also one of my favorite episodes of the entire franchise.
But every time I do a re-watch, one specific aspect always bugs me. it's concerning the initial claim that Data may be Starfleet property. And that a hearing was even neded. Maddox makes that argument and hypothetically asks the admiral if Starfleet would allow the Enterprise computer to refuse a refit. At which point the admiral points out the computer is property. Maddox is then quick to make a connection/corelation that Data falls into that category. The admiral then looks to Picard for any quick rebuttal for which he has none . This is when I'm screaming at the TV (in my mind) that it is TOTALLY different . Main reason: The Enterprise computer, a tricorder, transporter pad, medical scanners, etc. do not/ wouldn't be allowed to enlist in Starfleet, attend the Academy, or achieve rank. Im pretty sure that being accepted as a Starfleet cadet automatically gives you certain rights as an attending student alone. Rights, expectations and privileges that a student desk computer wouldn't have .
It's Apples and fried chicken.Not even apples and oranges. How can one be seeking entry into Starfleet if they are already "owned "by Starfleet in the first place? It's an inherent contradictory concept. How can the JAG admiral not see this,? As soon as Data was accepted into Starfleet/Starfleet Academy, the precident was already set that he would have the same treatment and privileges as any fellow attendee or officer. By definition/logic then, Data cannot be properly because computers and equipment do not go through the same process for Starfleet entry as officers and enlisted personnel do.
Now it's possible that if Picard quickly pointed this out in that scene with Maddox, the admiral still would of ordered a hearing. But my main beef is neither Picard nor Guinan or any other person on the Enterprise even brought this up . Seems like common sense to me.
Of course, if the admiral shot Maddox down, we wouldn't have an episode. So I get it. But I wish this counterargument was at least posed.
But every time I do a re-watch, one specific aspect always bugs me. it's concerning the initial claim that Data may be Starfleet property. And that a hearing was even neded. Maddox makes that argument and hypothetically asks the admiral if Starfleet would allow the Enterprise computer to refuse a refit. At which point the admiral points out the computer is property. Maddox is then quick to make a connection/corelation that Data falls into that category. The admiral then looks to Picard for any quick rebuttal for which he has none . This is when I'm screaming at the TV (in my mind) that it is TOTALLY different . Main reason: The Enterprise computer, a tricorder, transporter pad, medical scanners, etc. do not/ wouldn't be allowed to enlist in Starfleet, attend the Academy, or achieve rank. Im pretty sure that being accepted as a Starfleet cadet automatically gives you certain rights as an attending student alone. Rights, expectations and privileges that a student desk computer wouldn't have .
It's Apples and fried chicken.Not even apples and oranges. How can one be seeking entry into Starfleet if they are already "owned "by Starfleet in the first place? It's an inherent contradictory concept. How can the JAG admiral not see this,? As soon as Data was accepted into Starfleet/Starfleet Academy, the precident was already set that he would have the same treatment and privileges as any fellow attendee or officer. By definition/logic then, Data cannot be properly because computers and equipment do not go through the same process for Starfleet entry as officers and enlisted personnel do.
Now it's possible that if Picard quickly pointed this out in that scene with Maddox, the admiral still would of ordered a hearing. But my main beef is neither Picard nor Guinan or any other person on the Enterprise even brought this up . Seems like common sense to me.
Of course, if the admiral shot Maddox down, we wouldn't have an episode. So I get it. But I wish this counterargument was at least posed.
Last edited: