My niece’s 18th birthday is on August 31st, when Sisko and Bashir arrive…
That would actually be pretty cool. I'd love to see DS9 on the big screen - even if it's just a two parter.
Past Tense is (partially) the reason I feel worse about the real world as it is currently.
Back when I first saw it I could (and did!) buy into the basic premise of it. A tragic event that ultimately leads to a better world.
Right now, the deaths of a bunch of people in a camp wouldn't change jack shit. And that's really depressing.
Fortunately, many of the gloomy predictions we have seen in Star Trek have never taken place.When I saw Past Tense in college, it seemed like it was set so far in the future that it wasn’t all that different from something set in the 22rd century. I knew I had a good chance of being alive then, but I would be old.
Now we’re almost there.
I wonder if there will be any public screenings of the two-part episode the weekend before the riots? I’m would love to go to such an event to celebrate that time has passed, we’re still here, and the 30 years since the show aired have turned out okay. It doesn’t have to be an event really, just more than a few people watching it on my TV.
Unfortunately riots across the US in late 2024 are still possible, but I hope people see the risk and will avoid that path.
I wonder if theaters have the ability to contract with CBS, or wherever owns the DS9 episodes, to do a screening. I suppose I would need to contact theaters and figure out who in their office is the person who can arrange a screening. That Friday night or the following Saturday afternoon seems like a good time to revisit this episode.
No, but thanks to people like Henry Starling, those dreadful events are at least postponed.Strange New Worlds established that repeated time travel shenanigans have pushed some key events down the timeline by roughly 30 years at least.
We are not out of the woods yet.
There have been a handful of broadsheet articles over the past year or so noting the "Bad Vibes Economy" or "Vibecession" in the United States - by objective metrics the economy is growing and most people are well off (at least compared to where they would have been five, ten or twenty years ago) yet opinion polling suggests the public feel they're in state of stagnation and poverty.I imagine in the show their riots and live-stream drew attention to the issue and eventually lead to reforms. I imagine they explained that they lost their job, got evicted, friends and family could only take them in for a short time, so they decided to live in their car and go wherever they could find work. But before that could happen, they got arrested and sent to over-crowded prison camps making it impossible to find work.
I could understand how that horrible lack of respect for people's rights could lead to large-scale riots. I do not understand why, now that we're here in the future, there's risk of instability. Unlike in the show, there are plenty of jobs for people who would be gimmies in the show. At least in my area, there is a movement to avoid jailing people with mental illness who would be dims. Crimes is down compared to the 90s, so fewer ghosts. We don't have replicators, but additive manufacturing and automation have come along way, making most everything, except for real estate, formal education, and medicine, much less expensive. With all those facts, it would be hard to explain to my 19-year-old self that people are so dissatisfied that there's political violence, a risk of instability, and a very remote risk of civil war.
19 y/o cgervasi: "Wait, if most social problems are getting better, there's no immediate threat of large-scale war, people can publish their thoughts on FidoNet and the information superhighway without a gov't license unlike in Past Tense, and the world has become more prosperous, you're not going to be fighting about whether to fund a "federal employment act" or something. Did you say you actually have computer you can ask questions to like the Enterprise-D's computer, and most people can afford one? That's so phat. What's there to riot about?"49 y/o cgervasi: "Well, it's about think like whether people say words like latinx, which is a general-neutral form of latino or latina. And you know how people in your time are starting to say disabled instead of handicapped? Well now some people say things like "differently-abled". Also, people have different tastes in things like cars and music. Some people say the differences are so extreme, violence may be the only way to resolve them.
It makes no sense at all to me. We're closer to the prosperity and technology of Star Trek than I ever thought I'd see in my life. It doesn't seem like conditions where I'd expect someone proposing creating prison camps for people seeking work. I'm hoping the prosperity trend continues, and we don't have live through too many, in Sisko's words, mistakes that pave the way for things they take for granted in the Star Trek universe.
This post made me realize that the Simpsons were on tv when Past Tense aired (and really, before DS9 was ever on the air), and the Simpsons are still on the air now!Move over Simpsons!
Maybe humanity after all is better than the pessimistic Star Trek writers thought that it is?
Not to derail the topic, but I doubt the timeline changed because of SNW.Strange New Worlds established that repeated time travel shenanigans have pushed some key events down the timeline by roughly 30 years at least.
We are not out of the woods yet.
The timeline didn't change because of SNW. But SNW implied in the Khan episode, that established events got pushed down the timeline because of accumulated timeline changes from all over Trek. It showed teh outcome, not the cause.Not to derail the topic, but I doubt the timeline changed because of SNW.
How do we know that Gary Seven or another Watcher did not pull a Tallin and made the Romulan agent think she killed Khan?
Besides, that there one only one photo of Khan in existence circa the ‘90s suggests Khan may have simply faked his death, or played along with Gary Seven and vanished for a few years. Which further suggests that the 1990s Eugenics War occurred secretly, and more akin to a cold war of sorts.
That’s explains why the Shenzhen Conventions are a thing in 2024.
Timeline preserved.
Still on track for the Bell Riots.
I disagree with you about holodecks. I expect that we'll have a VERY primitive version of a holodeck within my lifetime (meaning within the next 40 years, give or take). Except it will be a combination of video displays and projections. Nothing solid.Our technology is not THAT close to Star Trek. We are not even close to getting:
warp drive
impulse drive
transporters
replicators
holodecks
ample food for all
CT scans are amazing... but having to crawl inside one isn't exactly like using a tricorder
So what would this country be like if accounting/finance had been mandatory since Sputnik?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.