Those are awesome. That's how I wished Discovery's uniforms would have looked.
I like the designs. Very nice. What would you want to do with more the Kelvin duty uniforms?I took a few swings at it, the last one I went with this fast and dirty and unfinished version. It was more a try at fixing the DSC uniforms. I would go with more than one freaking uniform for one, but this could be the Jacked I guess you would call Class A. With Patches and likely rankings on the shoulders, arm or collar. It would also have a shirt under the jacket.
Those are awesome. That's how I wished Discovery's uniforms would have looked.
Off to a great start so far. The only thing I would add to them is a TOS style black collar, but otherwise it's a great design.Thank ya, they are not finished and rough( The line does not even go ll way down the leg). But, I was trying to blend the two. Really, DSC's base layout is fine, but its too much of one color without any real breaks and the shinny add ones do not help. Strong solid color and as you see, those add on shapes are not bad.
I like the designs. Very nice. What would you want to do with more the Kelvin duty uniforms?
I really liked this idea that someone came up with shortly before ST 09.
![]()
Off to a great start so far. The only thing I would add to them is a TOS style black collar, but otherwise it's a great design.![]()
I know the feeling. I have tons of projects, some even I forget about. I hope you get chance to finish them one day.I did that a while back and only recently even recalled it. I went into my folders to do something and there it was, I find stuff like that fro time to time. Something I started then got busy or distracted and forgot. A black collar might look nice on em really.
The material is stiffer so it feels more uniform to me. However, I'm trying to imagine the evolution of the uniform too, and make it feel more "uniform" as well as in line with the dress uniforms, which use a lot more gray in the coloring of the body and material.Oh that is a pretty nice one as well. Not sure on those awful duty uniforms, most of the issue honestly is fabric, they simply do not read "Uniform" to me. Beyond ones are better, but still don't really work for me. Hell every other uniform in Beyond is better than that one. Humm, if ya tuck em in, add a belt and a better fabric the beyond ones would be far better IMO
The material is stiffer so it feels more uniform to me. However, I'm trying to imagine the evolution of the uniform too, and make it feel more "uniform" as well as in line with the dress uniforms, which use a lot more gray in the coloring of the body and material.
The Shenzhou does look like she was designed in the first few decades after the birth of the Federation. So much of her screams "NX-class tribute" that I wouldn't be surprised if the Walker-class starships were first launched before the end of the 22nd century and much like the Excelsior-class became a workhorse for Starfleet for decades.
Technically, that's a uniform...They simply read as "Sports jersey" to me
I took a few swings at it, the last one I went with this fast and dirty and unfinished version. It was more a try at fixing the DSC uniforms. I would go with more than one freaking uniform for one, but this could be the Jacked I guess you would call Class A. With Patches and likely rankings on the shoulders, arm or collar. It would also have a shirt under the jacket.
For Duty Uniforms, I would go something like this, although I may add a belt. And If I ever finish this, jumpsuit. Pretty close to the ENT one in cut as it was damned practical.
![]()
I agree with you in general, though I wouldn't call this "internal consistency" since the only reason this happened is because they were drastically limited in what they could build by practical considerations. Compare, for example, the Type-7 and Type-6 shuttlecraft on the Enterprise and the fact that these two were supposed to have been carried by the same ship... they look NOTHING ALIKE and don't have anything in common except for the overall shape of their side windows. And yet we all know that the only reason the Type-6 even exists is because the set buildings completely fucked the execution of Probert's design concept and instead built a big clunky thing that looked like a minibus.Previous Treks have usually had more internal consistency, though part of that is a side effect of practical models vs cgi models.
I couldn't have said it better. I get what he's trying to do, I just don't think it's a very original design. As I've said, alot of Eaves' work is extremely derivative, and that style doesn't always resonate when you're trying to design something totally new.As to Eaves, I am ambivalent. I used to like the E, but every since I realised it felt like someone had stuck the refit constitution and the Galaxy class in a morphing program then stopped it partway, I couldn’t shake the feeling that (a) this probably happened and (b) from a certain perspective, this makes no sense. The gothic sweep arches and irregular cutouts (a trend which increases as he goes) also don’t feel light a natural growth either, though I appreciate the thought and work he clearly puts in. His design seem more retro TMP era that the progression we saw in the Sternbach designed ships. (There’s a lot of the refit and the reliant in the E) This is a side effect of him looking back at the TOS movies as what a motion picture starship should look like versus the TV designs, partially due to direction from producers etc I think.
At least for the Klingon designs, I agree. Some of STO's Starfleet ships look positively godawful... although the Guardian Cruiser and the Odyssey Class are two of my favorite starship designs EVER.They would have been better off cutting a deal with Cryptic to borrow Marrone for the ship designs, he has a feel for how and why each eras designs work, and why those design languages form a big part of Treks overall set-up.
No but despite being ugly, the Vengeance is a pretty awesome ship. I wish we'd see it again.
Enterprise?? Voyager?? They both built plenty of new ships/designs and those ships had a consistency.. Discovery is probably the first Star Trek production in history to not actually have that problem, with all-original starship designs that are not themselves kitbashes or re-arrangements
Yeah, that makes no sense to me.I just deal with the other DSC uniforms. Rank indicators on the Chevron is just unwieldy and functionally poor.
Not really.![]()
The shorter neck, the darker lighting, this angle that they had the ship canted at coming in....my very first impression was that they were aiming for *somewhat* of a Vengeance-feel to the new version.
Anyone else get that impression at all?
Voyager always stood out to me against TNG era ship as being an odd duck. I loved it for that difference, but it never felt like a TNG Starfleet ship, same with the Defiant.Enterprise?? Voyager?? They both built plenty of new ships/designs and those ships had a consistency.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.