Mine too.Really? I never even realized. I'll have to revisit the film. It was the first Trek I saw in theaters.
And Insurrection was my last.

Mine too.Really? I never even realized. I'll have to revisit the film. It was the first Trek I saw in theaters.
Worf specifically stated that the reason the other Klingons did not look like he was, "...something we Klingons DO NOT like to discuss." So, it was not ignored.
Right, but in my view this line wasn't really necessary to explain the differences - the RL reasons for them were already pretty well known
Mine too.Really? I never even realized. I'll have to revisit the film. It was the first Trek I saw in theaters.
And Insurrection was my last.![]()
What a good first movie to see in the theater!
(Mine was 'The Little Mermaid.')
It wasn't the first movie I saw in the theater. lol. It was the first Trek that I saw in theaters, and I saw each of the films after that as well.
My first movie was 'Bambi', and I saw it when I was a Freshman in High School, with my 2 sisters. I'm from a very strict Southern Baptist family and they felt very strongly that seeing movies in theaters was a sign of the end times. Our mother disowned us briefly for seeing Bambi. I followed that up by going to see 'The Rocky Horror Picture Show'. My mother got over it in time. I saw 'The Little Mermaid' during it's rerelease. lol
Perhaps. But when 'Trials' first aired, and I was watching it with a group of friends, that line got the best response from the entire episode. In an episode that was filled with Trek continuity & amazing crossovers, geeky jokes and cool references - the line about the difference in Klingons got the biggest reaction from us, and was what we discussed most after the episode. The line wasn't meant to 'explain' the difference, but simply to acknowledge that there was one, in an episode that wasn't really about that. I thought it walked that line in a very funny yet classy manner. My friends agreed that it was brilliant. And all this talk of it is making me long to revisit it.![]()
Actually no, I didn't know that. To be honest, the Engineering section of the Trek BBS (with the Trek Tech forum) is the only section I have minimized on my Trek BBS main page.Well, as you know the Excelsior is a slight obsession of mine.
Yeah, that's something I noticed, too. I like the metal plating more, myself. It just looked a little more military.IIRC, the bridge set was given carpeting where there was previously metal plating in TUC
(Incidentally, you have all the shows on DVD except VGR? Geez, you must be rich. I only have TOS and TAS. I'd almost give a finger for TNG.)
Actually no, I didn't know that. To be honest, the Engineering section of the Trek BBS (with the Trek Tech forum) is the only section I have minimized on my Trek BBS main page.Well, as you know the Excelsior is a slight obsession of mine.
But that looks like some very interesting work you put up there.![]()
Yeah, that's something I noticed, too. I like the metal plating more, myself. It just looked a little more military.IIRC, the bridge set was given carpeting where there was previously metal plating in TUC
(Incidentally, you have all the shows on DVD except VGR? Geez, you must be rich. I only have TOS and TAS. I'd almost give a finger for TNG.)
No, I can assure you that I'm most certainly not rich. I'm just a giant Trek fan. I bought the DS9 and TOS sets when they came out (with the money I earned during my Zivildienst). The Enterprise sets were mostly birthday and christmas presents from my parents. As for TNG, I never bought the single season boxes. I waited for the 20th anniversary release of the whole series, which only cost me circa 120 Euro when I bought them from Amazon. Now if only they'd also release VOY in its entirety for this fair price.
![]()
The closest one that springs to mine was the suggestion in the FASA RPG (and perhaps some other sources - I'm not sure) that the Klingons comprised several different subspecies, some of whom have ridges and some do not.
The closest one that springs to mine was the suggestion in the FASA RPG (and perhaps some other sources - I'm not sure) that the Klingons comprised several different subspecies, some of whom have ridges and some do not.
They weren't "subraces" per se, they were Klingon/Human and Klingon/Romulan hybrids (technically known as "Fusions"). The Klingons supposedly created them because the "pure" (or "Imperial") Klingons had a hard time combating either opponent because of differences in temperment, mental acuity, etc.
The closest one that springs to mine was the suggestion in the FASA RPG (and perhaps some other sources - I'm not sure) that the Klingons comprised several different subspecies, some of whom have ridges and some do not.
They weren't "subraces" per se, they were Klingon/Human and Klingon/Romulan hybrids (technically known as "Fusions"). The Klingons supposedly created them because the "pure" (or "Imperial") Klingons had a hard time combating either opponent because of differences in temperment, mental acuity, etc.
It was a rather neat little idea to be honest![]()
They weren't "subraces" per se, they were Klingon/Human and Klingon/Romulan hybrids (technically known as "Fusions"). The Klingons supposedly created them because the "pure" (or "Imperial") Klingons had a hard time combating either opponent because of differences in temperment, mental acuity, etc.
It was a rather neat little idea to be honest![]()
That is a rather cool idea!
There needs to be a bit of substance beyond the gimmick.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.