• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

TOS Dreadnought USS Victory

calamity_si

Commander
Red Shirt
I always liked the 3-nacelled Franz Joseph original but I could definitely see room for improvement on it. So, here's my version.

uss_victory_ncc_2101__haynes_style_plans_by_calamitysi-d8xg2w6.jpg


uss_victory_ncc_2101__angled_views__by_calamitysi-d8wwsbr.jpg



Credit goes to Spockboy for all Sepia Trek related images
if_he_tries_to_get_away_with_warp_drive____by_calamitysi-d8y5ety.jpg
__would_you_look_at_that______by_calamitysi-d8wwvmm.jpg
en_route_to_victory__by_calamitysi-d8xy9x0.jpg
 
Last edited:
I like it very much, except for the cone shaped front on the secondary hull supporting the deflector dish.
 
Is the third nacelle just for look or is there a practical purpose?
It's based on the original Franz Joseph design from the 70's, the Federation-Class Dreadnaught, which had a third engine. IIRC, the idea was that adding additional engines to the system would increase the ability for the ship to warp space around it, making it "move faster" than double-engine ships. Roddenberry decanonized it when he put out his "laws of starship design", one of which mentioned that starships may only have engines "in pairs", and in full view of each other, unobstructed by other hull structures. I'm paraphrasing, but that's the general gist. FJ's Saladin-Class Destroyer and Hermes-Class Scout suffered a similar apocryphal fate at the hands of Roddenberry's infamous memo typewriter.

As for later TNG-based designs that seem to violate the "in pairs" rule, like the "All Good Things" Enterprise-D and the "Best of Both Worlds" Niagara and Freedom, it has been postulated that all Galaxy-style "star drive" engines have twin warp coils in them. This is evidenced by two distinct red lights in the Bussard collector in the front of each nacelle. So, ships like the regular TNG Enterprise-D actually have the equivalent of 4 TOS-era nacelles and the "All Good Things" version technically had 6, not 3.

The Hutzel kitbash from DS9 has Excelsior-style engines and could be argued that it has upgraded nacelles with twin coils as well in the post-transwarp era.

Explaining away the single- and three-engine ships in the new JJ Abrams movies are easier:
A) They are all likely operating under different technical and physical principals than their Prime-Universe counterparts as evidenced by their beer-brewery engine room and massive spherical warp reactor (and a larger amount of pulse-phaser vs. beam-phaser weapons),
B) They are considerably bigger than their Prime-Universe counterparts and have plenty of room for twin coils, and most importantly...
C) They don't give 2 rat-turds in a rain barrel about Roddenberry's bullshit laws of starship design.

:D
 
Last edited:
Roddenberry decanonized it when he put out his "laws of starship design", one of which mentioned that starships may only have engines "in pairs", and in full view of each other, unobstructed by other hull structures. I'm paraphrasing, but that's the general gist. FJ's Saladin-Class Destroyer and Hermes-Class Scout suffered a similar apocryphal fate at the hands of Roddenberry's infamous memo typewriter.

Undercut by 2009's Kelvin !

And possibly by the Armstrong a little later ?
 
^^^ I added some extra stuff on my post addressing that.

And, yes, good design BTW. Although I, too, am not sure I like the cone on the secondary hull either. But hey, it's your design, Calamity. Nice work either way.
 
Cheers guys. Just to address the issue of the nose cone section; I simply thought that it looked cooler than the standard dreadnought. I certainly was never a fan of the shuttlebay being situated above the main deflector dish and I wanted my variant to be a bit sleeker. Kinda like a forerunner to the Excelsior class.
 
The main difference between FJ dreadnought and this one is the third nacelle placement.

This design, all three nacelles are mounted on the secondary hull.

FJ had his third nacelle atop the primary hull. In the event of a hull separation, each hull would have warp engine nacelle. FJ's dreadnought could seemingly separate into a Saladin-destroyer vessel independent of the secondary hull.
 
Is the third nacelle just for look or is there a practical purpose?
It's based on the original Franz Joseph design from the 70's, the Federation-Class Dreadnaught, which had a third engine. IIRC, the idea was that adding additional engines to the system would increase the ability for the ship to warp space around it, making it "move faster" than double-engine ships. Roddenberry decanonized it when he put out his "laws of starship design", one of which mentioned that starships may only have engines "in pairs", and in full view of each other, unobstructed by other hull structures. I'm paraphrasing, but that's the general gist. FJ's Saladin-Class Destroyer and Hermes-Class Scout suffered a similar apocryphal fate at the hands of Roddenberry's infamous memo typewriter.

As for later TNG-based designs that seem to violate the "in pairs" rule, like the "All Good Things" Enterprise-D and the "Best of Both Worlds" Niagara and Freedom, it has been postulated that all Galaxy-style "star drive" engines have twin warp coils in them. This is evidenced by two distinct red lights in the Bussard collector in the front of each nacelle. So, ships like the regular TNG Enterprise-D actually have the equivalent of 4 TOS-era nacelles and the "All Good Things" version technically had 6, not 3.

The Hutzel kitbash from DS9 has Excelsior-style engines and could be argued that it has upgraded nacelles with twin coils as well in the post-transwarp era.

Explaining away the single- and three-engine ships in the new JJ Abrams movies are easier:
A) They are all likely operating under different technical and physical principals than their Prime-Universe counterparts as evidenced by their beer-brewery engine room and massive spherical warp reactor (and a larger amount of pulse-phaser vs. beam-phaser weapons),
B) They are considerably bigger than their Prime-Universe counterparts and have plenty of room for twin coils, and most importantly...
C) They don't give 2 rat-turds in a rain barrel about Roddenberry's bullshit laws of starship design.

:D

Thank you
 
Is the third nacelle just for look or is there a practical purpose?

At the time FJ did the 1 and 3 nacelle ships (late 60s, early 70s prior to TMP), the engines were the power source for the starship. The original idea was drawn from the old prop planes and newly developed jet aircraft. The larger the aircraft, the more props or jets.

It was only from TMP onward that reworked the power source into a central warp core that directed the power into the nacelles to warp space.
 
Fascinating! I like the explanation given for the third nacelle in the book 'Dreadnought'. I actually got all the background info on the dreadnought USS Star Empire and used it for the Victory. Mainly because it made the dreadnought sound really kick-ass! I was really disappointed with the FJ dreadnought description, which made the ship out to be slow, expensive to operate and with little more size and firepower than a Constitution class heavy cruiser. Anyways, here's a rundown on the USS Victory:http://calamitysi.deviantart.com/art/USS-Victory-NCC-2101-Angled-Views-539006823
 
Awesome Spockboy! So glad that you have seen this ship as it was entirely your Sepia Trek video that inspired me to build it...so really this dreadnought is totally your fault! lol
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top