• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Star Trek: Strange New Worlds 1x10 - "A Quality of Mercy"

Hit it!


  • Total voters
    315
There were plenty of debates about canon in those days. What wasn't debated was the fact that everyone knew Star Trek books were not canon so there was no need to worry about what was in them.

I recall things quite differently. Back when the only thing on screen were TOS reruns and the occasional TOS film, there were things like the early novels, comics, RPGs like FASA and Star Fleet Battles, and of course Franz Joseph’s Tech Manual that fleshed out the Star Trek universe in a myriad of ways. And no one was yelling on some internet bulletin board (because there was no internet) that such-and-such was violating 'canon' because canon wasn't even in the Star Trek public lexicon at the time. No novel or role-playing game contradicted anything, because there was little to nothing to contradict. The only thing 'canon' at the time was a movie every two years in the early '80's. And many fans were accepting the information from the novels, RPGs and such as official before TNG premiered, because they were licensed by Paramount, and no one in authority was telling them otherwise. All that changed when Gene Roddenberry became executive producer of TNG.

President Bacco would like a word

Was Bacco a character that Duane and Ford created in one of their novels circa 1980?
 
Last edited:
Was Bacco a character that Duane and Ford created in one of their novels circa 1980?

No, it was one created by the more modern world builders in the post-Nemesis pre-Picard era who were doing some serious Trek worldbuilding in their books. Which was then completely ignored* when Picard was produced.

All this has happened before, and it will all happen again.


(*well not quite -- as they were an interconnected timeline of stories we did get a grandiose closure trilogy. And some concepts were picked up)
 
All this has happened before, and it will all happen again.

Quite so. Or to put it another way:
There is nothing new under the sun. It has all been done before.
-- Sherlock Holmes, (where "canon" was first popularized in a secular usage), paraphrasing Ecclesiastes 1:9 (in the book that was the original usage of "canon"), in Conan Doyle's A Study in Scarlet.

And let's face it, the number of ST screenwriters willing to go out of their way to "canonize" elements of TrekLit are probably outnumbered by those actively hostile to TrekLit, and both are most definitely overwhelmingly outnumbered by Those. Who. Do. Not. Give. A. Rodent's. Defecatory. Orifice. One. Way. Or. The. Other. About. TrekLit.
 
Rewatching this one. There are some fuzzy patches of logic, which rarely bother me much, but I like it quite a bit. And I like Kirk a lot better each time I see it.

A lot of good character work.

Apparently, in combination with with a scene on STD set in the 32nd century, this episode confirms Star Trek in total to be the Saga of Spock. :lol:
 
Last edited:
Rewatching this one. There are some fuzzy patches of logic, which rarely bother me much, but I like it quite a bit. And I like Kirk a lot better each time I see it.

A lot of good character work.

Apparently, in combination with with a scene on STD set in the 32nd century, this episode confirms Star Trek in total to be the Saga of Spock. :lol:
Well...it settles the "Who is the Star of STAR TREK?" question nicely. :whistle:;)
 
Thinking it over 2 years later (almost), I think it would have been better if it was just Present Pike witnessing what Future Pike did, instead of Present Pike being sent to the future without any context.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top