Oh? Did I miss some fan fictionKes has had a lot of sex

Oh? Did I miss some fan fictionKes has had a lot of sex
I just find it hard to believe that any of the characters we've seen in Trek ever have sex.
Except maybe Nimoy's Spock.
I just find it hard to believe that any of the characters we've seen in Trek ever have sex.
Except maybe Nimoy's Spock.
I'm sorry, I'm not very familiar with the American rating system, but isn't PG-13 reserved for the movies showed in the cinema? Don't Tv shows use TV Parental Guidelines rating system? And, anyway, I thought the MMPA decided what is appropriated for a PG-13 movie, not the authors (who sometimes have to cut their film to get the rating, so probably they aren't the best judges of what is "PG").
I have mixed fillings about sex in Star Trek. I wonder how the first couple seasons of TNG would have been like if they didn't have to adhere to standards and practices. Remember the episode "Justice"? Yowza! I actually think Roddenberry would have went for nudity in Trek if he could have gotten away with it.
But... just for the sake of preventing internet/social media uproar, I'm glad they're not going to do it.
Also, just as a shocker, many people often are naked under their clothes.The problem with sex in general in media is that its objectified way too often. We giggle about it with our friends when we're younger and we don't necessarily grow out of it and Hollywood takes advantage of that. But sex is a part of life. To put it bluntly: Most everybody fucks. (Unless they've taken vows to not do so or choose not to.) This will not change in the 23rd century. If there is sex in Discovery, and I have a strong feeling there will be, My hope is they can treat it as adult (not meaning porn) as between two partners (or more) in a way that makes sense not JUST to have sex on Star Trek. We don't want that giggling quotient. Its too much.
Also, just as a shocker, many people often are naked under their clothes.
Further news as this develops.
Well, @Campe98 as with most of these stories, it came from the most unlikeliest of places...the TSA. At first it seemed a cruel joke, that scanners were making up images for laughs, and then it escalated from there.I have a second source who confirms -- Human beings in fact naked under our clothes. We now take you live to our roaming reporter, @fireproof78 , with more. Fireproof, how did we come to this discovery? One would think that we would know this all along--
Wait a minute! This just in! A group is protesting suggesting that any nudity, even under ones clothes, is in fact sacrilege! Anything to add, Fire?
If that's as bad as it gets, I will be delighted.
Also, just as a shocker, many people often are naked under their clothes.
Unless they're Changelings . . . .
That would explain Barbie dolls. They were made by Changeling infiltrators to brainwash our youth!Unless they're Changelings . . . .
nomen est omen, indeedAnd now we're going to have a whole show named STD.
I've heard that one of Roddenberry's ideas for TMP was that casual nudity would be commonplace in everyday life on Earth among advanced and enlightened humanity, as we would have evolved past our primitive notions of modesty.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.