They are great for in the city, but only if you are single and shop for one person alone, otherwise you'd need a second car, If I was single, stayed in a city and wanted easy to park + wanted to save the earth I'd opt for the New Ford Fiesta with the diesel engine, they can return over 75 mpg and look so much better than the smart.
Well, look at what people have been saying in this thread so far:
a) It's good for parking.
b) It doesn't really have good gas mileage for its size and price.
c) It's very small so you can't put too much in it (groceries etc).
d) I wouldn't drive it on an interstate/outside of a city.
What do you get? A car for relatively rich or at least upper middle class people living in cities who do a good part of their driving in said cities which actually fits quite nicely as a second car.
I think that this car fits its target market quite well. The only question remaining is whether there's enough of a market to turn a profit and that's a completely different question.
Some of you are basically saying "this isn't the type of car I need or want."
That is perfectly fine.
Personally, I live in a city where a bridge is the highest elevation you're going to get in a hundred kilometers and it snows on average five days a year. For example, why would I need a 4x4 SUV?
I don't say that an SUV is a car no one would ever need because I do not, so I do wonder why some of you can't seem to accept that there may be people for whom a Smart car makes sense.
If there aren't enough of those people, Daimler will stop making them. Free markets and all that. Simple, no?