• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Roswell (1999-02) Any fans?

Okay, I said to me "No, you're not gonna ask this", but... sorry, Mr. Cox, I can't help myself: As a person, who wants to be an author, I have to ask this question: How did you land this "Roswell tie-in-novel" gig? Do you need to have your fair share of non-tv-show-related-publications? Can you just apply for it? And does this work in Star Trek, too?

And Belle was a cool role, now wasn't she? The chemistry between her and Rumple/the Croc / the Dark One / Renard was good, at least I thought that.

Short answer: I don't think there's one standard route to becoming a media tie-in writer. Like most careers, the hard part is getting your foot in the door, then one job leads to another until, hopefully, you build up a nice resume and network of connections.

In my case, I had already been working as a writer/editor in SF publishing for a few years before I started getting offered tie-in work: first a couple of BATMAN stories for DC, then a DS9 novel, a couple of IRON MAN novels for Marvel, etc. While also working full-time as an SF editor for Tor Books.

Eventually I segued from being a full-time editor who wrote tie-ins on the side to becoming a full-time writer who still did some book editing on the side.

In the case of ROSWELL, let it be noted that the Roswell books were produced by the same publisher who was doing the Star Trek books, so I was already on their radar. One job leading to another . . . .

Hope that makes sense.

I should also mention that such projects are almost never initiated by the writer. They typically begin with a publisher acquiring a license, then recruiting writers for the project.

"Hey, Greg, we just acquired the ALIAS license. What's your schedule like?"

As opposed to me applying to write an ALIAS novel.

In general, you want to make a name for yourself as a writer, then let it be know that you're interested in tie-in work.
 
Short answer: I don't think there's one standard route to becoming a media tie-in writer. Like most careers, the hard part is getting your foot in the door, then one job leads to another until, hopefully, you build up a nice resume and network of connections.

In my case, I had already been working as a writer/editor in SF publishing for a few years before I started getting offered tie-in work: first a couple of BATMAN stories for DC, then a DS9 novel, a couple of IRON MAN novels for Marvel, etc. While also working full-time as an SF editor for Tor Books.

Eventually I segued from being a full-time editor who wrote tie-ins on the side to becoming a full-time writer who still did some book editing on the side.

In the case of ROSWELL, let it be noted that the Roswell books were produced by the same publisher who was doing the Star Trek books, so I was already on their radar. One job leading to another . . . .

Hope that makes sense.

I should also mention that such projects are almost never initiated by the writer. They typically begin with a publisher acquiring a license, then recruiting writers for the project.

"Hey, Greg, we just acquired the ALIAS license. What's your schedule like?"

As opposed to me applying to write an ALIAS novel.

In general, you want to make a name for yourself as a writer, then let it be know that you're interested in tie-in work.
That does make sense. So, in short, I don't walk up to - say - Paramount and say "Good afternoon, how're you doing? My name's Cal Cat and I'd love to write some Star Trek tie-in-novels for you." *sighs* Actually, I should've known, since that would be far too easy. ^^
 
Just the chupabra idea. And maybe some sort of time-travel story?

But I remember they were all more SF-oriented than LOOSE ENDS, which I thought was funny because they approached me in the first place because I was a Star Trek writer who, presumably, knew how to write SF.

Then they went with the story about a fugitive gunman. :)
Maybe they just really liked doing a story that tied into the pilot episode? It is one of the better episodes of the series.
I also remember that, because of a super-tight deadline, I had to write that book in a month!
I have been to writers' conferences and heard stories like this. :beer:

Back in the day when the show ended, there were rumors that S3 was supposed to be 22 episodes but cut to 18 when cancelled. Three episodes scrapped; a 2-hour script filmed as a 1-hour finale. I think one episode was gonna be time travel, one focusing on Jesse dealing with Isabel being an alien, and the third episode... I can't remember. Granted, this is 22 years ago, but do you have any idea what I am going on about? :lol:
 
I pay no attention to Disney and honestly couldn't tell you what is and is not a Disney production. I have Disney+ only because it's bundled with Hulu and allows me to watch the MCU stuff I don't have on disc, which is a lot, plus whatever I might stumble across that interests me. I've enjoyed shows from CBS and NBC, but ABC.... even as a kid, I just never really watched ABC shows except for those Friday night sitcoms. :shrug: Is OUaT friendly to viewers who may not be knowledgeable to the bulk of what the show is based on? I've never been one for fairytales, even as a kid. The show looks good, but I fear it would be constantly leaving me in the dark. :vulcan:
It was separate from the movies and did it's own take on the original stories, so it gives you everything you need to follow it's story lines, but you'd probably miss out on a lot of the references and callbacks to the movies and original fairy tales. So it's definitely not going to have as much impact if you don't know who characters if you don't know the original source material, since a big part of the appeal is seeing all of the different characters they brough into it.
 
It was separate from the movies and did it's own take on the original stories, so it gives you everything you need to follow it's story lines, but you'd probably miss out on a lot of the references and callbacks to the movies and original fairy tales. So it's definitely not going to have as much impact if you don't know who characters if you don't know the original source material, since a big part of the appeal is seeing all of the different characters they brough into it.
I feel like it'd be watching Galaxy Quest without know Star Trek. :eek:
 
I don't think it would be quite that extreme. It's not anywhere near as reliant on knowledge of the source material as Galaxy Quest was. It just would have as much of an impact as if you were more familiar with the stories and movies.
 
Last edited:
It's really not, you can't judge something by clips and reactions of the hardcore fans who are commenting on a place like that. The people who are posting clips are always going to be the hardcore fans who are posting the clips that had the biggest impact on them as fans. You really can't judge a 155 episode series on a few clips taken out of context, and the reactions of the hardcore fans are the worst ways to judge something like this, since they're always going have more extreme responses to things.
 
It's really not, you can't judge something by clips and reactions of the hardcore fans who are commenting on a place like that. The people who are posting clips are always going to be the hardcore fans who are posting the clips that had the biggest impact on them as fans. You really can't judge a 155 episode series on a few clips taken out of context, and the reactions of the hardcore fans are the worst ways to judge something like this, since they're always going have more extreme responses to things.
That's how I found House, though. With movies, I'm more likely to dive in blind. With a series, kind of a time commitment, so I watch trailers and clips to see if it's something I want to see or not. With OUAT, worth checking out further? It was a BIG show when it was new. :D
 
That's how I found House, though. With movies, I'm more likely to dive in blind. With a series, kind of a time commitment, so I watch trailers and clips to see if it's something I want to see or not. With OUAT, worth checking out further? It was a BIG show when it was new. :D

I really don't understand why you keep asking for recommendations and then just dismiss them when you get them. You can't judge a decent television episode by a few clips or even a few random episodes. Most memorable shows take some time to find their footing, and other shows start off great and then sizzle out like most of the shows in the Arrowverse. TNG took two years of watching mostly mediocre episodes before it became good. Some shows have great seasons in the middle of a long run (Supernatural for example).

The bottom line is that if you are going to ask for people to recommend shows or books or music or movies to you then at least pretend to be grateful when they go out of their way to do so.
 
I really don't understand why you keep asking for recommendations and then just dismiss them when you get them.
Did I dismiss OUAT? No. I asked questions. :beer:
You can't judge a decent television episode by a few clips or even a few random episodes.
Sure I can, it's how I've been picking movies for 20 years.
Most memorable shows take some time to find their footing, and other shows start off great and then sizzle out like most of the shows in the Arrowverse.
I generally give a TV show about 1-5 episodes to catch my interest. If I'm not sold by the 5th episode, I bail.
TNG took two years of watching mostly mediocre episodes before it became good.
For me, the show is good from the word go. "Encounter at Farpoint" is an excellent premiere.:klingon:
Some shows have great seasons in the middle of a long run (Supernatural for example).
Meh, if the first season is weak, I've zero interest in continuing. Show's gotta open strong or I don't stick around.
The bottom line is that if you are going to ask for people to recommend shows or books or music or movies to you then at least pretend to be grateful when they go out of their way to do so.
I have, you're just complaining to complain.:shrug:
 
I really don't understand why you keep asking for recommendations and then just dismiss them when you get them. You can't judge a decent television episode by a few clips or even a few random episodes. Most memorable shows take some time to find their footing, and other shows start off great and then sizzle out like most of the shows in the Arrowverse. TNG took two years of watching mostly mediocre episodes before it became good. Some shows have great seasons in the middle of a long run (Supernatural for example).

The bottom line is that if you are going to ask for people to recommend shows or books or music or movies to you then at least pretend to be grateful when they go out of their way to do so.

This guy gets it.
 
The only CW dramas I have watched are the opening three episodes of the new Roswell via Netflix and the opening episodes of Superman & Lois at a friend's house. I've never been part of CW's target demographic. :shrug:

I would say then you absolutely need to go watch Supernatural, CW be damned, but you might find it insulting at times due to your strict religious beliefs.
 
I'd put the first season of Lost right up there as one of the best first seasons of any TV show ever. The sci-fi elements start out a little more subtle, but by the end it's full on blatant in your face sci-fi.
Have you watched Once Upon a Time? it's great and has Emily de Ravin in a big role/
Person of Interest does that too, and it turns into an absolutely fantastic show.
 
Person of Interest and Lost are two of my all time favorite shows and really stuck the landing--both had great endings. (Sue me if you don't agree.)
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top