Did Starfleet really need Kirk to assume command?
The movie doesn't provide enough characterization for Decker for us to know.Is he one of those by-the-book guys, who needs to hone his gut instincts?
How long was he lost below decks?Maybe. Problem with Decker was really his lack of experience as a captain. It explains why the bridge crew was so relieved when Kirk showed up on the bridge.
Yeah...no. Its fiction. If they need Decker to be the hero, he'll be the hero. Save the ship and the Earth.if it was just Decker while I think Uhura was on the Enterprise before Kirk even got involved, I think Decker's crew would have gotten killed obliterated. End of the Enterrprise and even of the movie just like that
To be honest, I never liked the trope that Spock always has to save the day in engineering. Scotty is supposed to be a miracle worker, but throughout the series and the films, we see Scotty unable to manage until Spock gets involved. It happens over and over and over again. It really makes Scotty look less than competent, IMHO.
Scotty was a great engineer and a really competent officer, it was only from the TNG era that engineers started to become engineering geniuses.To be honest, I never liked the trope that Spock always has to save the day in engineering. Scotty is supposed to be a miracle worker, but throughout the series and the films, we see Scotty unable to manage until Spock gets involved. It happens over and over and over again. It really makes Scotty look less than competent, IMHO.
Exactly. And that's why Kirk was correct when he said "my experience... five years out there dealing with unknowns like this" as justification for resuming command.My first thought was that, sure, Decker could’ve managed it… but then I realized that with him in command, when V’Ger grabs them in a tractor beam, Decker probably makes a direct phaser strike at the source of the beam. At which point V’Ger shrugs and swats them.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.