What’s with those links in your post?
"Enterprise" too advanced for 22nd Century
- Thread starter CaptainSpirk
- Start date
What’s with those links in your post?
Are they not working for you or are you too stupid to understand the message?
I’m not clicking them they look malicious
They aren't malicious. It's the fella from "Hot Fuzz" telling you "Don't Go being a Twat now!".
In other words, anyone who knows enough to call it the USS Frank Lin doesn't need the origins of the name explained to him.
Or in simpler terms, you're being a twat. Stop it.
I’m not being a “twat”.
It’s a pet peeve of mine when someone doesn’t use the proper name of something.
I get it from my father.
I’ve never seen that site before plus it has a bunch of random letters and such at the end of it, makes it look suspicious
That's the dictionary definition. Stop it.
How about you stop being rude and calling people names.
How about you behave yourself and stop blaming your condescending nitpicking on your father.
I’d like the Franklin more if the nacelles were closer to the NX-01’s, that they didn’t have such a size change from front to back.
All a person has to do is mute the volume of an episode and simply watch ENT, and look at that production. Forget about the exterior which doesn't represent TOS to come at all, but the eye test doesn't lie; it looks and feels 2 hundred years in advance from Kirk's universe. I can buy ENT being a prequel to JJTrek but as I've said it before, it's bad form for the Hollywood production to ignore what was done on TOS and go all out for ENT which the team created an interior which would make Scotty jealous.
They could've had a branching of the series where it leads to April or Pike but those numbskulls Berman and Braga refused to go there while bullsh*tting fans this is in the Kirk TOS universe. Gosh, it sounds familiar (DISCOVERY) but this pigeon kibble seems new for some Trekfans. Feh!
The front of that makes me think of the Discovery from 2001
Nope, not at all. One can easily imagine it being more primitive.
Well now, this cascade of personal insults, name-calling, and goading is impressive! Congratulations, you win a warning for trolling. Please endeavor to treat your fellow members with more courtesy in future.
Sorry. I think the Daedalus is a beautiful design. I've never understood why people think its ugly. Having said that the only acceptable design for the prequel Enterprise is the ringship as seen in TMP. There's just no valid reason for using anything else.
The Daedalus may not have the grace of its successors, but it's a very plausible design for an early, relatively low-tech spacecraft. The ideal shapes for pressure vessels in vacuum, the ones that distribute the pressures and tensions most evenly over their surfaces so they don't rupture along weak seams, are a sphere, a torus, and a cylinder with hemispheric ends. The Daedalus is a sphere and a cylinder, so it's a pretty logical design for a basic space vessel, one that doesn't have the benefit of advanced hull materials or structural integrity fields to make more elaborate shapes stable.
Besides, spheres are pretty. I would've liked to see more sphere-hulled ships in Starfleet.
Besides, spheres are pretty. I would've liked to see more sphere-hulled ships in Starfleet.
The ringship would be in a prequel to Enterprise.
A ring ship wouldn't make sense for the plot. Why would a solely human made engine use a vulcan design?
SImilar appearance, different design ethic. A central core with the engines, and the habitable section in a rotating ring for gravity.
