I don't remember Kirk crying every week on TOS. Star Trek Discovery seasons 3 to 5 came across more like TNG, with maybe some aspects of DS9 character wise....closer to TOS....
I don't remember Kirk crying every week on TOS. Star Trek Discovery seasons 3 to 5 came across more like TNG, with maybe some aspects of DS9 character wise....closer to TOS....
I don't remember Kirk crying every week on TOS. Star Trek Discovery seasons 3 to 5 came across more like TNG, with maybe some aspects of DS9 character wise.
OK, this "crying every week" is bullshit. Burnham was allowed to have emotions which, for me, was very honest. Can we just forget this massive exaggeration?I don't remember Kirk crying every week on TOS. Star Trek Discovery seasons 3 to 5 came across more like TNG, with maybe some aspects of DS9 character wise.
OK, this "crying every week" is bullshit. Burnham was allowed to have emotions which, for me, was very honest. Can we just forget this massive exaggeration?
IDIC except crying, amiright?The show is cancelled and done with, and we're STILL hung up on the crying??
13 minutes out of approx 50 hours in a show where real-life emotions were central to the story. As an old man whose emotions are fully developed, I loved it. I’m sorry you (and others) couldn’t."Crying every week" may not be literally true, but the crying was excessive. Especially in season 2 and the end of season 4.
13 minute compilation of Michael Burnham crying in S1-S5:
Just another example of the over melodramatic nature of the show.
Less than 1%. Oh, the melodrama!13 minutes out of approx 50 hours in a show where real-life emotions were central to the story. As an old man whose emotions are fully developed, I loved it. I’m sorry you (and others) couldn’t.
Repetition is the flaw.I'm throughly over crying being called a flaw. Might as well call Kirk's speeches a flaw, McCoy's irritation a flaw.
Mileage varies.Repetition is the flaw.
It's fine if it's something that's supposed to be routine, like the ship entering orbit, the crew beaming down to a planet, Kirk making a captain's log, you can show them every time and it never gets old. But (using my current favourite series as an example) if the hero ship gets heavily damaged by a superior force, only to be bailed out by the arrival of another ship, FOUR BLOODY EPISODES IN A ROW, then that that doesn't work for me. I'm bored of that now, learn a new trick.
I do feel like something was lost between Discovery Season 2 Pike and SNW Pike.
I didn't see a point, why would someone be in this subforum if they disliked the show?Missing a "I like neither" option...
The latest topics trend on the landing page... plus it's not like there aren't people that dislike PICARD on that show's sub...I didn't see a point, why would someone be in this subforum if they disliked the show?
I stopped kidding myself. I watched and defended Disco for 5 seasons but I started to hate it. SNW is better due to its episodic nature. Trek does better that way. DS9 and later ENT style of heavier continuity works great too, but the 10 episode movie just doesn't work most of the time for Trek. Too much filler content that barely moves the story but enough story content that you know that is the main dish. I hope Academy learns from this.I ran into someone on twitter trying to (erroneously) claim no-one who dislikes Discovery also likes SNW, and it got me curious how many people here are exactly that.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.