JM1776 said:
UnknownSample said: When a male actor has a form-fitting costume, no one has a problem with it.
Still, there's "form-fitting," and then there's religion revealing.
It is acceptable within the bounds of professionalism to wear attire that flatters, or even to a certain extent accentuates, the figure. That which exposes, enhances or otherwise unnecessarily draws attention to it is a step or two beyond propriety.
Anwar said: They did put Kes in a catsuit, only difference was that it wasn't as blatantly obvious as Seven's outfit nor was a lot of attention put on it.
UnknownSample said: Oooh, "professionalism", "propriety"? If the message of Star Trek had ever become "let's be reserved and proper", I'd have dumped it in a nanosecond, before it deadened my soul.
It's about openness and freedom, and how this doesn't have to get it in the way of the group pulling together in a disciplined way to save each other's lives, and accomplish necessary goals.
"Flatters" and "unnecessary" are entirely subjective.
7 of 9 you could make a special case of, you know, because when a costume actually goes up an actress's behind, one can definitely say there's possible sexism at work, or something. I defend it, but I can see the criticisms.
Before that.... the rather silly prejudicial term "catsuit" distorts the truth. Costumes are denounced as "catsuits" when a two-piece costume, you know, slacks and top that were similarly form-fitting, wouldn't have been criticized. The "catsuit" has become a sort of visual/costume cliche now, something assumed to be sexist, when we may just be talking about single-piece clothing. Which I like. They came up with a lot of nice designs for them over the years, on men and women. And no, they don't have to go up anything....
I'll die before I'll live in a 24th century where everyone's in baggy black overalls, and doesn't dress in a more 'alive' way than that. Literally....
I love Kira in her jumpsuit.
The difference between her and 7 is that 7 has different proportions. So, she's going to look different.
I also love that Mulgrew never gave in to whatever pressures were on her to emphasize her 'characteristics".
UnknownSample said: I was ... saying it's hypocritical ... Do you agree with the majority on everything? ... Anyway, I've just decided: never argue with the propriety police. They'll just give you a ticket.
PKTrekGirl said:
I mean, who wants to be faced with the fact that one of the main reasons you were cast in a part was the size of your tits?![]()
But a womans physical appearance, including the size of her tits are a primary part in almost all Hollywood castingPKTrekGirl said:
I mean, who wants to be faced with the fact that one of the main reasons you were cast in a part was the size of your tits?![]()
KitchenWitch said:
PKTrekGirl said:
I mean, who wants to be faced with the fact that one of the main reasons you were cast in a part was the size of your tits?![]()
And Chase wasn't?![]()
And damn them for doing so... It would have been soo much softer on the eyes if they would have constantly replaced the dabo girlsPKTrekGirl said:
Well, I think even Chase would admit that her boobs were the They made something out of Leeta, even though she was not intended to be anything but temporary eye-candy.
PKTrekGirl said:
They made something out of Leeta, even though she was not intended to be anything but temporary eye-candy.
KitchenWitch said:
PKTrekGirl said:
They made something out of Leeta, even though she was not intended to be anything but temporary eye-candy.
True.
Thing is, they made something out of Seven, too--and from the very beginning. She was never written as only T&A.
Unfortunately, Chase doesn't recognize *that*.
PKTrekGirl said:
But Seven was NEVER intended to to a secondary character.
THAT is the difference.
Leeta exceeded what she was originally intended to be. Seven did not.
Can you not see that what was originally expected out of Leeta was significantly LESS than what was expected out of Seven? And that Leeta exceeded what she was originally intended to be?
KitchenWitch said:
PKTrekGirl said:
They made something out of Leeta, even though she was not intended to be anything but temporary eye-candy.
True.
Thing is, they made something out of Seven, too--and from the very beginning.
PKTrekGirl said:
Then why did you say this?:
KitchenWitch said:
PKTrekGirl said:
They made something out of Leeta, even though she was not intended to be anything but temporary eye-candy.
True.
Thing is, they made something out of Seven, too--and from the very beginning.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.