as long as interior bulkheads aren't load-bearing members, then it would be possible. the two-engine room arrangement has the advantage of explaining the reused ER footage, especially the Scotty Grate Grab.Mytran;4033149[B said:BK613[/B]'s idea is a good way to combine the two Engine Rooms, although if you want to be accurate to the sets the season 1 version should be longer than than the later one. Unfortunately the Star Trek Magazine does not make this clear, since they were trying to argue that it was the same room, just with some refitting. Given their different room shapes this would be quite a feat of ... engineering![]()
Not sure if this was directed at me but my iso view doesn't do the EMM room's width justice; it is wider on the cross-section. it will probably be corrected the next time I mess with this image.Mytran;4033149However said:.[/I]
Mytran;4033149[B said:TIN MAN[/B] did a great multiple Engine Room setup recently - care to plug it again?![]()
Here's the linky...
http://i49.tinypic.com/2qjvup0.jpg
Keep in mind this was based on Shaw's internals, which he evidently has revised, but it's still workable, I guess?
The basic idea is very similar to BK613's, but with the addition of the TAS engine rooms and corresponding tube tunnel on the C/L.
as long as interior bulkheads aren't load-bearing members, then it would be possible.Mytran;4033149[B said:BK613[/B]'s idea is a good way to combine the two Engine Rooms, although if you want to be accurate to the sets the season 1 version should be longer than than the later one. Unfortunately the Star Trek Magazine does not make this clear, since they were trying to argue that it was the same room, just with some refitting. Given their different room shapes this would be quite a feat of ... engineering![]()
I quite agree. I'm strongly of the opinion that there were at least two Engine Rooms on the Enterprise.the two-engine room arrangement has the advantage of explaining the reused ER footage, especially the Scotty Grate Grab.
Not sure if this was directed at me but my iso view doesn't do the EMM room's width justice; it is wider on the cross-section. it will probably be corrected the next time I mess with this image.[/QUOTE]Mytran;4033149However said:.[/I]
Here's the linky...
http://i49.tinypic.com/2qjvup0.jpg
Keep in mind this was based on Shaw's internals, which he evidently has revised, but it's still workable, I guess?
The basic idea is very similar to BK613's, but with the addition of the TAS engine rooms and corresponding tube tunnel on the C/L.
Ooh I like that! Nice use of the TAS stuff.
Sometimes form must follow function...as long as interior bulkheads aren't load-bearing members, then it would be possible.Unfortunately the Star Trek Magazine does not make this clear, since they were trying to argue that it was the same room, just with some refitting. Given their different room shapes this would be quite a feat of ... engineering![]()
Possible, yes. Desirable?...
ER Comparison
I quite agree. I'm strongly of the opinion that there were at least two Engine Rooms on the Enterprise.the two-engine room arrangement has the advantage of explaining the reused ER footage, especially the Scotty Grate Grab.
well had some other thoughts about it as well, such as having the space under the EMM be open instead of enclosed on the new room side. And the corridor to the old room be normal corridor height, suggesting that it was originally an outer corridor..Actually, I thought it was fine!Not sure if this was directed at me but my iso view doesn't do the EMM room's width justice; it is wider on the cross-section. it will probably be corrected the next time I mess with this image.However, if set accuracy isn't too much of an issue for you then no problem and the layout is fine as it is. I particularly like the way you've left enough room for a proper sized Emergency Manual Monitor.
Yes, that is the other solution to this problem (and also the one that Franz Joseph adopted, so it's got a good history!) If nothing else, it solves the viewing issues.
Do you have an in-universe explanation as to the mechanical reasoning behind the tapering shape?
Thanks blssdwlf, the pics are coming up well now! Where did you get the information that the S2 room is taller? I must admit I mostly work in 2-D so haven't noticed!
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.