• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

another new season 2 trailer and poster

Huh? All we know was that in the 24th century (about 120 years after the events about to be shown in ST: D S2) - Section 31 wasn't generally known about by many in Starfleet. BUT, there have ALWAYS been people in Starfleet who knew and worked with Section 31 - especially during the Dominion War (in fact a well known Admiral who was also working with Sisko.)

Also, given Captain Pike's history (the Talosian incident) - he could have been made aware of Section 31 at some point after that, or again, given it's 120 years earlier, perhaps Section 31 wasn't as clandestine as it was by the 24th century.

Nothing remains static for all time. Things change.

Pike knowing about it doesn't bother me really. He's a legend in Starfleet even by this time. But there is no way Micheal and Ash should have casual knowledge of Section 31 (or that Georgiou should just be flashing the badge). If random enlisted officers know about Section 31, it would be basically impossible for it to be totally suppressed in history by the 24th century - presuming the Federation isn't actually a totalitarian state.
 
I see season two will still be The Michael Burnham show since her head is bigger than everyone else’s on the poster, including trek legends like Spock and Pike. Anyone expecting S2 to be any better than S1 while be disappointed....
I also find it amusing that the Enterprise is all over this poster when i wouldn't be shocked at all if she only appears in the first 30 seconds of Episode 1 when Pike beams over to the Discovery. Then we don't see her the rest of the season, lol.
 
I also find it amusing that the Enterprise is all over this poster when i wouldn't be shocked at all if she only appears in the first 30 seconds of Episode 1 when Pike beams over to the Discovery. Then we don't see her the rest of the season, lol.

We know that Micheal briefly goes over to Spock's quarters on Enterprise and looks around. We don't know if we get to see the bridge however.
 
If Section 31 decides to go underground, it's a "simple" matter of classifying all their previous work and scrubbing their name from the records where they can, a much easier task when virtually everything is networked and digital. The people who know about them don't talk about it (it's classified). In a couple decades, they are all but forgotten by anyone except those who they want to know. Officially they become an obscure defunct branch of Starfleet Intelligence that was shut down long ago. Only of interest to Starfleet trivia buffs.
 
How horrible they want to tell a sweeping story with a mix of action, adventure, and perhaps some contemplation here and there - the HORROR!
That would be Star Trek, yes. You seem to think a sweeping mix of action, adventure, and contemplation requires Galaxy Shattering Stakes for some reason. There's nothing wrong with Galaxy Shattering Stakes, but when every story has them, it gets samey, especially when you had no buildup. Trek generally has had seasons of Character Shattering Stakes or even Planet Shattering Stakes (and many Less Shattering Stakes) before getting to the One Big Thing, and even then, the OBT was generally a bit more amorphous - ie, the thing at stake is Peace Itself or Our Way of Life or Lots of Lives but generally not All Lives In The Universe (though DS9 was rather casual about that Proto-Universe).
 
You mean after three seasons of smaller stories? We have yet to get any smaller stories from Discovery. There's been no build-up, they just swing from one universal cataclysm to the next. They should have just had Discovery spore-drive home to deal with V'ger and the Whale Probe. Who the fuck needs the Enterprise?

What? You're now upset that they DIDN'T use the "Enterprise is the ONLY ship in range..." trope? Make up your mind. ;)

Are you seriously so upset because ST: D doesn't follow the 'planet of the week' of TNG? Also, you forgot to comment on my point about DS9. Also, I didn't but I could bring up Season 3 of "Enterprise" as well.

The point is: Like TNG changed the format of "What was Star Trek" for the 1980ies-1990ies; ST: D is doing for 2018.

Yes, it's trying to go the way of 'big stakes' serial story shows like "Game of Thrones" and "The Expanse", etc. It's the 'big spectacle' Star Trek show.

Want something smaller? Maybe the Picard show will fit your bill and you can watch him talk about the 'old days' on the 1701-D as nurses tend to him in the 'Old Captains/Admirals Home.' ;)
 
Last edited:
Is he? There was nothing in "The Cage" to indicate he was anything other than your average skipper.

I agree. But there was nothing during the TOS era that suggested Kirk was anything more than just a normal captain. The later shows made him into a legend in-universe as fanwank.

I dunno how much Pike was referenced in Berman Trek, but I remember in Season 1 Discovery listed Pike as one of the most decorated captains in Trek history (along with Georgiou, April, and Archer...yech!) Burnham also knew right away who he was when the Enterprise showed up. So the show has established he's a BFD.
 
That would be Star Trek, yes. You seem to think a sweeping mix of action, adventure, and contemplation requires Galaxy Shattering Stakes for some reason. There's nothing wrong with Galaxy Shattering Stakes, but when every story has them, it gets samey, especially when you had no buildup. Trek generally has had seasons of Character Shattering Stakes or even Planet Shattering Stakes (and many Less Shattering Stakes) before getting to the One Big Thing, and even then, the OBT was generally a bit more amorphous - ie, the thing at stake is Peace Itself or Our Way of Life or Lots of Lives but generally not All Lives In The Universe (though DS9 was rather casual about that Proto-Universe).

As long as I enjoy the ultimate story (and I don't know if I will or won't); no, the 'Galaxty Shattering Stakes' trope doesn't bother me as long as it's interesting.
 
I dunno how much Pike was referenced in Berman Trek, but I remember in Season 1 Discovery listed Pike as one of the most decorated captains in Trek history (along with Georgiou, April, and Archer...yech!)

I honestly take that graphic about as seriously as I take the show. As in, not at all.

The graphic actually represents another slip in the "this is all one universe" stuff. The NCC-1701 is the first Federation ship named Enterprise. They had to make the NX-01-era Starfleet an Earth organization in order to try and reconcile that. Now, Archer is being counted as a Federation Starfleet captain.

Burnham also knew right away who he was when the Enterprise showed up. So the show has established he's a BFD.

Her adopted brother is an officer on his ship. I imagine she would learn things about it either directly from him or from Amanda who shares family news.
 
It doesn't work that way, sorry. Besides, I'd be delighted if the biggest issue I had with Discovery was the size of someone's head on a poster.

My point is there is too much focus on Burnham, the worst character on the show. If they wanted to improve the show her part should have been scaled right back for S2. The poster makes it clear that she will still be the main character, which is the worst thing they could do. I think very few people tune into the show to see her....
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top