Im sure this has been asked before...but why did Scotty take the younglads corpse to the bridge instead of sickbay in STII?
Im sure this has been asked before...but why did Scotty take the younglads corpse to the bridge instead of sickbay in STII?
Think he was in shock.
Im sure this has been asked before...but why did Scotty take the younglads corpse to the bridge instead of sickbay in STII?
"Real" Answer: Scotty knew Preston was too far gone to be worth saving and he brought him to the bridge to prove a point to Kirk.
"Real" Answer: Scotty knew Preston was too far gone to be worth saving and he brought him to the bridge to prove a point to Kirk.
That's always been my interpretation as well, although some people don't like the idea that Scotty would be blaming Kirk for anything, least of all recklessness amounting to manslaughter.
I think Scotty was in emotional shock at the time.
He wouldn't. Besides, it doesn't fit in with the later scene in sickbay.
I think Scotty was in emotional shock at the time.
Again: no way. Not Scotty.
He wouldn't. Besides, it doesn't fit in with the later scene in sickbay.
I think Scotty was in emotional shock at the time.
Again: no way. Not Scotty.
Than what's your explanation for the scene?
Also, why not Scotty? Out of the regular TOS team, he was the character least impressed with young Kirk and his gung-ho ways, the one most likely to consider himself more knowledgeable in matters technical or tactical (even when acquiescing in face of Kirk's superior rank) - and definitely prone to histrionics whenever issues of social or personal nature touched him. If any of the TOS characters were to fall apart, the socially awkward and troubled Scott would be my very first bet.
Not to mention that the ship simply must have been full of people hating Kirk's guts at the time. A superior vessel reduced to a wreck by the carelessness of a has-been who had no business being aboard that ship to begin with, least of all in command, when the contingent of youngsters aboard would have warranted extra caution in all circumstances... It's a wonder Kirk's career didn't end there and then.
Anyway...it was Starfleet's fault. They sent the ship out to investigate a situation with a boatload of children.
I think Scotty was in emotional shock at the time.
Anyway...it was Starfleet's fault. They sent the ship out to investigate a situation with a boatload of children.
"Real" Answer: Scotty knew Preston was too far gone to be worth saving and he brought him to the bridge to prove a point to Kirk.
That's always been my interpretation as well, although some people don't like the idea that Scotty would be blaming Kirk for anything, least of all recklessness amounting to manslaughter.
OTOH, Scotty would probably know from experience that the likeliest place to find the Chief Surgeon would be on the bridge.
Timo Saloniemi
Also, why not Scotty? Out of the regular TOS team, he was the character least impressed with young Kirk and his gung-ho ways, the one most likely to consider himself more knowledgeable in matters technical or tactical (even when acquiescing in face of Kirk's superior rank) - and definitely prone to histrionics whenever issues of social or personal nature touched him. If any of the TOS characters were to fall apart, the socially awkward and troubled Scott would be my very first bet.
Not to mention that the ship simply must have been full of people hating Kirk's guts at the time. A superior vessel reduced to a wreck by the carelessness of a has-been who had no business being aboard that ship to begin with, least of all in command, when the contingent of youngsters aboard would have warranted extra caution in all circumstances... It's a wonder Kirk's career didn't end there and then.
Timo Saloniemi
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.