As long as we get to see a picture of Benjamin Sisko clearly labeled "Jean-Luc Picard" next to a diagram of the Enterprise-B, I'm all in for meeting 32nd century historians.Imagine reading 900 years of history, including how friends and families turned out, and perhaps having distant relatives in that far future, and being interviewed by historians who got everything wrong XD
Well considering Benjamin Sisko became Gabriel Bell (for real in Universe); hey, stranger things could happen.As long as we get to see a picture of Benjamin Sisko clearly labeled "Jean-Luc Picard" next to a diagram of the Enterprise-B, I'm all in for meeting 32nd century historians.
As long as we get to see a picture of Benjamin Sisko clearly labeled "Jean-Luc Picard" next to a diagram of the Enterprise-B, I'm all in for meeting 32nd century historians.
Imagine reading 900 years of history, including how friends and families turned out, and perhaps having distant relatives in that far future, and being interviewed by historians who got everything wrong XD
In cases like this I assume these are loan words, and are thus now part of Federation Standard and so aren't translated. Just like Schadenfreude or Samurai.
49th maybe.Future Historians: "Miley Cyrus was NOT the 47th President of the U.S.?"
[*Me, after thinking about it*]
"No, come to think of it I wouldn't be surprised if that's what happened."
Speaking as a historian, painfully aware of how rapidly records we thought to be secure can degrade, how rapidly data storage methods change and become obsolete, how little it sometimes takes for information to be lost, I wouldn't bet on us leaving as much evidence for future generations as we think we will. More, perhaps, than previous generations left for us, but not as much as we think we will.Our archives are very precise. It's likely that the historians of the future will know a great deal more about us than we do ourselves. Secret meetings, negotiations, secret services of all countries will no longer be a secret. Not to mention that they'll have tools that we can't even imagine.
49th maybe.
No more canon violations, just misunderstood historyAs long as we get to see a picture of Benjamin Sisko clearly labeled "Jean-Luc Picard" next to a diagram of the Enterprise-B, I'm all in for meeting 32nd century historians.
The weird choices for President only happen once every 30 or so years.
"Who's President of the United States in 1985?"
"Ronald Reagan."
"Ronald Reagan?! The actor?! HA!!!! Then who's Vice President? Jerry Lewis?!"
"Who's President of the United States in 2020?"
"Donald Trump."
"Donald Trump?! The Reality TV star?! HA!!!! Then who's Vice President? Jerry Seinfeld?!"
A rabid monkey flinging poo at a dartboard with policy decisions on it, and picking the policies the poo sticks to would be better that Trump. It would probably be more consistent too.Actually, Jerry Seinfeld would make a better vice-president than whatshisface.
A rabid monkey flinging poo at a dartboard with policy decisions on it, and picking the policies the poo sticks to would be better that Trump. It would probably be more consistent too.![]()
A thought...I feel bad for whoever was President of the Federation when The Burn happened.
The Herbert Hoover of the 31st Century and no FDR waiting in the wings.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.