• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Picard Prequel "Children of Mars"

I don't think we're ever gonna see those in live-action outside of cosplay. Modern Trek seems to have a different uniform for every ship in the Discovery-era (see: "The Trouble With Harry" for a third style) and I imagine they'll treat other eras the same, for merchandising reasons if nothing else.
You may be right that we won't see these in live action, but it's a shame because I think they look great.
 
Although it's possible they coexisted with the FC uniforms, Lower Decks is set in 2380 and features a new uniform style.
b3vFrD8.jpg
I'm expecting animated shows to be as semi/non-canon as TAS ;)
 
It doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me for a huge group of Romulan survivors to settle on a planet where they can't natively survive the conditions, when a ton of M-Class planets exist for them to settle.

What makes Mars non-M? Back in the 2150s, terraforming of the place was in full swing. And things have progressed since: in the 2370s, terraforming apparently was a successful industry, even if no doubt different locations would offer different challenges. And if we can now debate whether the planet targeted by an armada of apparent Romulan ships (and portrayed by Mars) is Mars or Vulcan, a bunch of Vulcanoids might well feel right at home there...

Timo Saloniemi
 
It doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me for a huge group of Romulan survivors to settle on a planet where they can't natively survive the conditions, when a ton of M-Class planets exist for them to settle.
MARS was being terraformed almost 300 years before. It stands to reason it can hold a population by the time of STP.
 
Just looking at the planet itself from space both in TNG and STP, it doesn’t look like it’s been terraformed at all. Was there ever dialogue stating this?
 
It would be interesting enough to find out whether Vulcanoids really love desert hellholes such as Vulcan and Mars and the Romulans hated every minute they spent on lush Romulus, or whether the original transplanting of the Vulcans on Vulcan was an act of punishment...

But yeah, "Terra Prime" was explicit about the lowlands already having enough atmosphere to only require warm clothing (and some oxygen...). And Vulcanoids are natural mountaineers!

Timo Saloniemi
 
Vulcan doesn't look much different, FWIW. But Mars was being terraformed back when Earthlings thought every Class M planet within reach was already taken, but for diabolical deathtraps like Terra Nova. The project might have been dropped like a cold potato when Archer showed the colonists The Way.

Timo Saloniemi
 
I hadn't heard about or noticed the Romulans on Mars in the trailer, so I was wondering how the title related to Picard.
There was a picture of Utopia Planitia in TNG, and it looks there's a fair amount of open space, so I'm thinking it's at least habitable enough to go outside by that time.
 
We saw Mars in BOBW, and it looked exactly like how it looks today.

There have always been inconsistancies with Luna and Mars like that. The Sol system should be absolutely littered with refueling stations, spaceports, repair docks, living quarters, mining areas, etc, throughout all the various satellite objects of big gas giants, throughout the asteroid belt, and all over mars and luna.

If they really wanted to get risky in the Sol system, they could have worked on terraforming Venus...
 
It has nothing to do with the planet Mars. Romulus and Remus were the sons oft the god Mars in Roman mythology.
This is the most likely answer. However I was hoping that it'd have something to do with Picards ancestors who help found the first Martian colonies.
 
There have always been inconsistancies with Luna and Mars like that. The Sol system should be absolutely littered with refueling stations, spaceports, repair docks, living quarters, mining areas, etc, throughout all the various satellite objects of big gas giants, throughout the asteroid belt, and all over mars and luna.

Would we notice? Space is big, and a million Spacedocks in medium orbit of Earth would still mean that getting two in the same shot would be phenomenally good luck.

The problem is sort of the opposite: in ST:FC, Riker claims that the Moon in full daylight ought to look different in the future. What could possibly result in this? Earth in daylight today looks pretty much the same it did before the invention of fire, from the distance of the Moon at least.

Thankfully, it's easy to argue Riker is just bullshitting Zep Cochrane there. The Commander speaks of "Lake Armstrong", which in theory might be a reflective body of water, only visible from dead above (aka dead below) on the daylit Moon - a vista we never enjoy in the 24th century, where the Moon is always seen from the side. Or then it's a Lake in the Luna sense, a basalt circle perhaps created in a mining accident of Kzinti attack or whatnot, and actually utterly insignificant except for the discerning/biased eye.

If they really wanted to get risky in the Sol system, they could have worked on terraforming Venus...

They were, as of "Past Tense". Probably not much of a priority, considering how easy it is to just pitch a tent on an empty Second Earth a few lightyears or warp-hours away. I wonder why they even bothered?

Timo Salomiemi
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top