dalehoppert said:
Another mention in this article of the freaking Academy setting... I'm sorry but if it turns out the TOS crew all went to the academy together like it was Star Trek High or something, I'm going to be disgusted.
"We're going on a training cruise and you all are the crew we've selected for this mission... Jimmy Kirk, you'll be in command... Nyota, you take communications... Ummm, Misters Sulu and Chekov, you take the helm and navigation positions...and our new Vulcan exchange student Spock here will be your first officer, Jimmy. Monty, you go run engineering..."![]()
My thoughts, exactly.
That's why I'm taking the casting list with a grain of salt. Even if it's the real age ranges desired for the actors, that doesn't mean that a 24 or 25 year old cast as Kirk couldn't play him at 30, or a 28 year old cast as McCoy couldn't do him at 36. IMO Quinton could pass for TOS era Spock right now even though he's five years younger than Nimoy was in 1966.
So, if Yelchin is Chekov, his age isn't that far from being able to pass for when Chekov was (FOR SURE) on Enterprise. And, the rest of the actors are playing even older ages.
Could be (COULD be) Abrams wants to cast young to get maximum believability (and energy) out of the actors in any subsequent movies. Cast a little young now, and if you want to do another TOS era movie in 2013 with the same cast, they won't be too long a tooth.
Let's say Kirk is supposed to be 30 in XI. If the actor cast for the role is 35 or 36, even though he can play 30 right now, there may be a problem if you want him to be Kirk at 32 in the 2013 movie.
Then again, it's a poor air quality day here, and that could be affecting my thinking.
