• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Just How Bad *IS* Harry Mudd? (TOS & Discovery)

Maurice

Snagglepussed
Admiral
The excellent Star Trek The Webcomic recently started a Harry Mudd story titled "Mudd Slide" (link), and in the comic's blog a poll was put up asking readers if they thought Harry Mudd was a murderer, given things he said on TOS and actions perhaps implied. Given that he's going to be brought back on Discovery, I thought it would be interesting to see what people thought about the same question.

The poll is here (link) on the comic's blog if you want to chime in in addition to posting here. But I'd be curious to hear people's thoughts on the topic.
 
I don't think anyone would discount him being a "bad guy". After all, the topic is "How Bad *IS*" not "Is He Bad".

Is there a difference between standing by and letting something happen and actually sticking a knife in someone? Did he, as the linked poll asks, actually kill Leo Walsh to use his ship? Is Harry capable of flat out murder?
 
Did he, as the linked poll asks, actually kill Leo Walsh to use his ship? Is Harry capable of flat out murder?

I always thought Leo Walsh was an alias. I should probably revisit "Mudd's Women" sometime soon. :eek:
 
xO1zMV7.jpg
Harry's rap sheet suggests a history of non-violent fraud offenses and paper crimes, motivated perhaps by behavioral or personality disorders. A con man, just as Roger C. Carmel (brilliantly over-) played him. So I don't see him as a cold-blooded murderer.

A black-comedy treatment of the circumstances of Captain Walsh's demise could be interesting. Especially if Mudd had the right kind of foil; a rogue half-Vulcanian, perhaps.
 
From Mudd's Women:
MUDD: All right. Well, very simply, Leo Walsh, who was to be my captain on this trip, passed away suddenly. Well, I had no choice but to take out me ship me own self. I assumed Leo's name out of courtesy to him. In memoriam, as it were. A fine, fine man, alas, gone to his reward.

It's possible that Mudd and Walsh were partners or that Mudd simply knew of Walsh and stole his ship when Walsh passed away quite suddenly. Perhaps Walsh was killed by someone other than Mudd and Mudd simply took advantage of the situation.
 
Running a dating site hands-on, you mean?

(I doubt misquoting Carmel's height was an innocent mistake, a case of not knowing in time who was gonna play Mudd etc. It's more a symptom of the times: villains get the short stick, heroes get boosted in height, women get younger and so forth, plausibility be damned.)

I think Mudd's two TOS appearances and his TAS one together leave plenty of room for treating him as an affable character whose crimes are a matter of interpretation, generally victimless and often moderated by the fact that he isn't in control despite very much wanting to be. Btu there's also room for revealing his possible ruthless side - it's not as if he needed to go particularly violent or evil in order to pull off his TOS and TAS schemes, after all. He could have plenty left in his spacious sleeve...

Timo Saloniemi
 
The preamble to the poll on the comic's blog includes this...
...Obviously Mr. Mudd is a human trafficker....He’s also perfect happy to see the Enterprise burn up with all hands on board, again, to secure his freedom. This is one flipping terrible human being.

But there’s one bit in “Mudd’s Women” that can be read as seriously evil, and that’s the fate of the real Leo Walsh. After the computer IDs Harry as his Harcourt Fenton self, he admits Walsh, who was the actual owner of the J-Class freighter...met an untimely fate and Mudd was forced to commandeer his vessel in order to complete his business transactions.

Now Mudd is nothing if not a liar, so there has to be more to this story then he’s willing to admit. The question is, did Mudd kill Walsh and take his ship, or did Leo really just keel over at an inopportune time?

Did Harry Mudd murder the real Leo Walsh?
So how bad is bad? Is there a level of illegality that even Mr. Mudd won't sink to?
 
And that's all biased beyond silly. Human trafficking? Oh, yeah, taxi drivers are such a despicable lot - they should immediately be gunned down, or at least forced to pay us for getting trafficked instead of taking payment. Willing to let Kirk's baby burn? That's all Kirk's doing - he wrecked his ship while trying to wreck Mudd's. All Mudd is saying is "sooner or later", and if Kirk wants to torch his ship, that's his choice.

I'd rather suspect Kirk of having Walsh assassinated so that he could entrap poor Harry...

Timo Saloniemi
 
I'd rather suspect Kirk of having Walsh assassinated so that he could entrap poor Harry...

When you consider what Kirk did to poor Mr. Hengist—that trumped-up, fact-free show trial to save his friend, the murderous Montgomery Scott—you might be onto something.
 
His height is listed a little short, there. Roger C. Carmel was at least 6'4".

Mudd was officially 6'1". Much like warp factors, middle initials, and British/French accents; height measurement scales have been altered over the years.
 
I'm convinced that Leo Walsh was just Mudd's fake ID he used to get a master's licence, seeing as his own was revoked. He never killed anyone. He's a crooked businessman and scam artist, not a murderer.

Neither is he a human-trafficker by any modern definition. Kirk asks him point-blank if the women are there of their own free will and they admit that they are. Mudd's crimes in "Mudd's Women" are all about unfiled flight plans and improperly licenced vehicles. He's a small time criminal at best.

In the end Kirk doesn't even take him seriously, jokingly offering to be a character witness at his trial. So if Mudd really was a big deal murderer/slave trader/pimp, I'm sure Kirk would have dealt with him a bit more harshly.

--Alex
 
I never understood why anyone could think that "Mudd's Women" was about human trafficking. Harry knew there were a bunch of lonely miners who wanted wives, and so he found some women who wanted husbands and set the two groups up for a chat. In what way is that trafficking? Matchmaking, sure, but that's legal.

I mean, nobody seriously thinks Here Come The Brides was trafficking, right? That's the same thing. The Mercer Girls weren't victims, and neither were the women in this episode. As @Albertese pointed out, they were absolutely willing participants. They weren't being forced. They could have backed out at any time.

As for Leo Walsh: I agree that it must have been fake (as was the ridiculously over-the-top accent). Harry IS a con artist and surely has access to fake IDs.

And...drugs? Gimme a break. :rolleyes: Anybody who thinks Harry was a drug dealer clearly didn't finish the episode. The Venus drug was FAKE!
 
Last edited:
OTOH, if Mudd's any good at what he's doing, he could well play "harmless Harry" to the hilt and hide his prowess with the sonic knife...

There's more potential to a lying scumbag like this than there's to the straight guy Cyrano Jones, that is, more hidden potential. It's not as if TOS or TAS would have established Baltar-style cowardice as a basic Mudd trait - if he's afraid in "I, Mudd", it's for a good reason.

Timo Saloniemi
 
Last edited:
...
And...drugs? Gimme a break. :rolleyes: Anybody who thinks Harry was a drug dealer clearly didn't finish the episode. The Venus drug was FAKE!

Was it Fake? I understood that Mudd had the real deal and that he revealed to Eve in the end that Kirk had confiscated his and replaced it with colored gelatin.

OTOH, Kirk's fakes seemed to have the same effect on Eve, so maybe the Venus Drug is mostly placebo anyway; the powdered rhino horn of the 23rd Century.

--Alex
 
No, I'm fairly sure that Kirk didn't substitute one version of the drug for another. There never was a "real" Venus drug - it was always just a placebo.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top