Hi Jayru did you ever do the NX version of the Excelsior?
I didn't, but I could adapt the current model I have to be the NX version with a little work.
More on the
Challenger study;
(Again, nods to Bill Krause and Todd Guenther).
My thinking:
Starfleet didn't just build one ship to test out the Transwarp Drive. They would have built several in different configurations to work out the best way forward with this new technology. That means that experimentally, at least, the Transwarp Drive worked. Now, I've maintained for years that the drive wasn't an outright failure but rather paved the way for the TNG warp scale, with its absolute of Warp 10. When I was posting on the FRS many (many) moons ago, I had this discussion with Aridas Sofia and Todd Guenther. I think they broadly liked my compromise that the
Excelsior wasn't a failure but didn't quite succeed as it should have.
In a nut shell, my thinking was that the Transwarp Drive had "peak transitions" as you went faster, and that at some stage the Warp Scale was aligned to fit with those observed "peak transitions." This is how we can have the TOS
Enterprise hit warp 14 in one episode, but warp 10 becomes an absolute later in TNG.
It's an idea, at least. Maybe worth consideration? Not the place for the discussion.
Now, as for the
Challenger - this ship was a testbed for several systems proposed for the
Excelsior, including a prototype Transwarp Drive system. The
Challenger, unlike the
Enterprise, was designed to hit warp 14 and not fall apart.
Did it succeed?
That's a story in itself.
Anyways, comments welcome, and more soon.