Okay, so help me out here guys. I need to know if I'm totally out in left field with this one or not.
I was having an argument with a friend, a very good friend actually. We've actually been romantically involved in the past, but right now we're just good friends. We have similar TV and music tastes, we think in the same ways about a lot of stuff. We basically just totally *get* each other on a lot of levels, and so we are similar in a lot of ways which is great...except one of those ways is that we are both immensely stubborn. Neither of us will give up an argument or let anything go, and both have to have the last word. As you can imagine this can be..volatile.
So we're arguing over something really trivial but that got blown out of proportion. Basically, I tend to suggest that she see certain movies. I am a big movie buff and she's been pretty sheltered as to what she's seen. She will say no, that she doesn't want to see it. I ask why not, because I think she'd like it. She accuses me of forcing it onto her, but I just want to know a logical reason why she doesn't want to see it...and the argument ensues.
So tonight, we were arguing over the fact that I "harass" her about it. Long story short, she used a really bad anology (comparing movies to cigarettes) and when I didn't see the validity of her comparison, she said "youre such an idiot"
Which may not seem like a lot to some, but this girl has *never* called me a name before. Nor have I ever called her anything. So this came as a bit of a shock.
Her defense when I called her on it? She says she's wanted to call me names in the past, and held back. And she wanted to call me worse names than "idiot" but held back...
...as if that makes this one time justified?
Am I really supposed to just take it and shrug it off just because she *could have* said more? And on more occasions? I don't think so!
I might be totally blowing *this* out of proportion because I'm still mad. She did apologize but it was the very forced, insincere apology of someone who just wants the other person to shut up. Anyway, am I totally off base here or am I right in that she can't justify it like that?
I was having an argument with a friend, a very good friend actually. We've actually been romantically involved in the past, but right now we're just good friends. We have similar TV and music tastes, we think in the same ways about a lot of stuff. We basically just totally *get* each other on a lot of levels, and so we are similar in a lot of ways which is great...except one of those ways is that we are both immensely stubborn. Neither of us will give up an argument or let anything go, and both have to have the last word. As you can imagine this can be..volatile.
So we're arguing over something really trivial but that got blown out of proportion. Basically, I tend to suggest that she see certain movies. I am a big movie buff and she's been pretty sheltered as to what she's seen. She will say no, that she doesn't want to see it. I ask why not, because I think she'd like it. She accuses me of forcing it onto her, but I just want to know a logical reason why she doesn't want to see it...and the argument ensues.
So tonight, we were arguing over the fact that I "harass" her about it. Long story short, she used a really bad anology (comparing movies to cigarettes) and when I didn't see the validity of her comparison, she said "youre such an idiot"
Which may not seem like a lot to some, but this girl has *never* called me a name before. Nor have I ever called her anything. So this came as a bit of a shock.
Her defense when I called her on it? She says she's wanted to call me names in the past, and held back. And she wanted to call me worse names than "idiot" but held back...
...as if that makes this one time justified?
Am I really supposed to just take it and shrug it off just because she *could have* said more? And on more occasions? I don't think so!
I might be totally blowing *this* out of proportion because I'm still mad. She did apologize but it was the very forced, insincere apology of someone who just wants the other person to shut up. Anyway, am I totally off base here or am I right in that she can't justify it like that?