The whole Starfleet technical hygiene or whatever Burnham called it was non-sense. And the idea that Starfleet went back to the Shenzhou and collected the telescope but left a key piece of tech and then didn't even investigate T'Whothehellcares ship is a real head scratcher.
It is a part of the whole "weak story but we give you too many cool gimmicks".My main issues with the writing on DSC don't extend to minor quibbles like the telescope.
Not all the answers are going to apparent right away perhaps there is an intentional reason as to why the audience was not told how the telescope was recovered
But, overall, the story is a mess. Maybe you can tell me why it is smart writing to retrieve a telescope yet leave the exact piece of equipment that the Klingons need to restore power to their ship? Why it was smart writing for the Klingons to just float there for six months? Why it was smart writing for Starfleet not to investigate the ship that can appear and disappear that is laying a few thousand kilometers from the Shenzhou and in their territory? Why it left the Shenzhou floating when they are supposed to have impeccable technical hygiene?
When the Shenzou lost power during the fight, the ship (not the asteroids around the ship, but only the ship) was getting dragged into the binary's accretion disk and had to be rescued by Europa.
Right, the asteroids are falling inward slowly as a function of orbital velocity. The ships weren't orbiting the stars, they were holding position relative to the binary stars and one another. Once they lost power, they should have gotten sucked into the accretion disk. And yeah, the scary jumble of rocks makes for a great visual, but not so much good science.OK, now I'm no scientist, but here goes..... The asteroids don't get pulled in due to their mass - the same reason why the moon doesn't get pulled down to the earth...
Now that you mention it, watching Discovery is very much like riding through Disney's Haunted Mansion. They keep turning you this way and that so you see only what they want you to, hoping you don't look away to see the projectors and mirrors and strings.It is a part of the whole "weak story but we give you too many cool gimmicks".
Back to the spinning rings; I heard a character refer to it as the "excess energy cavitation" system. So it slings off the mushroom juju they don't need?
But then the whole ship turns into a damn fidget spinner, so is it really necessary to have the rings of the saucer spin?It is suppose to reflect the spore drive engaging so I can't see what the big deal is.
But then the whole ship turns into a damn fidget spinner, so is it really necessary to have the rings of the saucer spin?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.