I have feeling we'll get some groundwork in the upcoming series when they (try to) explain why the Doctor looks like Caecilus (and maybe Froebisher).
I know! He took on the face of an old favorite. It's a future Doctor. The intent of the scene was crystal clear. An older Doctor talking to his younger self.
I'm not sure why some feel the need to take something so simple, over analyze it, and twist it into something else.
Mr Awe
The dialogue is too ambigious to me and I really don't expect to see Tom Baker reprise his role of the Doctor in a future incarnation.
No reason for it. I don't see why regeneration boundaries should have significant importance over one's presence there. The Doctor just came from multiple points in his life. And perhaps ten was there four times.Funny, considering it should've been Tennant who should be there twice.![]()
No reason for it. I don't see why regeneration boundaries should have significant importance over one's presence there. The Doctor just came from multiple points in his life. And perhaps ten was there four times.Funny, considering it should've been Tennant who should be there twice.
The Curator is not a future incarnation of the Doctor.
He was just a guest appearance by Tom Baker to make up for his absence in the 20th anniversary special.
Hell, if anything I interpreted the scene as the Curator was the fourth Doctor. They all seem to continue "living" after the regenerate if the multi-Doctor stories are to be believed.
Where the heck do you get that (last paragraph) from? That is NOT at all what is depicted in Multi-Doctor stories.
I realize it's just a tie-in product, but the marketing copy for a forthcoming Doctor Who book crossed my desk earlier this week, and it referred to Baker's character in "The Day of the Doctor" as "the Fourth Doctor." Take that as you will.
I realize it's just a tie-in product, but the marketing copy for a forthcoming Doctor Who book crossed my desk earlier this week, and it referred to Baker's character in "The Day of the Doctor" as "the Fourth Doctor." Take that as you will.
So what exactly would this mean? That the Curator is in fact the Fourth Doctor temporarily aged like the Fifth in Time Crash?
Like the Woman in White or the "Morbius" Doctors, the Curator will be one of those one-off characters whose identity will be endlessly debated.
So, Colin for the NuWho 10th? Or for the overall 55th?Like the Woman in White or the "Morbius" Doctors, the Curator will be one of those one-off characters whose identity will be endlessly debated.
I really do think they should bring the Curator back in every milestone anniversary special, have him played by a former Doctor whose actor is too old to be believed as themselves a few decades ago. Christopher Eccleston as the Curator in the 75th would be awesome. I'm sure in 25 years he'd be open to a two minute cameo.
So, Colin for the NuWho 10th? Or for the overall 55th?Like the Woman in White or the "Morbius" Doctors, the Curator will be one of those one-off characters whose identity will be endlessly debated.
I really do think they should bring the Curator back in every milestone anniversary special, have him played by a former Doctor whose actor is too old to be believed as themselves a few decades ago. Christopher Eccleston as the Curator in the 75th would be awesome. I'm sure in 25 years he'd be open to a two minute cameo.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.