• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Why Jeffrey Hunter didn't continue with Star Trek

tim0122

Lieutenant Commander
Red Shirt
I really should've double-checked this earlier, but I'm working on a Star Trek video project. In the video, I say Jeffrey Hunter chose not to continue with the second pilot ("Where No Man Has Gone Before") because he wanted to focus more on his movie career and because his wife had convinced him that science fiction was beneath him. I found the first reason on Wikipedia (the crowning site for accurate information :P ), but I can't remember where I read the thing about his wife.

Are either of these reasons true/accurate?
 
It's worth noting that Shatner's account is, by necessity, second-hand since he was not yet involved with Trek at that point.
 
Shatner and Nimoy's accounts sound like an elaboration of what actually happened. Maybe Hunter didn't have the balls to turn down Roddenberry and the studio in person so he sent his wife as a cover. Or maybe she was simply controling his career at that point.

It does beg the question why Hunter did the first pilot at all if he was so averse to science fiction? And what happened post "The Cage" to cause his career to tank?
 
I loved his performance in the pilot but the rest of the cast including Nimoy were not very good. I'm wondering if Hunter did The Cage because he was finishing his NBC studio obligations? Is it possible his agent convinced him to move on from Trek?
 
I read Inside Star Trek: The Real Story, by Solow and Justman a couple of months ago, and the story about Hunter wife in in there.



=
 
I can't help but wonder if Hunter's injury in 1968, and ongoing dizzy spells leading to a fall, fatal injury and death in 1969 all wouldn't have happened if he had stayed on with Star Trek instead of going back to movies. :(

Kor
 
It does beg the question why Hunter did the first pilot at all if he was so averse to science fiction? And what happened post "The Cage" to cause his career to tank?

Maybe Roddenberry sold it to him the same way he sold it to NBC. As "Wagon Train to the Stars". When it didn't turn out to be that, Hunter lost interest.
 
That's a decent theory, BillJ. It's also possible he was trying to expand away from westerns.

I have no doubt it would have changed his life. And Shatner's.
 
Does any of you see Star Trek as a Space Western? Has anyone of you ever seen an episode of Wagon Train? I found it similar in tone with the Stranger in a strange land concept; going from place to place and helping people in need and moving on.
 
Last edited:
Does any of you see Star Trek as a Space Western? Has anyone of you ever seen an episode of Wagon Train? I found it similar in tone with the Stranger in a strange land concept; going from place to place and helping people is need and moving on.
Like Kung Fu? :lol:
 
Star Trek was like Wagon Train in visiting different places and having different guest stars every week, not in being a space western like Firefly would someday be.

Kor
 
In its general storytelling style, Trek had plenty in common with the many and varied Westerns that populated the TV landscape in that era. It doesn't particularly resemble Wagon Train from what I've seen of that show, however...WT was much more of a semi-anthology, with stronger focus on guest characters of the week and their stories than on the recurring cast.
 
I'm wondering if that was the premise Hunter was interested in as a semi-anthology with a stronger focus on guest characters of the week? Anyone ever read about James Garner and his TV series Maverick with the revolving cast?
All in all in order to do an anthology trek series in 1965, and later 66; the starship would not be branded with registry numbers but blank. The story will simply imply the ship as another name every week as it beauty passes near small planets. I'm not sure if an anthology series could work, all depends on the guest star who might appear, but it's an interesting take on the concept.
 
In its general storytelling style, Trek had plenty in common with the many and varied Westerns that populated the TV landscape in that era. It doesn't particularly resemble Wagon Train from what I've seen of that show, however...WT was much more of a semi-anthology, with stronger focus on guest characters of the week and their stories than on the recurring cast.

Indeed, very guest-star driven; almost all of the episode titles are in the format of "The [insert guest character name] Story." They sometimes had "name" guests, movie actors past the prime of their careers. The one I watched last night had Lou Costello as a well-meaning drunk who travels with an orphan girl and "stows away" in the wagon company. (The girl was played by Beverly Washburn who was a victim of "The Deadly Years.") The other day it was William Bendix, and a couple with Marjorie Main before that.

What was similar to ST was that the premise involved constant travel, so the core of regulars could be in completely different settings with different guests every week. Rawhide did this, too. Cheyenne, Have Gun Will Travel and Wanted Dead or Alive also traveled all over the West, but their stars were pretty much solo.

Anyone ever read about James Garner and his TV series Maverick with the revolving cast?

That wasn't a creative decision, it was mainly to do with inexperience making a weekly full-hour show; they got behind in production so they brought in Jack Kelly as a second lead who could be shooting another episode with a different crew at the same time as the one with Garner. The scripts could star Garner or Kelly interchangeably, they weren't written specifically for the characters except when Bret and Bart were both in the whole episode. This caused some real problems with sponsors who had bought the show with Garner as the star of every episode. To help alleviate some of the trouble this caused, Garner would shoot some short intros setting up Bart's adventure, or a short scene with Kelly for the very end, usually meeting up on a nondescript piece of trail.

The Name of the Game later used rotating leads, but it was 90 minutes and used extensive -- and expensive -- location shooting. The Bold Ones, too, though that was more like three different series under one umbrella title. It's an interesting idea, that a show like Star Trek would try something like that, perhaps to make time for effects work, but it was never considered that I've ever heard.
 
Does any of you see Star Trek as a Space Western? Has anyone of you ever seen an episode of Wagon Train? I found it similar in tone with the Stranger in a strange land concept; going from place to place and helping people in need and moving on.
Like Kung Fu? :lol:
"Doctor, it is logical to suggest that when you can walk the rice paper without tearing it, your footsteps will not be heard."
"Are you saying I make too much noise? Why, you green-blooded, pointy-eared hobgoblin ...."
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top