Best examples of an Anthology series were Twilight Zone, Maverick, The Outer Limits, Tales from the Darkside, Wagon Train.
Wagon Train and Maverick weren't anthologies, they had a regular cast.
Best examples of an Anthology series were Twilight Zone, Maverick, The Outer Limits, Tales from the Darkside, Wagon Train.
Do you realize that David Carradine did say that he used Leonard Nimoy's portrayal of 'Mr. Spock' as a template for his portrayal of the "Kwai Chang Caine" character in scenes where he was 'at peace' or trying to stay as non-violent/stoic as possible when he was being taunted, or assaulted by others? (no lie.)Like Kung Fu?![]()
From what I've seen of those shows, I'd say that it resembled Rawhide the most. I guess "Rawhide to the stars" didn't have the ring that Gene was looking for....What was similar to ST was that the premise involved constant travel, so the core of regulars could be in completely different settings with different guests every week. Rawhide did this, too. Cheyenne, Have Gun Will Travel and Wanted Dead or Alive also traveled all over the West, but their stars were pretty much solo.
Best examples of an Anthology series were Twilight Zone, Maverick, The Outer Limits, Tales from the Darkside, Wagon Train.
Indeed, there's a distinction between pure anthologies (standalone stories with no recurring cast) like Twilight Zone and The Outer Limits, and semi-anthologies, which had recurring casts but tended to focus much more strongly on the stories of the episodic guest characters, with the regulars often seeming more like supporting characters than leads. In addition to Wagon Train, Naked City and Route 66 are good examples of semi-anthologies. There's definitely a blurry line where semi-anthologies end, though...lots of shows of the era often focused strongly on the stories of guest characters without quite coming off as semi-anthology series...e.g., Bonanza.Wagon Train and Maverick weren't anthologies, they had a regular cast.
Or maybe Hunter was up for another part when Gene rang him up about a second go as Pike. That'd be as logical a reason as any.
I can't help but wonder if Hunter's injury in 1968, and ongoing dizzy spells leading to a fall, fatal injury and death in 1969 all wouldn't have happened if he had stayed on with Star Trek instead of going back to movies.
Kor
Certainly a possibility, although there's not much activity linked to his name in the trades in 1965.
Really, the only time Hunter spoke on the record about his decision not to take the second pilot was a July 4, 1965 interview Hunter gave to The Milwaukee Journal, in which he said, "Had I accepted [Star Trek], I would have been tied up much longer than I care to be. I love doing motion pictures and expect to be as busy as I want to be in them." The thing about these comments is that Hunter wasn't as active in motion pictures as he claimed, and a few months later had no problem committing to a series pilot (and a potential series if it sold).
1. Hunter made one film in January of 1965 (Brainstorm, a cheapie that fulfilled a contract he had with Warner Bros., and was released less than four months after the start of production) and one film in late November and December of 1965 (Strange Portrait; another cheapie, for which he was not the original choice to play the lead). In between he filmed a pair of one-shot guest roles, and...
2. On October 18, 1965, he signed a contract to play the lead in a proposed pilot (produced by William Dozier) called Journey Into Fear (for NBC, incidentally).
He may have wanted to be a movie star, but that didn't happen.
Also, Hunter did an interview in which he seemed to like playing Pike on Star Trek, and explained why he did, talking about the science and the exploration that would go on the show.
2. On October 18, 1965, he signed a contract to play the lead in a proposed pilot (produced by William Dozier) called Journey Into Fear (for NBC, incidentally).
He may have wanted to be a movie star, but that didn't happen.
Certainly a possibility, although there's not much activity linked to his name in the trades in 1965.
Really, the only time Hunter spoke on the record about his decision not to take the second pilot was a July 4, 1965 interview Hunter gave to The Milwaukee Journal, in which he said, "Had I accepted [Star Trek], I would have been tied up much longer than I care to be. I love doing motion pictures and expect to be as busy as I want to be in them." The thing about these comments is that Hunter wasn't as active in motion pictures as he claimed, and a few months later had no problem committing to a series pilot (and a potential series if it sold).
1. Hunter made one film in January of 1965 (Brainstorm, a cheapie that fulflled a contract he had with Warner Bros., and was released less than four months after the start of production) and one film in late November and December of 1965 (Strange Portrait; another cheapie, for which he was not the original choice to play the lead). In between he filmed a pair of one-shot guest roles, and...
2. On October 18, 1965, he signed a contract to play the lead in a proposed pilot (produced by William Dozier) called Journey Into Fear (for NBC, incidentally).
He may have wanted to be a movie star, but that didn't happen.
^^^Replying to Shaka Zulu: Is that the interview where he says the show takes place in the year 2000?
Which rather shows they didn't need him for that. Although I don't recall if they actually tried to get him back or not.Shame they couldn't have gotten him back for The Menagerie though where he could have played the disfigured Pike! For years as a kid I really thought it was him too!
JB
Back in the 70s, I wrote to the "Star Trek Welcommittee" (anyone remember them?), asking if that was Jeffery Hunter. They wrote back saying it was a "very well made-up Jeffrey Hunter." Obviously, the "Making-of" books weren't out yet. I wonder where they got their bad info.Shame they couldn't have gotten him back for The Menagerie though where he could have played the disfigured Pike! For years as a kid I really thought it was him too!
JB
For the record, I thought it was him also....and, for the record, I also think they did fine without him.Which rather shows they didn't need him for that. Although I don't recall if they actually tried to get him back or not.
Back in the 70s, I wrote to the "Star Trek Welcommittee" (anyone remember them?), asking if that was Jeffery Hunter. They wrote back saying it was a "very well made-up Jeffrey Hunter." Obviously, the "Making-of" books weren't out yet. I wonder where they got their bad info.
If they'd actually been able to get Hunter to return as Pike, "The Menagerie" would've been a very different episode that likely wouldn't have had an injured Pike. You don't book an actor of Hunter's stature to be an immobile character with no spoken dialogue. The whole reason for Pike's injury was to disguise Sean Kenney and make him look as much like Hunter as possible.Shame they couldn't have gotten him back for The Menagerie though where he could have played the disfigured Pike! For years as a kid I really thought it was him too!![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.