• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

The USS Yeager: Deep Space Nine's "Other" Assigned Starship?

Mark_Nguyen

Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Let's talk about the USS Yeager!

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

I was recently in Japan, where I found the Eaglemoss model of the "Frankenstein Fleet" USS Yeager on a peg in the back of a used stuff store (ye gods, I love bargain hunting in this country). I bought the model, though it didn't come with the book or box, and started delving into this oft-chastised offspring of two store-bought ship models used as a background ship on DS9. Strangely, I quite like the silhouette this ship cuts when flying it around my office, in spite of the insanity of meshing two models together with some pretty different scales.

I was surprised to learn that despite its thrown-together origins, it was seen quite frequently outside DS9, appearing in over twenty episodes as recycled footage of a couple station shots. This makes it one of the most commonly-seen allied ships in the show after the station itself, the Defiant and assorted runabouts. Some have even ventured to say that it was permanently assigned to the station as a picket ship or monitor, adding extra oomph to the defences should DS9 ever come under attack again - which it wasn't, so maybe the assignment worked.

[ A "picket ship" is historically a smaller boat used for patrol around harbors or naval bases, used to signal the alarm in case of attack and then to offer support or rescue services for the big ships in a conflict. Alternatively, a "radar picket " describes a ship or plane that mounts sensors to extend detection range around a fleet or instalation. A monitor meanwhile was used as a small ship carrying bigger guns than would normally mounted on a craft her size, used for mobile picket defence or for shore bombardment. Interestingly, 20th century monitors had a tendency to be cobbled together ships using turrets from larger warships, which is in part an apt description for the Yeager. ]

I'm inclined to accept this sort of reasoning, really - the Yeager was never seen in any fleet shots, though apparently the name and number showed her as part of the fleet that took the station back from the Dominion in Operation Return. She was first seen three times late in the fifth season, but was absent when the station was lost to the Dominion in the first place - possibly off on maneuvers that resulted in the destruction of some shipyards as noted in "A Call To Arms". But since then, she was seen in almost half of the remaining episodes of the show! Arguably, those particular clips were seen more often than other stock footage of the station with the Defiant docked or orbiting, meaning that the Yeager was seen more often than the DS9's "known" assigned ships.

She was notably absent in the final, ten-episode arc of the series, though she did appear in a Borg-related comic set a few years after. Really quite an interesting service record, assuming it wasn't multiple ships of the same class (which is just as acceptable as any other theory, given the repurposing of footage for multiple named ships over the course of the franchise).

Mark
 
I've had in my head canon for a while that this ship was indeed assigned to the station like the Defiant, and maybe even shared the same docking port as the Defiant when the Defiant was away.
 
Last edited:
So basically another escort type, but one that is significantly less of a warship design than Defiant.
 
Then you would hear O'Brian complaining about it or someone repeatedly complaining about the requisitions all the time
 
In some of the storyboards for the new opening credits for season 4, where the Nebula class USS Leeds is docked on an upper pylon, Dan Curry’s art actually shows a ship that looks not unlike the Yeager. But this is probably just coincidental:

https://warpfactortrek.com/designing-ds9s-main-titles/

However, we don’t actually see the model until the season 5 episode “Dr. Bashir, I Presume” (guest starring Robert Picardo as Dr. Lewis Zimmerman in the first DS9/Voyager crossover.) Because of this, I always felt that Gary Hutzel built the ship as an in-joke.
 
Last edited:
i tend to assume that this was not a "frankenstein" job (though to be honest, i tend not to think that any of the so called 'frankenstein fleet' was actually made from scrap for the war, just doesn't make sense. especially given the wildly weird scaling issues for the parts*)
i tend to assume that the ship was a technology test bed, perhaps testing some variation of the adaptable warp field system that the Intrepids used with their moving nacelle pylons. that they used the Intrepid base hull (thus the saucer) and modified the design from there to fit various experimental systems they were testing aboard. resulting in the resemblance to the marquis raider for the lower hull. (which had to be coincidental or the result of a designer liking the look, as the actual maquis raider was tiny, not much bigger than an Intrepid's or yeager's nacelles.)

presumably the result would have been a very fast starship, since that enlarged lower hull would have been able to fit a bigger warpcore, and presumably those moving nacelles would let it violate the warp 5 speed limit safely. which honestly would help explain why it was stationed at DS9. Bajor was a fairly central strategic spot where a fast ship could respond to emergencies from with little delay.

*i tend to assume that the so called "frankenstein fleet" were in fact normal starfleet vessels. just classes that were never built in large numbers. since many of them used parts from miranda's, connies, and excelsiors, i tend to assume that most date from the late 23rd, early 24th century period. and that starfleet dragged them out of mothballs for the war, since if it has shields and phasers, it can fight. even if it was originally designed for non-combat focused uses. this resolves the parts scaling issues, as well as avoids the inanity of thinking that you can plug unrelated ship parts together like lego's. sure, starfleet stuff seems to be fairly modular, but to get the various parts to fit together, with many of them connected in places no standard class uses? would have required basically a total rebuild. with even more resources and effort spent than just building a standard class ship.
 
I at first recoiled at the idea of the same planform used at different scales—but then I remembered the Glomar Challenger and the Glomar Explorer. One was to have a claw pick up a sunken sub—-at a distance, the larger ship looked little different than the smaller.

When rockets are launched, they all look about the same size due to squaring them up to fit the screen. Ariane 4 with strap-ons looks huge—Zenit being shaped like a pencil—looks smaller.
 
Yup. RIght now the company Scaled Composites has the Stratolaunch, which is visually just a big version of its earlier plane White Knight Two, save for a couple extra engines. They both have the same mission, with Stratolaunch made to carry bigger payloads to launch altitudes.

Also, for the most part naval ships of a given type (warship, submarine, cargo megaship) are just different sizes of the same hull below the waterline - people quickly figured out what the ideal shape was based the hydrometrics they were pushing through, and scaling up or down kept those same general efficiencies. Something similar could be at play here, replacing water with subspace or something.

Mark
 
I think less "Assigned to DS9" and more "Assigned to Bajor Sector", of which DS9 is the central hub.

Yeager almost certainly isn't under command of DS9 directly, like the Defiant. Rather, it receives orders like any ship, frequently stopping at DS9 for starbase support.

I would say it's likely Yeager is an experimental vessel of sorts. I like the idea of it being something of a testbed for the Intrepid-Class technologies... not quite an Intrepid, uses some of its parts, but was meant more to be a prototype.

The ship ended up being... a fine enough ship on its own that Starfleet kept in service, especially Post-Wolf 359.
 
maybe even shared the same docking port as the Defiant when the Defiant was away.
With an Intrepid saucer, it'd be too large to fit in that docking port, surely? After all, when Voyager was docked at the station, it was docked at one of the pylons, so logically so too would the Yeager if it ever docked.
 
With an Intrepid saucer, it'd be too large to fit in that docking port, surely? After all, when Voyager was docked at the station, it was docked at one of the pylons, so logically so too would the Yeager if it ever docked.
You're right. The Intrepid saucer is too big. I was thinking about docking through the Maquis Raider's fore section, but the raider part has been up-scaled, so it might not fit either. Docking pylons it is then.
 
With an Intrepid saucer, it'd be too large to fit in that docking port, surely? After all, when Voyager was docked at the station, it was docked at one of the pylons, so logically so too would the Yeager if it ever docked.
The Intrepid is pretty pointy, and has an airlock at the forward tip. With DS9's inconsistent scaling, it would probably fit between the "claws" around each of the docking ring berths.
 
The Intrepid is pretty pointy, and has an airlock at the forward tip. With DS9's inconsistent scaling, it would probably fit between the "claws" around each of the docking ring berths.
Maybe if the Intrepid saucer was triangular like the Prometheus or Dauntless, but the saucer is more oval. There is that airlock on the front edge of the saucer. I wonder if Intrepid classes were supposed to be able to dock inside the hangers of those Regula I type starbases (which were also inconsistent with their scaling).
 
Maybe if the Intrepid saucer was triangular like the Prometheus or Dauntless, but the saucer is more oval. There is that airlock on the front edge of the saucer. I wonder if Intrepid classes were supposed to be able to dock inside the hangers of those Regula I type starbases (which were also inconsistent with their scaling).
Yeah, I just checked with a couple of CG models I have. The claws around the docking ring come out a lot further than I remembered. If they can hinge or slide open (and that makes sense, it’s hard to imagine what they're for if not grabbing on to docking ships) then it could work, easily, but if they're fixed in place, an Intrepid/Yeager wouldn't fit even with the giant DS9 from shots where a Galaxy or Nebula was docked.
 
Last edited:
"In the Cards" showed the Yeager docked on the Habitat Ring:

VWfts9E.jpg


In trying to square away the size of the secondary hull (lots of storage or manufacturing space there) and the large dual launchers at its rear I wondered if this was in fact a minelayer. Mining the entrance to the Wormhole must've always been in mind as a tactical possibility for Starfleet throughout the war... it just so happened that the Yeager was out-of-system when the job actually needed to be done. ;)

Outside of wartime, the Yeager's same facillities could be used to deploy swarms of probes or constellations of satellites in second-contact or colonising scenarios.
 
"In the Cards" showed the Yeager docked on the Habitat Ring:

VWfts9E.jpg


In trying to square away the size of the secondary hull (lots of storage or manufacturing space there) and the large dual launchers at its rear I wondered if this was in fact a minelayer. Mining the entrance to the Wormhole must've always been in mind as a tactical possibility for Starfleet throughout the war... it just so happened that the Yeager was out-of-system when the job actually needed to be done. ;)

Outside of wartime, the Yeager's same facillities could be used to deploy swarms of probes or constellations of satellites in second-contact or colonising scenarios.

Was it docked or was it just flying by behind the station?
 
You're right, it's not docked. On closer inspection the angle of ship is not quite aligned with the radial of the station as you'd expect if it was docked. But it is just close enough to have fooled me. :whistle:
 
You're right. The Intrepid saucer is too big. I was thinking about docking through the Maquis Raider's fore section, but the raider part has been up-scaled, so it might not fit either. Docking pylons it is then.

Is it too big though? The "nose" tapers down quite a bit, I think the tip could fit in there. Granted there is no apparent hatch or anything that for forward on an Intrepid. There's also no particular reason the ship has to actually be actually crammed in there... they have things like gangways and such that could be extended.

BUT... that being said... yeah I think it's much more likely to be docked at a pylon. I think those smaller docks are for smaller vessels.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top