he/she is the one who took their proverbial football and left the playground to seemingly pout. if he/she wants to come back, by all means come.So, you're now taking my titles away from me?
This may mean war.
he/she is the one who took their proverbial football and left the playground to seemingly pout. if he/she wants to come back, by all means come.So, you're now taking my titles away from me?
This may mean war.
We didn't.Wait, why would we chase out the one fellow who was making for reasonable debate?
I guess what I want to say; Janeway needed to be a better character than she was because it was important to Star Trek, and television in general - and anything less than that is doing a disservice to women, men and most of all, Trekkers (the good ones anyway).
I am fine with Janeway taking on a sort of maternal/mentor role, but for some reason that goes out then window when dealing with lower ranking officers?
you said "astropolitical environment" in this thread. this indeed sounds like a politician.I try.
Apparently, in a discussion in the TNG forum, someone referred to me as "Admiral Janeway" and said I was making things up as I go: Link
I take that as a compliment. Oh, and that I'm a she.![]()
So, there are only 16 female characters in Star Trek? Huh? What does she mean by 25%?Four female characters a full 25% of Trek’s Female characters dead and not one of them has made a comeback, not a single one.
Conclusion - Even in Trek there are fewer Females, they suffer death at a disproportionally higher rate and unlike males they are never brought back.
you said "astropolitical environment" in this thread. this indeed sounds like a politician.I try.
Apparently, in a discussion in the TNG forum, someone referred to me as "Admiral Janeway" and said I was making things up as I go: Link
I take that as a compliment. Oh, and that I'm a she.![]()
![]()
Anyways, I don't understand this line:
So, there are only 16 female characters in Star Trek? Huh? What does she mean by 25%?Four female characters a full 25% of Trek’s Female characters dead and not one of them has made a comeback, not a single one.
Conclusion - Even in Trek there are fewer Females, they suffer death at a disproportionally higher rate and unlike males they are never brought back.
Uhura was never really a main cast member in the show, neither officially nor factually, if you look at the screentime and storylines - Kirk, Spock and McCoy were the only main cast members - though you may argue that she become one in the movies, together with Scotty, Sulu and Chekov.I'm only counting 13 main title females, actually: Uhura, Crusher, Troi, Yar, Dax x2, Kira, Seven, Janeway, Kes, Torres, T'Pol, and Hoshi. Are the other three Rand, Chapel, and maybe Leeta or Lwaxana? M'Ress? If we go into prominent guest stars, the numbers become fuzzier.
Anyways, I don't understand this line:
So, there are only 16 female characters in Star Trek? Huh? What does she mean by 25%?Four female characters a full 25% of Trek’s Female characters dead and not one of them has made a comeback, not a single one.
Conclusion - Even in Trek there are fewer Females, they suffer death at a disproportionally higher rate and unlike males they are never brought back.
This is very simple math. From Uhura to T'Pol there have been 16 female cast members in the five Trek series, four of these females have died. If sixteen is the whole, then four is one quarter of that whole or 25%. Since 4+4+4+4=16, then 4=25%.
I'm pretty sure this is right, I am an accountant and have been working with numbers for 36 years now.
Brit
Uhura was never really a main cast member in the show, neither officially nor factually, if you look at the screentime and storylines - Kirk, Spock and McCoy were the only main cast members - though you may argue that she become one in the movies, together with Scotty, Sulu and Chekov.I'm only counting 13 main title females, actually: Uhura, Crusher, Troi, Yar, Dax x2, Kira, Seven, Janeway, Kes, Torres, T'Pol, and Hoshi. Are the other three Rand, Chapel, and maybe Leeta or Lwaxana? M'Ress? If we go into prominent guest stars, the numbers become fuzzier.
Guinan, on the other hand, though she was always created as a guest star, was in the show for several seasons, and one could say she was practically a regular, or semi-regular. I can't remember how Diana Muldaur was credited, but Pulaski could be regarded as a regular during season 2.
Anyways, I don't understand this line:
So, there are only 16 female characters in Star Trek? Huh? What does she mean by 25%?
This is very simple math. From Uhura to T'Pol there have been 16 female cast members in the five Trek series, four of these females have died. If sixteen is the whole, then four is one quarter of that whole or 25%. Since 4+4+4+4=16, then 4=25%.
I'm pretty sure this is right, I am an accountant and have been working with numbers for 36 years now.
Brit
<sarcasm>Thanks for the math lesson.</sarcasm>I understood the math, I didn't believe the numbers used. And she didn't say 'main characters' she said 'female characters'. Bad counting.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.