Whatever salient points the OP was trying to make got overridden by the false assertion of Kess exemplifying everything that was 'bad' about Voyager.
Also, speaking from the experience of once having watched most of the first four seasons of Voyager in their intended order, I can say with the utmost confidence that it wasn't the writing that 'failed' Kes, but the decisions made by UPN executives who concluded that Voyager was the kind of Star Trek series that didn't need to be broadcast in a specific order when the truth is the exact opposite (it did need to be broadcast in a specific order because there was in fact continuity and progression to the stories despite the plots of individual episodes being resolved over the course of a single hour except in cases where the writers were telling a story that was specifically designed to be spread out over multiple episodes).
That was a devastating decision by the UPN hotshots.
Due to what the show was meant to be, which was a show about a ship traveling from one point in the galaxy to another, Voyager just had to have the episodes in a certain order. That the hotshots of UPN didn't realize that or simply didn't give a d**n is actually scary.
But it also explains the arrogance to the fans which was a trademark for the show during its existance. Those in charge, from the UPN hotshots to Berman and his gang of writers and producers didn't care. They were only in for the money, nothing more and when fans complained, they didn't care or did the opposite just to show the ungrateful sheep out there that "WE are in charge and WE decide".
Even the actors were affected by that arrogance and lack of interest for the show. Lien was dumped for no reason at all after three years of good work. Beltran tried to come up with suggestions but were told "NO" by those in charge. No matter that he got frustrated in the long run.
No doubt that the show suffered from continuity errors to downright stupidity when it was run on all levels by people who didn't care.
Voyager was actually a good show, at least in the three first seasons. But it could have been much better.
I've made my peace with Voyager being episodic. It may have fallen shy of its potential, but it provided a sort of show that many people wanted. A sort of "comfort Trek". DS9 was better overall, but both had their niche and their fans.
That doesn't mean I'm Ok with how sloppy it was, or the inconsistencies that could have been addressed with seconds of dialogue. There's no excuse for that.
I totally agree with you in what you have written.
I have often told the story about my problems with being able to watch DS9 due to problems with airing and such. Instead I happened to find Voyager back in 1998 and took an immediate liking to the series from the beginning, a liking which lasted until season 4.
However, I still like seasons 1,2 and 3. It's only in the recent years with most of my earlier emotions, good and bad being leveled out and because of being able to watch the whole of DS9 from start to end a couple of times that I've started to see the flaws in Voyager more clearly.
I still like the Voyager characters, most of them are still my favorites in many ways. But in the light of later experiences they seem a bit "flat" compared to the many facets of the DS9 characters and the development of those characters.
I wonder what would have happened if I had got the chance to watch the three first seasons of DS9
before starting watching Voyager. had I become the Voyager fan I did become after watching
Caretaker or would I have seen the flaws already then.
I know that there was a lot fon criticizm to Voyager from many DS9 fans back then. I didn't understand why then but I understand some of it now.