This is an unfortunate trend in modern times. Demanding tolerance when showing none for people with diffrent ideas to you.
You're correct. An unfortunate and downright stupid trend in the Dark Ages of the 2020's.
Clearly, you're not. Ick.
The Kes-Neelix relationship don't bother me at all.
At least not when it comes to numbers. What did bother me was that they grew apart quickly after joining the Voyager crew. Kes found new friends, became a nurse and developed while Neelix had problems to fit in. That was the reason why he came up with his whims about "Morale Officer", journalism and all that in order to feel important.
His jealousy when it came to Kes was probably the main reason why they drifted apart. That's why the relationship should have been broken up already in season 2 and been more carefully explained during 2-3 episodes instead of what happened in Warlord.
Kirk's actions were more.......well controversial but don't bother me that much either due to what we see everyday when it comes to celebrities of all sorts using their influence to pick up younger mates.
Dummy.
Lonely Neelix rebuilds his lost girlfriend on the holodeck. Eventually he realises that he is sad and creepy after a conversation with the Doctor, so he asks Captain Janeway on a real date, in the real world.
She rejects him, and they both go home to cry themselves to sleep.
The Doctor and Holo Kes live happily ever after.
Honestly, I don't think that we need a "holo-Kes".
You might want to go back and reread the thread, and your part in it. I answered the original post honestly. You couldn’t let it slide that you didn’t like my response. You had to come back with pages on pages on why I and others were wrong.
Physician, heal thyself…
That's a good idea!
So we have an original post in which the poster wants a discussion about "Kes returns-what episode would you have made?
And you jump in and ditch the character immediately with a rather off-topic comment instead of ignoring a thread which obviously was of no interest for you.
And I reply:
Definitely not.
She's a great character who really represent the spirit of Star Trek.
To learn and explore.
Which is exactly what I think. I see no reason to change that and my comment wasn't insulting or agressive in any way.
After that arrives two posters whose comments I do find annoying and insulting but that's another story.
Of course I come back with comments about how I think you are wrong when you and your dear buddies continue to attack the character and my opinions about the character over and over again.
That's called a
discussion!
And as long we can keep it rather cordial, I see no problem with it.
And why should I back down?
That would be an action of cowardice, wouldn't it?
As for the last comment in your previous post, I don't know exactly what that meant. But you may be out on thin ice there.
If you actually read my posts instead of throwing temper tantrums, you would see that I never once said that you couldn't think whatever the hell you wanted about Kes and 'Fury.' You can think she was actually the Salt Vampire for all I care. And you can hate the episode all you want and hate what they did with the character. What I said was that the intent of the producers and writers of that episode was that she was Kes, and she wasn't being influenced by any external factors, and all official publications and websites owned by CBS/Paramount have confirmed this. So hate it all you want, but that's the way it happened. I happen to hate what they did with Trip Tucker in ENT, but I'm not going to pretend that it didn't happen, as much as I would like to. But I'm not so emotionally invested in a fictional character that way.
Yes, I can think what I want about it and that's what I'm doing.
Not to mention that the difference between you and me is when I see that something is broken, I want to fix it.