HortaVorta said:
Christopher, I greatly enjoy your meticulous, thoughtful approach to weaving all these disparate details that have piled up in Trek over the years into a plausible and compelling whole. I'm a big fan of that approach, and I think you've got the perfect blend of logic and restraint that keeps it from getting fannish.
Moreover, the awful grandeur of space and time you evoke in these books is enthralling. I've always been intrigued by the brief glimpses we get in Trek of the galaxy's dense, layered histories of development and extinction. Your extrapolations are consistent, fascinating, and evocative.
You've got a great grasp of the characters too. As Picard came in contact with his future crew, it was a nice callback to the late '80s and my early enjoyment of TNG.
Bravo. I look forward to future contributions.
Thank you very much! I enjoy exploring the larger tapestry that ties Trek together, and I'm glad you enjoy the results.
Admiral_Young said:
Another thing that I enjoy about your work is the technical and scientific detail you make a point to include in the story as it is a rather important thing in a ST novel or episode (technobabble) but also your inclusion of real scienice or at least theorical science and cutting edge science being included within the mix of Star Trek universe science makes it all the more entertaining and allows the reader to actualy do research if they so wish without bashing them over the head with it!!!
In my youth, I learned a lot about science from the science fiction I read (indeed, it was
Star Trek that initially inspired my interest in space and science). I've always felt that SF can be a great, entertaining way to teach about real science, and so I always try to work real scientific concepts (or historical ones) into my fiction. But, as you say, to do it unobtrusively so it doesn't feel like one of those dramatized educational things they show on PBS or issue to classrooms on video.
Have I sucked up to you enough now?
I'll let you know...
...and the artist intereptation of Ariel/Giriaenn was much apprieated as I was having a hard time visuallizing her...
I wasn't sure I conveyed her description well enough in the text either. I was actually surprised at how well the picture turned out. I was planning on doing a sketch in pencil (regular and colored), but this turned out better than that could have.
Baerbel Haddrell said:
The excellent cover of “The Buried Age” also shows a Picard who obviously just made a stunning discovery. This combined with the author`s style of combining a strong sense of discovery and wonder, of SF-science with strong character elements in his Titan book “Orion`s Hounds”, caused me to expect a story in a similar style that would be something special to me.
I quickly found out that I was right: “The Buried Age” is indeed one of the best Picard stories I have read so far and the style of the book reminded me indeed of the Star Trek: Titan novel I mentioned. The descriptions of the aliens, their history and their culture were very interesting.
Thank you! I appreciate it.
Hardcore SF is not my cup of tea but the scientific and technological parts of the book didn`t bother me most of the time, which is already something positive. Sometimes they even captured my attention and I made some more effort to follow these explanations. Nevertheless, I think this is the only weakness at times in this book. The explanations about the transporter problems, like when Janeway was spewing her technobabble, just went past me. I neither had the motivation nor the technical understanding to follow that. I remember that I lost patience at one point and skimmed a few paragraphs.
Sorry that didn't work for you. It's kind of symptomatic of the way I plot these things -- I can't just make up random technobabble, I need to have some understanding of how it could actually work. And then I needed to have the characters explain that logical process I went through to get from point A to point B. I tried to simplify it as much as I could, but it got into some pretty complex areas, and even I felt the techie analysis got a little cluttered at times. I hope the saving grace is that most of it actually makes a fair degree of physical sense.
I also think the idea of using a black hole as a giant computer for storing data does not make sense. It was too fantastic and just sounded ridiculous to me.

Okay. Actually this part is pretty firmly rooted in physics, specifically the
black hole information paradox arising from the work of Hawking and Bekenstein. At most I made a few minor tweaks to serve the story.
But this barely counts compared with how much I enjoyed the book. I definitely felt for a long time that I am going on a discovery as well when Picard started his expedition. This feeling already started with the powerful speech he gave in class. He certainly got my attention and I smiled because his passion was so tangible and infectious.
Glad you liked his lecture. I feared it was a little dry and talky.
I like it how the author tries to also give humanoid species he invented something special, something that makes them distinctive among the many humanoid species in the Star Trek universe. The symbiosis between plant life and the Mabrae is very interesting indeed.
Yeah, I haven't really done much with humanoids before, have I? Aside from established ones like the Fabrini.
I must admit, the many descriptions of how beautiful, wondrous and otherwise perfect “Ariel” was got at times a bit on my nerves. But I was also amused because I thought, this is a male author. Why should he not write about such a kind of super woman?
I'll confess that's part of it. But also, I was trying to depict a highly advanced species in a way that differed from the usual Trek cliches of telekinesis and glowy energy beings and stuff like that. So she was advanced in other ways, physically and mentally, and I guess describing those advancements could come off as doting on her perfection.
First of all, I love the parallels with Babylon 5 (although I am aware of it that there must be other SF stories out there dealing with the same idea). In Babylon 5 there was a clear division between the ancient and the new races as well as the desire of some ancient races to guide the younger ones. In Babylon 5 it was the Vorlons and the Shadows, very roughly a competition between “order” and “conflict”.
I think we saw something very similar, although not that obvious, in this book. Also the Federation is guiding younger races but following an opposite philosophy compared with “Ariel`s”, meaning Giriaenn`s species, the Manraloth.
I don't think I really thought about it in B5 terms. Maybe at the back of my mind I was aware of the similarity, but it wasn't a specific inspiration.
The book shows very well that extremes, that absolutes are usually not the right answer. I very much agree with what the author said about the Prime Directive and in the past I often pointed out how much I disagree with the literal meaning of this law. The Manraloth on the other hand don`t favour growth by conflict but growth by order. As with the PD, it looks good on the surface but this extreme, absolute form is not an approach I agree with either. That Picard was determined to fight her and the Manraloth was very understandable and I very much agreed with him.
In fact, what I had in mind was that the society the Manraloth had built really did work as well as they said, because it had evolved organically with the willing participation of its members, and because it had this whole rich support structure to keep it functioning smoothly. Maybe it was more tame and restrained and whitebread than modern civilizations, but that was the tradeoff for a successfully peaceful and egalitarian society. Giriaenn's mistake was in trying to recreate it unilaterally and push it on people who hadn't asked for it or participated in creating it.
By analogy, Great Britain in the 19th-20th centuries had built a pretty free, enlightened, civilized society, and that was good for its own people, but then when they went around and tried to impose that social order on other people who already had their own, it wasn't such a good thing. What was positive and liberating among the people who'd created and opted into it by choice was negative and oppressive among the peoples who had it pushed on them by others who thought they knew better.
The climax was excellent. I was actually waiting for it that Picard plays Sheridan`s part. It was not “Get the hell out of this galaxy!” But in essence there is not a big difference, except that Picard was less blunt and more diplomatic.... Picard made it clear that the Federation, knowing about the history of the Manraloth and their efforts to manipulate them, reacted very much the same: Picard explained that humanity and species on a similar level will find their own way and that the Manraloth (like the Vorlons and Shadows) should finally move to the next level.
To be honest, I find the whole "It's time to move on to the next level" thing to be rather corny. But it was mandated by the need to reset the playing field to the state it was in during TNG. And it's an established principle of the Trek universe, so I tried to make the best of it.
I very much enjoyed the part when the Manraloth met Q. It was also fun because it provided a direct link to “Encounter at Farpoint”. It explains a lot and it also makes me even more curious about “Q &A”, the new book featuring Q which is announced for October.
Just to be clear, there's no direct connection between
Q&A and my Interlude. Keith and I made sure to stay consistent with each other, and I stuck in a throwaway line foreshadowing
Q&A, but that's about it.
This is a remarkable book and I think people who like Picard should definitely read it.
Thank you!