All shows drop significantly over time on there, especially divisive ones. There's also a lot of trolling on IMDB. It will happen.
Except it’s gone up a point. We’ll see if it’ll go up or down from this point on.
All shows drop significantly over time on there, especially divisive ones. There's also a lot of trolling on IMDB. It will happen.
but is DSC divisive? A handful of MAGA-hats are outraged because 'girls have cooties', but other than those weirdos the backlash and critique is more or less at the same level than it was with every iteration of BermanTrekAll shows drop significantly over time on there, especially divisive ones. There's also a lot of trolling on IMDB. It will happen.
I think the Haters on IMDB are just more vocal, not more numerous. Otherwise, they would've impacted DSC's rating a lot more.
You have no evidence of that. It's conspiracy theory nonsense.
It certainly was an interesting time around here back then.I've been here since 1999. The VOY Forum was horrible. I didn't post in the forum because I stopped watching by that point, but I was aware of the horror stories and saw some of it. Because of what happened in the VOY Forum, the ENT mods would later only give posters in the ENT Forum in an inch of rope. Sometimes a lot less. And it was still out of control! Flame Wars galore. Cancel ENT Petitions. Decanonize ENT Petitions. Insane, over-the-top Canonistas. It was nuts. Even though I didn't like the show, I wanted to put as much distance between myself and those whackos as I could. I did not want to be associated with those people. Mod turnover in the forum was high because they'd get burned out so fast. And I think some of the posters went out of their way to try to wear those mods down. The three forums you had to avoid at the time, if you didn't have the stomach for it were: ENT, TNZ, and MA.
By comparison, the shit I hear about DSC in here gets annoying sometimes. But that's all. Occasionally, we have someone who's needlessly combative here or is trying to aggravate things there... but overall this is nothing.
But if DSC was a great show, it wouldn't have such a problem with haters.
People hate it because it's the new thing, the same thing happened with all the previous series.But if DSC was a great show, it wouldn't have such a problem with haters.
but if it were a great show the fanbase would dwarf those initial group of people with the preconceptions about the show.I disagree. Some people already decided what they thought about the show as soon as it was announced.
People hate it because it's the new thing, the same thing happened with all the previous series.
Nope - ESPECIALLY in Star Trek fan circles. NO new/post TOS outing has been loved or lauded by fans out of the gate. NONE. Including STII:TWoK because of "They're KILLING Spock!" <--- which was leaked long before the film hit theaters. That pissed numerous people off no matter what other said).But if DSC was a great show, it wouldn't have such a problem with haters.
but if it were a great show the fanbase would dwarf those initial group of people with the preconceptions about the show.
Nope. A lot of haters are mindless drones, they listen to what the popular people tell them, not what they actually think.
There's nothing gendered about the term "treasonous meltdown" in and of itself, but I'd have to see the context to know if that is purely what the person making the remark was objecting to or if there was more to it.This rather depends on what you find to be "buzzwords". Reviewer John Price was recently accused of sexism for his use of the term "treasonous meltdown" in regards to Burnham in the pilot… the terminology was declared "gendered" by the accuser.
By any rational standard that accusation was absurd, yet there it was.
And what, precisely, is that modern variety of acceptable bigotry that you're dancing around but not willing to say? Using other examples I've encountered, it's always funny how the people making that claim always stop just short of outright saying "straight white men" because they know how ridiculous it sounds to suggest that straight white men are victims of widespread bigotry. Is that what you were suggesting there, or something else? Because that's who usually gets criticized in response to the loud and angry fans who object to having greater representation of women and LGBTQ people and people of color in leading roles that used to be traditionally mainly the domain of straight white males, some of whom consider more egalitarian casting decisions an existential threat for some reason.By the same token, one could point to the prejudiced language of many of those who have spread vitriol in the cause of Discovery apologetics. Even looking past the hateful name-calling some employ in response to the slightest trace of disdain for the show (pro-tip: continuity concerns do not justify claims of bigotry), a shocking number of those claiming to be anti-bigotry Discovery fans are themselves spreading the modern varieties of acceptable bigotry, and with a straight face.
This thread was about a YouTube video of the premiere episode and expended to discussing the commenters beneath said YouTube video. You came in acting all defensive with a completely unrelated example as if it was criticism of all critics and reviewers of Discovery.Rather than attempt to damn or defend the show by pointing to its strangest fans and holding them up as some sort of rallying cry and ad hominem against the critic or defender . . . such nonsense being a common tool among the political hate-monger monsters of our era, be it Hannity or Maddow . . . it is far better to consider the statements made and judge them on their own merits, sans tribalism. After all, we see what further fracturing that leads to.
This is a strawman. You introduced a completely unrelated to the discussion example that —regardless of what one thinks of its accuracy— is a detailed and measured review of the episode that doesn't complain about how the straight white man is a victim or SJWs or PC; just the merits of the episode's content. I've got no objections to that review or the reviewer whatsoever except perhaps on some of its details, but that's besides the point being made here. That has jack squat to do with YouTube commenters. No one was saying all critics of DSC are the same or as bad as YouTube commenters.For instance, read the breakdown of the plot "Brother" linked below . . . you can even skip to the red and blue text . . . and tell me how there is hate in that, and why it should therefore be ignored:
https://crudereviews.net/2019/01/23/discovery-in-depth-continuity-and-the-shelby-method/amp/
Nope.I've seen that same mentality among a lot of apologists for the series.![]()
https://www.rottentomatoes.com/tv/star_trek_discovery/s02 29% likeRottom Tomatoes: Average Audience Score Comparison
https://www.rottentomatoes.com/tv/star_trek? 86% like
https://www.rottentomatoes.com/tv/star_trek_the_next_generation/ 83% like
https://www.rottentomatoes.com/tv/star_trek_deep_space_nine/ 83% like
https://www.rottentomatoes.com/tv/star_trek_the_animated_series 74% like
https://www.rottentomatoes.com/tv/star_trek_voyager/ 67% like
https://www.rottentomatoes.com/tv/star_trek_enterprise/ 67% like
https://www.rottentomatoes.com/tv/star_trek_discovery/ 51% like
That sucks. There an excuse or conspiracy theory to explain how this show is so great but that number is so low?
On IMDB they don't count all the ratings. The score they give is not a result of the raw data. They filter out the extreme ratingsIMDB's Ratings
TOS - 8.3 (link)
TNG - 8.6 (link)
DS9 - 7.9 (link)
VOY - 7.7 (link)
ENT - 7.5 (link)
DSC - 7.4 (link)
This is what happens when you DON'T have #Haters who are trying to over-inflate a site with negative ratings, and when you don't have have a disproportionate number of over-reactionaries voting.
Not to mention IMDB has more voters than Rotten Tomatoes and is thus a better representation of overall opinions all the way around.
Absolutely.Being streaming, this number is pretty much meaningless. All that matters is that enough folks are subscribing to All Access, watching on Netflix.
Once they have the next Trek show they can let it go to the delight of all...Cancelling the show would be terrible PR for CBSAA. They can't let this thing fail.
Rottom Tomatoes: Average Audience Score Comparison
https://www.rottentomatoes.com/tv/star_trek? 86% like
https://www.rottentomatoes.com/tv/star_trek_the_next_generation/ 83% like
https://www.rottentomatoes.com/tv/star_trek_deep_space_nine/ 83% like
https://www.rottentomatoes.com/tv/star_trek_the_animated_series 74% like
https://www.rottentomatoes.com/tv/star_trek_voyager/ 67% like
https://www.rottentomatoes.com/tv/star_trek_enterprise/ 67% like
https://www.rottentomatoes.com/tv/star_trek_discovery/ 51% like
That sucks. There an excuse or conspiracy theory to explain how this show is so great but that number is so low?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.