• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Could the OG Enterprise have been recovered and rebuilt at all after ST III?

That actually makes quite a bit of sense, given how close the two ships are in the film. (In the novelization they’re presumably a lot farther away from each other, and the Enterprise does go up like a star, instead of the piecemeal blowup.)
Why would Our Heroes want the E to go up like a star? They beamed down to Genesis from orbit, so if the E goes up like a star then they might as well have just stayed aboard her. They're equally dead either way.
 
Assuming the E hadn't burned up over Genesis, I'd say that if any significant parts of it were salvageable then that would indicate that the self-destruct system failed to work properly.
The Enterprise was basically a piece of junk after she self-destructed. Catastrophic damage to the spaceframe and likely every onboard system fried to extra crispy from the computer core to the main energizers. If the main intent of self-destruct was to simply render the ship trash and worthless to an enemy as a tactical asset, then it probably worked as planned. Burning up in a planetary atmosphere may have been an actual bonus, IMO, ensuring that none of the Enterprise's remains could have been used as propaganda by the Klingons.
 
There has to be some sort of difference between "A bunch of folk on the bridge are going to fancy talk our way to a self destruct countdown" and whatever Scott was going to do to take out Vejur.

Also, Kirk didn't want to take out every ship in the area with a matter / antimatter supernova. He still needed a ride.

(Still No.)
 
There has to be some sort of difference between "A bunch of folk on the bridge are going to fancy talk our way to a self destruct countdown" and whatever Scott was going to do to take out Vejur.

I think Mr. Scott's Guide to the Enterprise had the idea of different types of self-destruct.
 
Per Mr. Scott's Guide to the Enterprise (paraphrasing)...

A self-destruct sequence that ends with "destruct zero" was to be used while in orbit of a planet or in close proximity to a space station or other allied vessels (that likely includes escape pods). It would be a more self-contained demise. It would destroy all of the ship's internal systems, ruin key structural points, and leave the entire vessel a lifeless wrecked derelict.

A self-destruct sequence that ends with "destruct one" was to be used in open space, and would vaporize the entire vessel via an uncontrolled detonation.

IMO, the second option is when you intend to die in a literal blaze of glory and take everyone nearby with you, friend and foe alike.
 

The Enterprise-A is actually the original Enterprise.

The Enterprise was set to be refit, but Starfleet also started work on the first new Enterprise subclass ship. As both neared the end, it became clear that the Enterprise refit wouldn't be ready to launch the class, so the two were flipped. The new build would become the Enterprise NCC-1701, while the Enterprise herself would be renamed to whatever name that new ship would've been.

However, the refit Enterprise would become a testbed for new technologies over the intervening years. Never actually having an official name though probably having an NX designation.

Then, when Starfleet gets caught over a barrel, not really having a ship to give Kirk and his band of rebels, they pulled the actual refit 1701 off of the testing grounds and gave it to Kirk, to become the 1701-A. Explaining why it was a mess. It was a testbed with tons of conflicting technologies that were never intended to work together over the long term.

So when the seemingly young Enterprise-A is retired at the end of the Battle at Khitomer, it is because it isn't young at all...
 
Absolutely rubbish autodestruct if she can be recovered afterwards. I imagine all her internals were burnt out as we saw with the saucer section prior to explosion.
 

I like your theory.

At first I thought you were gonna say that the refit Enterprise from TMP wasn't the OG Enterprise because she had all of her exterior replaced and (according to what I read) every single bit of her interior taken out and replaced as well so essentially, it was basically a completely new ship with nothing from TOS remaining.
 
I like to think that the original plan for the Enterprise's refit was only to upgrade her engines, but one thing led to another, some other new technologies became available, and the whole thing kind of spiraled out of control, leading to an unplanned redesign of the entire vessel. While for all intents and purposes, the refit Enterprise is a totally new vessel, I like to imagine that there are still a few internal spaceframe members and trusses of the original configuration here and there. Maybe only a tiny percentage, and not detectable without a tricorder, but at least something.
 
I like to think that the original plan for the Enterprise's refit was only to upgrade her engines, but one thing led to another, some other new technologies became available, and the whole thing kind of spiraled out of control, leading to an unplanned redesign of the entire vessel. While for all intents and purposes, the refit Enterprise is a totally new vessel, I like to imagine that there are still a few internal spaceframe members and trusses of the original configuration here and there. Maybe only a tiny percentage, and not detectable without a tricorder, but at least something.

So you're saying engineers LOVE to change things.
 
Every system mentioned after our heroes stole the Enterprise was not functioning properly. It i very much reasonably The self destructive system also not probably work oom right

The gravity was fine. And that's tied to the self destruct.

And the Genesis Planet wasn't working either. That's why it atomized what was left of the pieces of the Enterprise.
 
I like to think that the original plan for the Enterprise's refit was only to upgrade her engines, but one thing led to another, some other new technologies became available, and the whole thing kind of spiraled out of control, leading to an unplanned redesign of the entire vessel. While for all intents and purposes, the refit Enterprise is a totally new vessel, I like to imagine that there are still a few internal spaceframe members and trusses of the original configuration here and there. Maybe only a tiny percentage, and not detectable without a tricorder, but at least something.
Yeah Imagine there were spine and bulkheads that were from the Robert April era while deck plating, etc and hull plates were essentially new.

Does make an interesting Ship of Theseus question if those parts could be re-assembled, but imagine most went into recycling.
 
Somewhat related to this topic, but I wish that Berman and crew hadn't been so keen on destroying the E-D completely. Instead, the star drive could have survived and received a refit (new nacelles and other minor tweaks) with a new and smaller saucer section. They could have had Probert return and design the refit, providing some nice symmetry with TMP.

As for the Enterprise's destruction, I love the TOS films but I still think destroying her was a mistake. The notion that she was "twenty years old" and due for decommissioning is ridiculous. Enterprise could have survived and then received a repair and refit in TVH. All that's needed is a time jump of some weeks or months between the hearing and the relaunch.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top