• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Continuity

Frankly, what irritates the living hell out of me is the implication that I'M the fucking moron because I didn't think this was the greatest Star Trek event ever. Well, sorry, kids, but the movie was flawed in areas that I cannot, and will not, simply overlook for the sake of getting along and on the stance that "bad Trek is better than no Trek," because that way only leads to more bad Trek.

A version of Picard's "The line must be drawn HERE!" speech comes to mind, but I think the humor would be lost on some folks.
Now that's well said. :techman:
 
Dayton, if I thought you were a fucking moron, I'd say flat out that you're a fucking moron, right after I made sure my life insurance was paid up. No need to draw inferences.

The fact is, I don't think enjoying the movie qualifies anyone as a moron, especially if they're honest about the flaws. By that criteria, I only question their taste in movies, but then I'm quite fond of "Tank Girl", so I can't throw many stones from that standpoint.

Frankly, what irritates the living hell out of me is the implication that I'M the fucking moron because I didn't think this was the greatest Star Trek event ever. Well, sorry, kids, but the movie was flawed in areas that I cannot, and will not, simply overlook for the sake of getting along and on the stance that "bad Trek is better than no Trek," because that way only leads to more bad Trek.

A version of Picard's "The line must be drawn HERE!" speech comes to mind, but I think the humor would be lost on some folks.
Sorry I just can't buy this. Your "style" of "criticism" is just too well known.
 
Dayton, if I thought you were a fucking moron, I'd say flat out that you're a fucking moron, right after I made sure my life insurance was paid up. No need to draw inferences.

The fact is, I don't think enjoying the movie qualifies anyone as a moron, especially if they're honest about the flaws. By that criteria, I only question their taste in movies, but then I'm quite fond of "Tank Girl", so I can't throw many stones from that standpoint.

Frankly, what irritates the living hell out of me is the implication that I'M the fucking moron because I didn't think this was the greatest Star Trek event ever. Well, sorry, kids, but the movie was flawed in areas that I cannot, and will not, simply overlook for the sake of getting along and on the stance that "bad Trek is better than no Trek," because that way only leads to more bad Trek.

A version of Picard's "The line must be drawn HERE!" speech comes to mind, but I think the humor would be lost on some folks.
I don't like the two tricks you used here.
1: If we liked it we're kids.
2: That we were just happy to get any Trek, and were unable to see that it was apparently bad because we were so happy to have some more.
 
I can't wait for Kirk to make Admiral in the next movie.

I don't think that's going to happen so soon after the first JJ Abrams Star Trek movie. This is why I think that: We all know that admirals don't get to go on space missions ery often, they usually have a cushy desk job on Earth, on a space station, or some Federation outpost. Admirals do the ordering, the captains and below do their bidding. Itwould be a very boring movie if they made Kirk an admiral in the second Trek movie.
 
I can't wait for Kirk to make Admiral in the next movie.

I don't think that's going to happen so soon after the first JJ Abrams Star Trek movie. This is why I think that: We all know that admirals don't get to go on space missions very often, they usually have a cushy desk job on Earth, on a space station, or some Federation outpost. Admirals do the ordering, the captains and below do their bidding. It would be a very boring movie if they made Kirk an admiral in the second Trek movie.
 
Yes, they destroyed Vulcan. In one swoop, they demonstrated that this isn't the same timeline/reality/whatever as the original versions of these characters, and told audiences that "All bets are off. Nobody and nothing is safe. Buckle up."

That was exactly the message I got - all bets are off - and it felt a little too blustery for me -- ie, it felt like they were over-compensating, choosing to do this thing not for story reasons, not for compelling drama, but moreso to say "this ain't your daddy's star trek! in your face!" to go all rebel-rebel and spit in the eye of something that actually WORKED for the series to gain a kind of freedom that they could have felt they had regardless.... Again, perhaps there was another way to have done it that would have felt less 'sacrilegious' and actually 'out of the film' though I have to say the Amanda moment had me enjoyably gutted, so its not all complaints here! As it happened, it just didn't feel like the greatest story choice, full stop. That, and I cried for the possibly unborn Tuvok (just kidding... sorta).

As for Kirk the troubled kid....is there anything in the canon to refute this? No. Indeed, there's nothing at all, which is why Diane Carey was able to fashion a backstory for Kirk as just such a troubled young man for her novels. ... In the "real" universe, we're to believe that Kirk was one of the youngest people ever to attain command of a starship....29, if we're to believe conjecture put forth in various sources. I'll give you that the circumstances of Kirk's rapid promotion in the film are unbelievable, but it's not worth having a stroke over. Weirder things have happened in fiction and...besides...we don't know the "real" circumstances under which he got to command the Enterprise. There are no less than three versions of that story, none of them canon.
I guess ultimately my gripe here isn't "is it canon or not" but simply, is it rewarding to me story-wise to have this 'troubled child' thing happen - is this a strong story-telling choice or is it not. Clearly, I thought it was a weak choice - seemed to me a kind of Luke Skywalker/James Dean-lite, but I do appreciate what they were trying to do with the Spock/Kirk orphans parallel thing - just a little ham-fisted/overly melodramatic/trite in my opinion. But having said that, the attack on the Kelvin and the death of George Kirk in the opening scene was definitely the highlight of the film to me.

I haven't read those Carey novels, but they are on my list!

The promotion thing is even more odd/forced to me - and is one of the things that did kind of leave me right at the end of the film feeling like my intelligence was being neglected! Though perhaps this will grow on me and/or fade from memory - I mean I do want to see the adventures of Captain Kirk, the great leader after all, not Ensign Kirk. But I am not necessarily decrying any of these things in particular for defying any sort of established canon per se. Nor am I personally having a stroke - this is Star Trek, it brings me pleasure to varying degrees, that's all!

if the crews on previous productions had possessed the kind of budget and studio support this film enjoyed, I have no doubt we'd have seen this kind of thing a lot sooner. Paramount's wanted Trek to go toe-to-toe with Star Wars for 30+ years.
And I'm sure you're right, so in some ways my complaints about ST09 are my same complaints with mainstream film in general these days -- eye candy and breathless kinetic visuals trump story, ideas, imagination, and a sense of wonder every time, and that's just a commercial reality when trying to get people into a theater. So I can't realistically blame the new creators for their decision... but I can blame society!

This just highlights to me how after so many years, and with such a paltry budget, the original series is so enduring - clearly not for its production value, but for its heart and soul. Sometimes greater limits make for greater art. Hopefully some of that can still find its way into a mega-millions blockbuster again.
 
i thought Trek 09 was a flying pile of crap not because it violated continuity but because the story was shit and i FUCKING HATE LENS FLARES! AND BREWERY ENGINE ROOMS!

the characters were ok. the ship was too huge though.
 
i thought Trek 09 was a flying pile of crap not because it violated continuity but because the story was shit and i FUCKING HATE LENS FLARES! AND BREWERY ENGINE ROOMS!

the characters were ok. the ship was too huge though.
Yep. But if you say that to the film's fans they'll say you're just trying to rationalize your predisposed hate for the film. :lol:
 
^ I'm a huge fan of the film and I'd never say that. Those are both thoroughly valid reasons to be annoyed at the movie. I just disagree with them.

Demonization of people that disagree with you on the internet is really easy, and always cheap. There's probably someone who would post something like what you suggest, but certainly not all of "the film's fans" fall into that category.
 
^^ You're right, not all would say that. And those I've met in real life have never said it either. But I've run into a few around here who actually do say that.
 
There's plenty of them around here that do. Just take a stroll through the Trek XI forum, it's littered with the remains of those who dared to challenge the notion that this was THE GREATEST STAR TREK EVENT EVAH!!
 
I can't wait for Kirk to make Admiral in the next movie.

I don't think that's going to happen so soon after the first JJ Abrams Star Trek movie. This is why I think that: We all know that admirals don't get to go on space missions ery often, they usually have a cushy desk job on Earth, on a space station, or some Federation outpost. Admirals do the ordering, the captains and below do their bidding. Itwould be a very boring movie if they made Kirk an admiral in the second Trek movie.

Which is why they're gonna leapfrog past all that admiral nonsense and just appoint him Federation President. For life.
 
There's plenty of them around here that do. Just take a stroll through the Trek XI forum, it's littered with the remains of those who dared to challenge the notion that this was THE GREATEST STAR TREK EVENT EVAH!!

I can't wait for Kirk to make Admiral in the next movie.

I don't think that's going to happen so soon after the first JJ Abrams Star Trek movie. This is why I think that: We all know that admirals don't get to go on space missions ery often, they usually have a cushy desk job on Earth, on a space station, or some Federation outpost. Admirals do the ordering, the captains and below do their bidding. Itwould be a very boring movie if they made Kirk an admiral in the second Trek movie.

Which is why they're gonna leapfrog past all that admiral nonsense and just appoint him Federation President. For life.

For god's sake man, learn to use the multi quote tool or begin to edit your posts when you have something more to say, the ability to edit a post doesn't stop a minute or two after you've posted!
 
i thought Trek 09 was a flying pile of crap not because it violated continuity but because the story was shit and i FUCKING HATE LENS FLARES! AND BREWERY ENGINE ROOMS!

the characters were ok. the ship was too huge though.
Yep. But if you say that to the film's fans they'll say you're just trying to rationalize your predisposed hate for the film. :lol:

In all honesty, given on you what post and ideas, I would say they were correct.

Of course, Kirk would not make Admiral in the next especially when that poster was sarcastic.

I hope in the next movie, Kirk and Spock will get thrown back in time to 21st Century and beat up nerds who love this show call Space Journey because Space Journey XI did not fit in their personal canon of Space Journey: The First Show in which their opinion was the only Space Journey, because Space Journey: Hundred Years Later, Space Journey: Space Station Five, Space Journey: Pathfinder, and the critically acclaimed Space Journey: First Journey. Sometimes people say that Space Journey: The Anime Series is not canon, but recently Big Time Studios put them out on Blu-Ray, so its ok now.
 
There's plenty of them around here that do. Just take a stroll through the Trek XI forum, it's littered with the remains of those who dared to challenge the notion that this was THE GREATEST STAR TREK EVENT EVAH!!
Nah, they give as good as they get and can dig their heels with the same resolve as their opponents. Very few of which have ever said "THE GREATEST STAR TREK EVENT EVAH!!" The head spinning, spittle flinging "critics" are fun to watch, though. Their points would probably be taken more seriously if they were not so firmly mired in hysteria, hyperbole and ad hominem.
 
^Yeah, but is AstroQuest Redux ever going to air? ;)

The studio heads want a complete reboot, while the writers and the director that was originally hired, disagreed, so AstroQuest II: The Search for Delta Vega was cancelled. Right now AstroQuests in pre-production.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top