• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Alien civilisations too stupid to exist.

They're mildly entertaining, but he does have a tendency to throw out totally bullshit arguments. In the Avatar sequence he seriously claims that historical empires can't be built on the basis of a profit motive which is a mind-bogglingly ignorant statement, historically speaking. He tags the Borg for being vulnerable to viruses as if that kind of vulnerability doesn't exist in almost every species. And he seems to have completely missed the point of District 9 to be trying to interpret any of the images from that movie as being truly reflective on the prawns' whole society in any way. You might as well judge humanity on the basis of watching Jersey Shore.
 
They're mildly entertaining, but he does have a tendency to throw out totally bullshit arguments. In the Avatar sequence he seriously claims that historical empires can't be built on the basis of a profit motive which is a mind-bogglingly ignorant statement, historically speaking. He tags the Borg for being vulnerable to viruses as if that kind of vulnerability doesn't exist in almost every species. And he seems to have completely missed the point of District 9 to be trying to interpret any of the images from that movie as being truly reflective on the prawns' whole society in any way. You might as well judge humanity on the basis of watching Jersey Shore.

I tend to agree. While entertaining his series did miss a few points such as the ones you raised. I thought his one on the Borg was wrong in a lot of areas and yeah the District 9 one was wrong in more ways then one. But as a short series I had a little fun watching those.
 
Interesting.

It made me think of the Krell alluded to in "The Forbidden Planet". They were smart enough to build technology of limitless power and mind control, but did not think to put safeguards in the systems they built. It's hard to imagine they could have survived as a species for as long as they did, if they possessed such fallibility and recklessness.
 
Interesting.

It made me think of the Krell alluded to in "The Forbidden Planet". They were smart enough to build technology of limitless power and mind control, but did not think to put safeguards in the systems they built. It's hard to imagine they could have survived as a species for as long as they did, if they possessed such fallibility and recklessness.

Hubris.

I think it never occurred to the Krell that any of the things they made would ever come back to hurt them, and that they had complete mastery of their technology.
 
Yes. And they also thought they mastered their own minds.

That too, it honestly must never have occurred to the Krell that their minds too were a source of danger when combined with their technology till it was too late.

Watching those videos again I must admit the super stupid award should go to the Psychlos.. Morons
 
Have you ever seen pictures of some of the weird animals that have existed on this planet? Of course, they're extinct now but they must have been viable for a time.
 
The problem with animals that are different in any way is that scientists can't even agree on why that's the case. For example, the plumage of a peacock. What's with the "eyes" and why such a big ass tail when other bird species still manage to get laid without it. Or why did Platybelodons have to be the only elephant with a giant duck-billed mouth like that? Paleontologists don't have a clue, not a friggin' clue. So, when the experts can't bring even their extensive experience to bare on a subject like that, it's hard to plausibly do so, myself. But it does seem as though Human intelligence shaped our own body plan from something obviously very animalistic to something more aesthetically agreeable, shall we say.

Big, boney brows over the eyes, excessive hairiness and hunched over gates were gradually given over to much smoother, streamlined features and I have to believe that part of the reason was due to our ancestors not digging the animalistic look, anymore. I can't imagine an alien species wishing to retain its primitive traits anymore than we did. Even now, consider someone who's got a low forehead, how unattractive that can be. And why? Because it's sort of a primitive trait that's no longer favoured. So, when I see these examples of aliens that look like something George Lucas farted out, it doesn't ring true.
 
Humans defined aesthetically agreeable because no one else understands aesthetics. You're basically just saying we continually redefined the word 'beautiful' to always mean 'what we look like'.

Also, aliens could just as easily be primarily dependent on their sense of smell or sound and have terrible eyesight. Visual beauty need not even be a concept they would understand.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top