While I am a fan of Bryan Fuller and many of his shows I am kinda glad he left Discovery last year. It now seems he has exited the project that he left Discovery for .............http://variety.com/2017/tv/news/american-gods-1202626402/
Season 1 covers maybe 1/4 to 1/3 of the novel.I keep thinking I'd like to go back to try the show again - does this mean that S1 doesn't coincide with the end of the book?
dJE
With the stuff that worked the best bring stuff expanded from the novel (Laura’s story).Season 1 covers maybe 1/4 to 1/3 of the novel.
Only to leave again?Maybe he can now return to DSC just in time for Season 2?![]()
![]()
I'd have to conjecture that a good deal of Discovery's somewhat confused vision in the first several episodes was based on Fuller's path vs. the path and style of the writers and producers who took over.
If that's true, I'd much rather Fuller not return. DSC seems to have only gotten increasingly better as it has progressed, which to me indicates that I probably wouldn't have liked Fuller's full-on version of Star Trek. It will be interesting to see what the new staff does once they even more distinctly separate from that vision.
Wow, this guy can't finish a project.
1. Paragraph 1 looks like a Strawman - build up an argument on speculation and make a conclusion with no facts but the speculation to knock him down.
Of course. For American Gods Season 3.Only to leave again?
Your timeline is all wrong.Fuller was let go. A new creative team took over. People like Beyer were taken on board. The first four episodes were already filmed when they began retooling STD. I don't see the strawman.
Vger did specify it was conjecture. The accusation that Vger is trying to knock him (Fuller) down is a little over the top.1. Paragraph 1 looks like a Strawman - build up an argument on speculation and make a conclusion with no facts but the speculation to knock him down.
Ummm, that's almost all that ever goes on around here... assumptions and speculation. Take that away and there are only cute kitten pics.2. Paragraph 2 is an assumption that cannot be proven without going back in time to rerun history with Fuller staying with Discovery.
1. Paragraph 1 looks like a Strawman - build up an argument on speculation and make a conclusion with no facts but the speculation to knock him down.
2. Paragraph 2 is an assumption that cannot be proven without going back in time to rerun history with Fuller staying with Discovery.
Now this one is based upon solid observation, and stole the exact words I came here to post. LOL.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.