• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

The Maple Leaf Lounge

Huh, interesting that they would be 'sold' out. There was no such limit when they were advertising him here, but as you say, it's definitely encouraging to hear that people are turning out.

Oh and yeah speaking of riding boundaries, ours have changed too, and I only wish the government would have made more of an effort to educate the masses about the changes, because it wasn't until I was at the event in question that I knew ridings had changed. There are going to be a lot of confused people come election day about which riding they belong to. And looking up my riding, our Liberal candidate hasn't even been confirmed yet.

I was surprised at the word "sold" as it never occurred to me that it would cost anything to get in. But I guess he's not crisscrossing the country and renting venues all out of his own pocket, so it makes sense.

I don't know where he's going to be in Edmonton, but if they weren't expecting many people (this being such a non-NDP-friendly region), they may have picked a smaller place and got a bigger turnout than expected.


Well, I've found out that Elections Canada is still ableist, in spite of pages and pages of blather in the Returning Officers' manual (freely available online if anyone fancies reading how elections are conducted from a polling station point of view). There's a lot of talk about accessibility and how to speak respectfully to disabled people, but not one syllable about in-home special ballots. I called to ask if they're still available, and was told yes, so that's one question I plan to put into my complaint when I draft it.

Back in 2019 I ran into this crap about the rules of in-home special ballots. Apparently disability is one-size-fits-all, and if you're disabled in your mobility, you're also incapable of reading and writing. The Returning Officer I spoke to a little while ago told me that they would be reading the list of candidates to me, I'd tell them who I wanted to vote for, and they would write the name on the ballot for me.

And then I'd sign the envelope and other paperwork myself (the declaration of eligibility and that I hadn't already voted).

This is so fucking WRONG. There is NO reason why someone who is capable of reading and writing shouldn't be allowed to write the candidate's name on the ballot, put the ballot in the envelope, sign and seal the envelope, and go through the rest of the rigamarole if their disability is something that doesn't include reading or writing.

Everyone else in the country gets to vote by secret ballot. Why don't we?

Note that I have no objection to a disabled person or someone who isn't fluent in English/French asking for help to vote. That is absolutely their right, and when I was a municipal DRO, I dealt with a situation where a blind voter needed help. But it was her husband who helped her, and after he did the requisite paperwork (an oath to mark the ballot as the "incapacitated elector" says to), they went off to vote, and I wasn't involved any further.

The Returning Officer said she had to take an oath of confidentiality, but I told her that wasn't the point. Every Elections Canada worker has to take an oath of confidentiality. The point is that my vote is between me, my conscience, and the ballot. Nobody else. There's a double-system of envelopes used so they know I've voted by special ballot, but by the time that ballot is counted, they can't match specific people with specific ballots.

I really object to being forced to tell anyone who I'm voting for. And if I'm expected to sign the envelope, why can't I do a proper secret ballot?

I made a complaint about this YEARS ago, and obviously not one damn thing was done about it. I don't even know if the Returning Officer at that time bothered to read it.

When they come, I will be presenting them with a piece of paper on which I've written the candidate's name. They can copy from that. I refuse to be labeled as illiterate just because other parts of me don't work right.

So much for inclusiveness and the Charter.
 
I was surprised at the word "sold" as it never occurred to me that it would cost anything to get in. But I guess he's not crisscrossing the country and renting venues all out of his own pocket, so it makes sense.

I don't think it refers to any actual seat sold, but rather the number of seats available. Ours was free, but done by the backing of the local NDP parties.

And back in 2016 when Chris Hadfield was putting on a local free event as part of his tour, when we went to get tickets we found out they were all 'sold out'. Did manage to see him in the neighbouring town though.
 
With the polls showing the liberals with a strong lead and looking governing with a double digit majority the issue has been raised to poiilievre and to his.

the conservative leader ducks the question while his supporters claim the polls are wrong and point to the size of his rallies.

Problem is two fold - a) both sides are full of shit on the attendance numbers based on photographic evidence and venue size and b) rallies are crowds are pretty much the party faithful who were always going to vote for you.

Another article I read (cbc I think) also pointed of that in the U.S election, the Harris rallies tended to be 2x - 3x those of trump and sadly we know who won that one.




 
They'd better have extra security on the Hill on voting day and afterward. PP might not explicitly authorize this, but the Freedumb convoy and some others might get ideas.

I've voted, btw. Special ballot yesterday, and they did let me write on the ballot myself. Looks like logic prevailed, since there was paperwork to sign that I was expected to do myself.
 
I voted today.

Now less than a week to go to see how it all turns out. Hopefully we don't end up going down a similar path to what our neighbours did.
 
I voted today.

Now less than a week to go to see how it all turns out. Hopefully we don't end up going down a similar path to what our neighbours did.

Polls have tightened but look at 338canada.com, their modeling and numbers I think that it's the ndp and bq who''ve had their possible seat count increased and that tories are pretty stagnant.

CBC's modeling has the liberals up a few seats on 338 and the ndp down.

Some very nasty stories circulating in conservative circles about the the liberal but candidate but if there was any sort of truth to them, she wouldn't be the candiate (and there's nothing in her official biog about being a teacher).

staff in the constituency office of the incumbent conservative are being even more useless than ever, They're flat out refusing to help anyone saying there's no point as they'll be out of job next week which is a great vote of confidence.

Only seen one tv add for her and it was simply a montage of photos with music backing. Probably a good thing as opening her mouth usually involves changing feet.

338 shows us a toss by gives the liberal candidate a 67% chance of winning.

and I've love for liberal win see poilievre out of the conservative leader but they may decided to go with some-one even more conservative but it there be some major league in fighting with a lot the blame lying with the leader and his campaign advisor.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top