And from there it'll be "Oh, damn, we can't manage alone, let's join the U.S." And there wouldn't be a thing the Canadian government could do about it.
At least that's probably how she hopes it would go. But people nowadays tend to forget what it was like in the 1990s, with the Quebec situation. Mulroney's Meech Lake Accord didn't work in 1992 because he set the bar high on that - all provinces had to be unanimous, and all MLAs (or whatever they're called in some provinces) had to agree, or at least not disagree. The lone holdout in Manitoba was Elijah Harper, who repeatedly and in the face of increasing pressure, said "No."
The Charlottetown Accord didn't work, either. I voted No when it came to that. If the 5 different parts of it had been separate, I could have voted yes in at least one of them with a clear conscience. But all 5, together? Nope.
And the Quebec referendum in 1995... that was a squeaker. Rumor has it that the government had the military on standby in case the results favored the Yes side and things got violent.
I wonder if the other provinces would care if Alberta separated, other than it would be much more inconvenient for BC to connect with the rest of the country, since traveling through the U.S. isn't a viable option any longer. Going via the Yukon and NWT would be one hell of a detour. Of course the realists would say our borders wouldn't be shut, since we'd cut ourselves off as well.
But the government in Alberta is about on par with the U.S. government now. We have a delusional sociopath for a premier, and social programs and supports for the low-income/disabled are being cut more and more. Sometimes I wonder if some of my benefits might be cut out of sheer spite, since I haven't been at all shy about voicing my contempt for my MLA (Minister of Gutting Health Care) and our Maple MAGA premier.