I think Tal was really into Spock.![]()
1. the cloaking device is so small and light one person can carry it
My treknobabble head canon: Those things are the important security and technological features of the cloaking device. Firstly, the cloaking device is portable for security reasons; it can be removed and locked up when not in use, and it can be easily destroyed to keep it from falling into enemy hands. Secondly, the device itself is a marvel of technology that controls a ship's deflector shields such to bend light around the ship. It is also designed to universally adaptable to all makes and models of ships used in the Romulan fleet. YMMVthe only 2 things I don't like about this episode are
1. the cloaking device is so small and light one person can carry it
2. it can be quickly plugged and work in a completely different spaceship
I do not find any reference to a Klingon cloaking device in TAS. I believe you might be thinking of the Stasis Field Generator weapon the Klingon ships used in "More Troubles, More Tribbles"I'm pretty sure I remember Klingons having cloaking devices in TAS, so it never bothered me to see Klingon ships with cloaking devices in the movies.
We never learn the Commander's name, although she whispers it to Spock.
Not sure how. Starfleet was aware of cloaking back in "Balance of Terror" and then this new device was updated and require additional espionage in the "Enterprise Incident." It definitely looks more like an arms race, with data needed and updates required to keep the device relevant.Starfleet having it invalidates everything that came after involving cloaking devices (for example the 3rd 5th 6th movies, alot of TNG, almost all of DS9 and on)
Not sure how. Starfleet was aware of cloaking back in "Balance of Terror" and then this new device was updated and require additional espionage in the "Enterprise Incident." It definitely looks more like an arms race, with data needed and updates required to keep the device relevant.
I wonder if that was inspired by Livia, the wife of Augustus?She's probably had a dozen different names in the various novels.
My favorite is the one that the 'extended novelverse' had gone with, Liviana Charvanek.
Memory Alpha asserts that "Liviana" is probably from a role Joanne Linville played in an episode of The Twilight Zone, a character called Lavinia, though I think it's also possible it was riffing on her last name.I wonder if that was inspired by Livia, the wife of Augustus?
Which answers nicely the question as to why/how such an important device could be carried under someone's arm. Kirk didn't need to steal the entire cloaking device. He just needed to steal the new/updated component. Starfleet already knew the basic mechanics of the cloak and that's why Scotty was able to integrate the new component into the Enterprise's existing shield system.
Kinda like the flux capacitor. You don't need to steal the entire DeLorean. You just need to steal the flux capacitor.
She's probably had a dozen different names in the various novels.
My favorite is the one that the 'extended novelverse' had gone with, Liviana Charvanek.
1. the cloaking device is so small and light one person can carry it
2. it can be quickly plugged and work in a completely different spaceship
3. Starfleet having it invalidates everything that came after involving cloaking devices (for example the 3rd 5th 6th movies, alot of TNG, almost all of DS9 and on)
Also in [Star Trek III], Kirk could see a cloaked vessel with his naked eyes (not even wearing his gold spectacles, nor Retinax 5)
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.