• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Star Wars: The Last Jedi - Grading & Discussion

Grade the movie.


  • Total voters
    290
Disney is a publicly traded company, so meeting expectations is far more important than profits. By that measure, last jedi is absolutely a shocking flop. Heads will fly and careers will end.

Timely point. People often forget the production budget alone is not where the expense ends. After the marketing budget, and other costs, a franchise release is expected to perform above and beyond what would be blockbuster earnings from any other film.

IDK, for me at least, Disney Star Wars isn't or will ever be canon to me. Neither will Star Trek Discovery. Hollywood is brain dead. Their scripts are all thinly veiled PSAs and social justice commentary and pandering, that's not entertainment, it's indoctrination under the guise of artistic license and expression.

Well observed. The far Left faction of the entertainment culture is on their neverending mission to shift all culture not to a center, but the fringes where their true beliefs thrive. No one can forget that this is the same entertainment culture that is approving of the one black male in the biggest franchise (Star Wars' Finn) being a segregated, neutered (where Rey is concerned), minstrel better suited to race films of the 1940s than a film made in the second decade of the 21st century. But that's fine, as long as one of their two concerns--"girl power" is pushed.

But since SJW MARVEL comics

Ah, the sweeping push of propaganda titles that launched the biggest critical & sales disaster in Marvel Comics' history. Nothing--not even the sales troubles of the late 40s, or the economic sidelining of the 1970s can come close to the one-two explosive punch of fan abandonment, retailer and toy manufacturers' complaints earned by this recent social/politicized editorial failure for Marvel.

Thanks Kathleen Kennedy, Jar Jar Abrams, Rian Johnson, and Disney. I'm much happier writing off this stuff. Been a long time coming, but now I have the perfect excuse to cut out Star Wars and Star Trek from my collection, except of course the classic stuff. Ever wonder why Vader merchandise is always sold out, better then Kylo Ren...cause the OT works, the new stuff sucks. There, I said it.

...and you can always spot endless Rey, Poe and Finn figures hanging on retailer pegs. This is not the Star Wars toy boom seen during the original trilogy period.
 
There's two sides to every story. There are fans who continually defend Disney Star Wars, and those who attack. Its the essence of the free exchange of ideas, regardless of the outcome. Diminished returns is a gamble Disney is willing to take to milk the franchise dry like Luke with his space cow juice. So I agree with you there. But this is a fandom discussion about Disney Star Wars. Whether we like it or not, it's important to discuss the failings and triumphs in the hopes that maybe they'll get it right. I still say Disney is treating Star Wars like Marvel Legacy..which bombed..to do it with all the legacy characters, killing them off and replacing them with new versions, is very Hollywood, and very calous and cruel to the traditional fans. Which almost feels like Disney thinks the original fans don't matter..their money does, and maybe they think just because they put "Star Wars" on a movie, those dissed fans will still buy.

And yet... Every Disney star wars film so far has featured legacy characters.

Yes they may seem like they're killing them off but as one is dead in real life and another wanted killing off in-universe to say nothing about the remaining actors respective ages and health it doesn't leave that many options no? Disney have to think of the future of the franchise and introduce new characters as they go along, which is something star wars has done from the beginning.
 
Last edited:
Well observed. The far Left faction of the entertainment culture is on their neverending mission to shift all culture not to a center, but the fringes where their true beliefs thrive. No one can forget that this is the same entertainment culture that is approving of the one black male in the biggest franchise (Star Wars' Finn) being a segregated, neutered (where Rey is concerned), minstrel better suited to race films of the 1940s than a film made in the second decade of the 21st century. But that's fine, as long as one of their two concerns--"girl power" is pushed.



Ah, the sweeping push of propaganda titles that launched the biggest critical & sales disaster in Marvel Comics' history. Nothing--not even the sales troubles of the late 40s, or the economic sidelining of the 1970s can come close to the one-two explosive punch of fan abandonment, retailer and toy manufacturers' complaints earned by this recent social/politicized editorial failure for Marvel.
I'd rather see a company work to improve their diversity and lose money, then see them give in to the racist, sexist, idiot fucktards and give us an endless parade of nothing but straight white guys. I know some people just can't handle the fact that there are people out there who aren't white or straight, and can't stand a woman who does more than cook, clean and pop out babies, but I don't think the rest of us should who want to see more diversity in their media should be forced to give in to them just because they can't handle the way the real world looks today.

...and you can always spot endless Rey, Poe and Finn figures hanging on retailer pegs. This is not the Star Wars toy boom seen during the original trilogy period.
That reason the stuff sits there for so long is because since they make a big event out of the release so everybody rushes out in the first week or two to get everything. I work at Wal-Mart and the last two Force Fridays the figures and other toys were flying off the shelves. It's also worth keeping in mind that a lot of people also buy figures and things online, especially the older nerds who are SW's target audience.
 
Last edited:
I think the anti-SJW rhetoric obscures the underlying problems of trying to introduce a next generation of characters and pass the torch. The same problems happened in Trek. Remember that Phase II idea was supposed to gradually pass the torch to Xon, Decker, Ilia. Then we had Next Generation, etc...

Just beause franchise owners say "here are your new heroes" doesn't mean the public will embrace them with open arms. This has to do with the question of what makes a franchise successful in the first place.

You've seen the Star Wars audition videos, right? Would we be having this discussion if William Katt or any of the others had been cast? I'd say no. Introducing characters to the audience is sort of like a blind date. Either the chemistry pops or it doesn't. Lightning doesn't strike twice.

I also think the storytelling in Force Awakens, which was continued in Last Jedi via not having a story gap in the middle and fast-tracking Rey's "training", only reinforces the idea of Rey as a Mary Sue. Add in a 2 rather than 3 year gap and you have this A.D.D. effect of "OK, here's your hero, let's jam a saber in her hand and cut to the action!" effect.

Star Wars simply needs MORE TIME to percolate down through pop culture, and absence makes the heart grow fonder, which is why Luke was the real driver of the pathos in this film, just as Han was in Force Awakens. The OT characters get in the way, and yet if they were not there, the others still aren't really standing on their own.

The grinding attrition of the resistance fleet is sort of analogous to the deaths of one OT icon after another. Meanwhile the fans are tapping their feet waiting for the new characters to win us over.
 
Just because franchise owners say "here are your new heroes" doesn't mean the public will embrace them with open arms.

The public are embracing it though, just because a LOUD but at the end of the day a minority are spewing their opinions online changes nothing. Disney version of Star Wars is a multi billion dollar Empire and they are adding new fans for any old fans they may lose just like the PT did.

TLA will make A billion and then some and even Solo will make hundreds of millions even if it's under performs. Episode 9 will open huge and probably make another billion at worst. Star Wars is going nowhere and Disney will make films for this generation for some time to come.
 
I'd rather see a company work to improve their diversity and lose money, then see them give in to the racist, sexist, idiot fucktards and give us an endless parade of nothing but straight white guys.

The Left has just shifted it to empowering white females. African American actors & actresses have complained about that for years, while on the larger political landscape, innumerable African Americans have blasted the predominately white-controlled Left for paying lip service to equality (and used the blood and struggle of the Civil Rights Movement to promote their own causes) while clearly having issues with black identity, and in Hollywood, casting (more often than not) black people as stereotypes of minstrels (Finn), "angry", some sort of "street" person, or ghetto stereotype. That's not coming from Rupert Murdoch/Fox, Rush Limbaugh, Trump, the Alt-Right cult or the RNC, but those who package and sell themselves and their agenda as the most forward-thinking, finger-wagging, tolerant of all, which makes the Hollywood Limousine Liberals stuffed with hypocritical, offensive bullshit. That's why in a new Star Wars trilogy produced in this--the second decade of the 21st century, where Hollywood and their political acolytes are riding the bullet train of an alleged equality train, Finn is a stumbling, easily defeated jive-clown who--as of The Last Jedi--is shoved into a nonexistent romance with a new character, all to keep him away from the white woman. Too many Hollywood Limousine Liberals have as much resentment about that kind of relationship as anyone on the Right, and its all laid out on screen.

I know some people just can't handle the fact that there are people out there who aren't white or straight, and can't stand a woman who does more than cook, clean and pop out babies, but I don't think the rest of us should who want to see more diversity in their media should be forced to give in to them just because they can't handle the way the real world looks today.

There's a monumental difference between a strong female (e.g. Ripley in Alien & Aliens) who is either strong from the start, or naturally, believably shows fortitude after a conflict, and the rip-an-established-format-and-plot all to play into the Mary Sue agenda seen in the Star Wars sequel movies. Its an insult to all of the strong female characters who came decades before to even whisper Rey as being some sort of threat to alleged sexist belief, when its clear she is just one of many characters at the forefront of the current misandrist campaign. Only with this film series, misandry is coupled with hardline racial stereotypes.

That reason the stuff sits there for so long is because since they make a big event out of the release so everybody rushes out in the first week or two to get everything. I work at Wal-Mart and the last two Force Fridays the figures and other toys were flying off the shelves. It's also worth keeping in mind that a lot of people also buy figures and things online, especially the older nerds who are SW's target audience.

Funny. The stores in my region which stocked TLJ toys months before the film's release, including several Wal-Mart supercenters, Target, grocery and book stores--were filled with unsold toys. When the film was released (keep in mind that was during the hot point of the Christmas shopping season), again, I noticed figures being nothing more than peg warmers. The best-selling sequel series toys are usually the interactive BB-8, R2 and a few ship toys, but Rey, Finn and Poe figures are not hot sellers.
 
Last edited:
Apparently, this was the ship which Rey saw flying away in her vision in The Force Awakens (I don't know the source; it's labelled "family ship", implying it was owned by her family, or at least supposed to be when this sketch was made): http://i.imgur.com/JP75vLr.jpg

Does not really match those junkies who died in a desert, and since they went to the trouble of designing the thing I guess there was originally more significance to it.

Allthough I don't object to Rey's parents not being famous, I think Disney is treating this the wrong way. Almost everybody's parents are "nobodies", by their definition. None of us is heartbroken that we aren't sons/daughters of presidents or rock stars, I'm fairly sure. The point is that they abandoned her, apparently because they didn't care about her. That's the implication that should hurt Rey, not how famous or unfamous her parents were. Besides, in "The Force Awakens" she was only concerned with her family's return, and she initially ran away from a (glorious?) "destiny" in the form of the force visions.

Also, Rey may not be born of famous parents, but that doesn't mean everbody can do what she did or become what she is becoming. She has a very rare ability that she was born with, so it's still her birth that privileges her. This was true for Luke Skywalker as well, even at the time he wasn't yet supposed to be Vader's son. When she says at the beginning of the movie "it's a force that Jedi have (and others, by implication, don't have)" she is far closer to the truth then Luke cares to admit. The Force may be everywhere, but only a very small percentage of Force users can tap into it.
 
The Left has just shifted it to empowering white females. African American actors & actresses have complained about that for years, while on the larger political landscape, innumerable African Americans have blasted the predominately white-controlled Left for paying lip service to equality (and used the blood and struggle of the Civil Rights Movement to promote their own causes) while clearly having issues with black identity, and in Hollywood, casting (more often than not) black people as stereotypes of minstrels (Finn), "angry", some sort of "street" person, or ghetto stereotype. That's not coming from Rupert Murdoch/Fox, Rush Limbaugh, Trump, the Alt-Right cult or the RNC, but those who package and sell themselves and their agenda as the most forward-thinking, finger-wagging, tolerant of all, which makes the Hollywood Limousine Liberals stuffed with hypocritical, offensive bullshit. That's why in a new Star Wars trilogy produced in this--the second decade of the 21st century, where Hollywood and their political acolytes are riding the bullet train of an alleged equality train, Finn is a stumbling, easily defeated jive-clown who--as of The Last Jedi--is shoved into a nonexistent romance with a new character, all to keep him away from the white woman. Too many Hollywood Limousine Liberals have as much resentment about that kind of relationship as anyone on the Right, and its all laid out on screen
.
I'm asking this purely out of curiosity, but are you black? Or if not have you heard from black fans what they think of Finn?
I'll admit, the whole thing with him being a janitor might not have been the best idea in the world, but I would definitely not go so far as to call him a jive clown. He is a bit naive, but I haven't seen him as the kind of comical buffoon that something like that implies.


There's a monumental difference between a strong female (e.g. Ripley in Alien & Aliens) who is either strong from the start, or naturally, believably shows fortitude after a conflict, and the rip-an-established-format-and-plot all to play into the Mary Sue agenda seen in the Star Wars sequel movies. Its an insult to all of the strong female characters who came decades before to even whisper Rey as being some sort of threat to alleged sexist belief, when its clear she is just one of many characters at the forefront of the current misandrist campaign. Only with this film series, misandry is coupled with hardline racial stereotypes.
I've never really seen Rey as a Mary Sue, for me a Mary Sue is some who is just miraculously better than everybody at everything, and I don't really think Rey was. Yes she was very capable, but that came from having to learn to live on her own, and defend herself. Pretty much everything we see her do can be tracked back to her skills she picked up on Jakku.


Funny. The stores in my region which stocked TLJ toys months before the film's release, including several Wal-Mart supercenters, Target, grocery and book stores--were filled with unsold toys. When the film was released (keep in mind that was during the hot point of the Christmas shopping season), again, I noticed figures being nothing more than peg warmers. The best-selling sequel series toys are usually the interactive BB-8, R2 and a few ship toys, but Rey, Finn and Poe figures are not hot sellers.
Well, I spend 4-6 hours, up to 5 days a week at my store, and I walk through the toys department at least 3 or 4 times every day, and I watched that Star Wars stuff disappear pretty quickly. On the first day we had a packed 4 piece display, and within a week it was almost completely empty. Every time I walked by it stuff had noticeably disappeared, which is a lot more than I can say for most of these kinds of displays, which can often sit there for days with only a handful of items disappearing from it. Yes, there is stuff still sitting on the pegs, but that's because A) they send out a ton of the stuff, and B) because everybody that wants it, rushes out and buys it that first weekend.[/QUOTE]
 
Force Friday was some time ago now...September wasn't it?

At JC Penney's there are still a lot of the larger Forces of Destiny figures on the pegs than anything to do with The Last Jedi. We had people looking for anything Porg related just before Christmas.
 
I haven't seen much noticeable movement on the Forces of Destiny stuff either, but that is a bit more of a niche thing that the Black Series figures, Funko Pop!s and Porg plushes.
 
Apparently, this was the ship which Rey saw flying away in her vision in The Force Awakens (I don't know the source; it's labelled "family ship", implying it was owned by her family, or at least supposed to be when this sketch was made): http://i.imgur.com/JP75vLr.jpg

Does not really match those junkies who died in a desert, and since they went to the trouble of designing the thing I guess there was originally more significance to it.

IIRC, the ship was designed for an unrelated deleted scene in the film (which is what "family ship" refers to). They just used it in the flashback because it was handy as a generic Star Wars ship.

The way I see it, it's entirely possible Rey's parents never got near that ship. She was pretty young in the flashback. Either they lied brazenly about why they were leaving her, or she invented her own story based on what was going on ("My parents are leaving me" + "There's a ship taking off" = "My parents are on that ship")
 
JD,

I am black. And I do agree with Trek_God_1 about the problematic portrayal of Finn. It really bothered me in TFA and took me right out of the film. (Similar to how Jar Jar Binks took me out of TPM; but at least Mace Windu was there to counter Jar Jar). Finn is not as stereotypical in TLJ as he was in TFA, but he’s still a largely superfluous character. Now, there are other black Star Wars fans who disagree with me, some strongly, and found nothing wrong with Finn in TFA. Just like there are other black fans who do agree with me, on some levels at least that Finn was a problem character and that Disney-inexplicably-drenched him in stereotypes. I would not use the phrase ‘jive clown’ to describe Finn, but 'minstrel', probably yeah.

I don’t necessarily look at it as an issue solely belonging to the left or far left though. I think there is a societal problem here, across the political spectrum which infects our entertainment when it comes to the depictions of black characters far too often. I was aware of this as a kid and I as I’ve grown up and learned more about the history of blacks and cinema and more about stereotypes I still think it’s an issue even though in some ways there is more representation than it was when I was growing up.

You Tube reviewer Grace Randolph brought up an interesting number that 9% of the audience for TLJ was black. She speculated herself that that might have been the result of Finn’s TFA depiction and I don’t disagree. I mean, if the goal here is representation and inclusion, having the prime black character (because Star Wars only provides one prime black character per saga; though there was the kooky Saw Gerrera who spent all his life fighting but just gave up when they needed him the most in Rogue One, for I don’t know, reasons?) like Finn doesn’t generate much excitement. He turned out not to be a bad ass, capable Stormtrooper, he turned out not to be a Jedi, he was comic relief, and at the end of TFA he was in a coma. How inspirational is that? What message was Disney sending here, intentional or not? That’s how I look at it. Also, there have never been any notable black female characters in any Star Wars film. You have a few prequel era Jedi who get some brief screen time, but none of them speak. There’s Senator Pamlo in Rogue One, but she was advocating surrendering if I recall correctly, and you might have a background pilot here or there in the sequel films, but nothing that really comes to mind. Leia’s aide, Korr Sella, died on Hosnian Prime, and we see her death but that’s it. The track record is scant when it comes to depicting black characters period in Star Wars over the last 40 years, and the sequels took steps backward from the Lucas films. Though both Mace and Lando deserved more screen time, they were better depicted characters than Finn.

About the toy issue, I do see some Rogue One stuff still on the shelves. And I still see a TFA Finn on the shelves. There’s TLJ stuff out there of course, and just today I saw a Rebels Leia. In my area there’s a hodgepodge of toys out there. I wouldn’t say they are selling out, but sometimes it looks like they are getting sold. I did just see a row of Force of Destiny characters, but I haven’t been paying much attention to see if those numbers are dipping at the local Walmart. Even though I had issues with TLJ, Target had a sale on Star Wars stuff about a week ago so I racked up. Even got the Imperial officer Finn, Rey, Poe, two First Order stormtroopers (all from the Black Series), and then some of the smaller action figures. I would really like to find a Snoke in the stores. I could probably get him online but I don’t want to put that much effort into it. Even though I’m not a big fan of the sequel characters the Black Series makes some really nice-looking toys, and the sequels do have pretty good production design for costumes.
 
There's two sides to every story. There are fans who continually defend Disney Star Wars, and those who attack. Its the essence of the free exchange of ideas, regardless of the outcome. Diminished returns is a gamble Disney is willing to take to milk the franchise dry like Luke with his space cow juice. So I agree with you there. But this is a fandom discussion about Disney Star Wars. Whether we like it or not, it's important to discuss the failings and triumphs in the hopes that maybe they'll get it right. I still say Disney is treating Star Wars like Marvel Legacy..which bombed..to do it with all the legacy characters, killing them off and replacing them with new versions, is very Hollywood, and very calous and cruel to the traditional fans. Which almost feels like Disney thinks the original fans don't matter..their money does, and maybe they think just because they put "Star Wars" on a movie, those dissed fans will still buy..to a certain extent their right..sadly..
Can I ask a genuine question-what would you have them do? Seriously. Everyone acts like Star Wars was this sacred thing, unsullied by merchandising or profits, before the evil Disney came along. But, what do you think would have happened?

Because, I'm going to be honest-Star Wars lost me at Yuzong Vong and Cade Skywalker, that Legacy series. Was that cruel to "traditional fans" (whomever they may be?)? Because that series certainly felt very much a betrayal of the SW ethos.

tl: dr Apparently, I was "woke" before Disney...:shrug:
Just beause franchise owners say "here are your new heroes" doesn't mean the public will embrace them with open arms. This has to do with the question of what makes a franchise successful in the first place.
Seeing as how "the public" has a diverse opinions, how should we measure this "embracing?"
You've seen the Star Wars audition videos, right? Would we be having this discussion if William Katt or any of the others had been cast? I'd say no. Introducing characters to the audience is sort of like a blind date. Either the chemistry pops or it doesn't. Lightning doesn't strike twice.
And will vary from person to person.
 
.
I'm asking this purely out of curiosity, but are you black? Or if not have you heard from black fans what they think of Finn?

I have heard from a large number of black and white fans (in person and social media) about the deliberate racial mishandling of Finn. Some have referred to Finn in ways I will not repeat here, but essentially, they believe he's not only what Liberal Hollywood wants to see in a black male (more often than not), but his minstrel behavior makes him a throwback to film actors such as Lincoln Theodore Monroe Andrew Perry, known to the world as Stepin Fetchit.

I'll admit, the whole thing with him being a janitor might not have been the best idea in the world, but I would definitely not go so far as to call him a jive clown. He is a bit naive, but I haven't seen him as the kind of comical buffoon that something like that implies.

I touched on this the other day: of all occupations the producers/writers of TFA could have given Finn, they purposely make him a janitor, instead of someone with a skill closely tied to being a stormtrooper. In fact, the specific function of being a trooper has no connection to sanitation, anymore than one would not expect to see a police officer in charge of or working sanitation in the precinct. There's no excuse, other than to do what Hollywood has for generations: reduce the black male to so-called "low", unskilled labor that removes any notion of higher thought function and interest. That's another way of making sure he--in the eyes of those disgusted by black male/white female relations--will seem unsuitable for Rey (despite her being the equivalent of a peasant girl). because the lens of racism has always views such occupations as being best suited for black people.


I've never really seen Rey as a Mary Sue, for me a Mary Sue is some who is just miraculously better than everybody at everything, and I don't really think Rey was. Yes she was very capable, but that came from having to learn to live on her own, and defend herself. Pretty much everything we see her do can be tracked back to her skills she picked up on Jakku.

She's a Mary Sue because she comes from nowhere with zero training and defeats someone who is on par with (if not surpasses) the Force power/skill possessed by Anakin in Attack of the Clones. There's not even a suggestion that she has much to learn, while this fact is contrasted with Force-using males like the powerful Luke and Anakin, who needed training to even begin to successfully manipulate the Force. In other words, she's a female superior to any male and needs no logical or accountable experience to justify her position--like any other character. That is the work of misandrist propaganda, not a desire for equality.

Well, I spend 4-6 hours, up to 5 days a week at my store, and I walk through the toys department at least 3 or 4 times every day, and I watched that Star Wars stuff disappear pretty quickly. On the first day we had a packed 4 piece display, and within a week it was almost completely empty. Every time I walked by it stuff had noticeably disappeared, which is a lot more than I can say for most of these kinds of displays, which can often sit there for days with only a handful of items disappearing from it. Yes, there is stuff still sitting on the pegs, but that's because A) they send out a ton of the stuff, and B) because everybody that wants it, rushes out and buys it that first weekend.

I still see TLJ figures on pegs in my region, and it appears there's as little interest in these characters as in TFA's case. On that point, TFA's figures have been collecting dust on red-tagged or discounted sections.

JD,
I am black. And I do agree with Trek_God_1 about the problematic portrayal of Finn. It really bothered me in TFA and took me right out of the film. (Similar to how Jar Jar Binks took me out of TPM; but at least Mace Windu was there to counter Jar Jar).

Mace was okay, but the implications of Jar Jar (being a sort of Jamaican clown stereotype) tripped up any step forward Mace may have represented.

Just like there are other black fans who do agree with me, on some levels at least that Finn was a problem character and that Disney-inexplicably-drenched him in stereotypes. I would not use the phrase ‘jive clown’ to describe Finn, but 'minstrel', probably yeah.

...and again, this is happening during the (allegedly) most liberal, open-minded period in history...except where the depiction of one group of people is concerned. Incredibly glaring in the biggest entertainment franchise the world has ever known.

I don’t necessarily look at it as an issue solely belonging to the left or far left though. I think there is a societal problem here, across the political spectrum which infects our entertainment when it comes to the depictions of black characters far too often. I was aware of this as a kid and I as I’ve grown up and learned more about the history of blacks and cinema and more about stereotypes I still think it’s an issue even though in some ways there is more representation than it was when I was growing up.

Racism is a societal problem, but the treatment which controls the message and informs perception comes from the all-powerful entertainment media, which is relentless in shaping, turning inside-out and projecting their own, often warped sociopolitical views. This is the same entertainment industry that screams about Girl Power, but has no issue with making male characters fools in an effort to make female characters appear stronger/smarter, etc. and ignoring the hypocrisy of that. More to the point, they are the same industry that attacks the Right (particularly politicians) about issues of diversity, yet they--as the maker of unavoidable images saturating every corner of public and private life--sell the worst impressions of black people, males more than female.

You Tube reviewer Grace Randolph brought up an interesting number that 9% of the audience for TLJ was black. She speculated herself that that might have been the result of Finn’s TFA depiction and I don’t disagree.

That's a good point reflected in the statements I've heard.

I mean, if the goal here is representation and inclusion, having the prime black character (because Star Wars only provides one prime black character per saga; though there was the kooky Saw Gerrera who spent all his life fighting but just gave up when they needed him the most in Rogue One, for I don’t know, reasons?)

Reasons like this so-called important character had to die, so he would not present a strong black male image in a film designed to be all about Jyn Erso and no one else.

Finn doesn’t generate much excitement. He turned out not to be a bad ass, capable Stormtrooper, he turned out not to be a Jedi, he was comic relief, and at the end of TFA he was in a coma. How inspirational is that? What message was Disney sending here, intentional or not? That’s how I look at it.

Their message was that in the zenith of Hollywood as a liberal image shaping machine, a black male character--in the biggest film franchise / most visible film of the year--is not going to be some dashing hero, or even a growing one with heroic potential. He's going to bug his eyes, scream, stretch his mouth, trip, stumble and let everyone know that he was unskilled labor as a janitor. That's supposed to stand alongside the ultimate, untouchable (by black Finn) Super Mary-Sue.
 
Force Friday was some time ago now...September wasn't it?

At JC Penney's there are still a lot of the larger Forces of Destiny figures on the pegs than anything to do with The Last Jedi. We had people looking for anything Porg related just before Christmas.

And let’s not forget the fact that online retailers are outselling brick and mortar... when the Prequels came out, certain figures flew off the shelves and a lot just hung there. This is a different time. I’d like to see Amazon’s and Think Geek’s Star Wars related holiday figures before I pass judgement.
 
Can I ask a genuine question-what would you have them do? Seriously. Everyone acts like Star Wars was this sacred thing, unsullied by merchandising or profits, before the evil Disney came along. But, what do you think would have happened?

Because, I'm going to be honest-Star Wars lost me at Yuzong Vong and Cade Skywalker, that Legacy series. Was that cruel to "traditional fans" (whomever they may be?)? Because that series certainly felt very much a betrayal of the SW ethos.

tl: dr Apparently, I was "woke" before Disney...:shrug:

Seeing as how "the public" has a diverse opinions, how should we measure this "embracing?"

And will vary from person to person.
How about start at the beginning. The first jedi to emerge.the first Sith. Or how about they didn't touch any of episodes 1-6, go out further. Like 2,000 years after Luke. Would have been cool to see. Or how about knights of the old republic. Or if they had to go legacy, try Luke and the fledgling republic VS the Mandalorians..that would have been cool. Or a galactic civil war between the republic..better then whitey Nazis versus virtuous minorities led by brave white women..just a few examples off the top of my head.
 
How about start at the beginning. The first jedi to emerge.the first Sith. Or how about they didn't touch any of episodes 1-6, go out further. Like 2,000 years after Luke. Would have been cool to see. Or how about knights of the old republic. Or if they had to go legacy, try Luke and the fledgling republic VS the Mandalorians..that would have been cool. Or a galactic civil war between the republic..better then whitey Nazis versus virtuous minorities led by brave white women..just a few examples off the top of my head.
None of which would be as you visualize them. Lucas had already put it out there that the films were the Skywalker family saga, so, the sequel trilogy was inevitable.

Also, as I said, every time the books did something "different" it pushed me away. So, I don't see any of those ideas going better than what happened in the books.

Also, "White Nazis?" You do realize that the Galactic Empire was heavily influenced by Nazis, and the idea of the Rebels came from the Viet Cong fighting against Americans forces?
 
JD,

I am black. And I do agree with Trek_God_1 about the problematic portrayal of Finn. It really bothered me in TFA and took me right out of the film. (Similar to how Jar Jar Binks took me out of TPM; but at least Mace Windu was there to counter Jar Jar). Finn is not as stereotypical in TLJ as he was in TFA, but he’s still a largely superfluous character. Now, there are other black Star Wars fans who disagree with me, some strongly, and found nothing wrong with Finn in TFA. Just like there are other black fans who do agree with me, on some levels at least that Finn was a problem character and that Disney-inexplicably-drenched him in stereotypes. I would not use the phrase ‘jive clown’ to describe Finn, but 'minstrel', probably yeah.

I don’t necessarily look at it as an issue solely belonging to the left or far left though. I think there is a societal problem here, across the political spectrum which infects our entertainment when it comes to the depictions of black characters far too often. I was aware of this as a kid and I as I’ve grown up and learned more about the history of blacks and cinema and more about stereotypes I still think it’s an issue even though in some ways there is more representation than it was when I was growing up.

You Tube reviewer Grace Randolph brought up an interesting number that 9% of the audience for TLJ was black. She speculated herself that that might have been the result of Finn’s TFA depiction and I don’t disagree. I mean, if the goal here is representation and inclusion, having the prime black character (because Star Wars only provides one prime black character per saga; though there was the kooky Saw Gerrera who spent all his life fighting but just gave up when they needed him the most in Rogue One, for I don’t know, reasons?) like Finn doesn’t generate much excitement. He turned out not to be a bad ass, capable Stormtrooper, he turned out not to be a Jedi, he was comic relief, and at the end of TFA he was in a coma. How inspirational is that? What message was Disney sending here, intentional or not? That’s how I look at it. Also, there have never been any notable black female characters in any Star Wars film. You have a few prequel era Jedi who get some brief screen time, but none of them speak. There’s Senator Pamlo in Rogue One, but she was advocating surrendering if I recall correctly, and you might have a background pilot here or there in the sequel films, but nothing that really comes to mind. Leia’s aide, Korr Sella, died on Hosnian Prime, and we see her death but that’s it. The track record is scant when it comes to depicting black characters period in Star Wars over the last 40 years, and the sequels took steps backward from the Lucas films. Though both Mace and Lando deserved more screen time, they were better depicted characters than Finn.

About the toy issue, I do see some Rogue One stuff still on the shelves.

Thank you for posting, this is the first I've actually heard a black person's perspective on Finn. I admit, as a white person, I'm not always great at picking out racism unless it's really, really blantant, and it honestly hadn't occurred to me people might have problems with Finn.
I have heard from a large number of black and white fans (in person and social media) about the deliberate racial mishandling of Finn. Some have referred to Finn in ways I will not repeat here, but essentially, they believe he's not only what Liberal Hollywood wants to see in a black male (more often than not), but his minstrel behavior makes him a throwback to film actors such as Lincoln Theodore Monroe Andrew Perry, known to the world as Stepin Fetchit.
The moment people start using dumbass, bullshit phrases like SJW or "liberal Hollywood" I instantly lose all respect for their arguments.

At this point I regret responding to you in the first place, although it did at least inspire Darkush's post, which I did find interesting.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top