I mean...something has to be the worst thing ever associated with the Star Trek brand.
Why not choose them?![]()
Was the Section 31 movie not already taken?

I mean...something has to be the worst thing ever associated with the Star Trek brand.
Why not choose them?![]()
Things are either best ever or worst ever.Wow, really? They were just harmless fun. If you didn't like them fine, but to call them "the worst thing ever associated with the Star Trek Brand" is really over the top hyperbole of the highest order.
Were people entertained?How many times have they now tried to aim their stuff towards younger audiences? I mean... did that ever work?
The snot one wad really bad, but it did make a valid point about cultural norms and the difficulties in overcoming cultural differences.Wow, really? They were just harmless fun. If you didn't like them fine, but to call them "the worst thing ever associated with the Star Trek Brand" is really over the top hyperbole of the highest order.
Wow, really? They were just harmless fun. If you didn't like them fine, but to call them "the worst thing ever associated with the Star Trek Brand" is really over the top hyperbole of the highest order.
Were people entertained?
Prodigy was regarded well
People think Star Trek is cool?That's not what I was wondering tho. Of course people were entertained. But did Paramount's attempts at drawing kids and teens to the Trek franchise with "targeted at a younger audience" work? From what I know about Trek, it's mostly Trekkie parents who make their kids watch Trek and introduce them to the franchise that way, not kids watching shows like Prodigy on their own accord and thinking "oh Star Trek is so cool".
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.